Effects Of High Voltage Pulsed Current On Post-Traumatic Injuries

August 6, 2008 updated by: Universidad Industrial de Santander

Effects Of High Voltage Pulsed Current On Ankle Post-Traumatic Injuries

The investigators hypothesis is that HVPC with negative polarity diminishes local post-traumatic edema in ankle sprains. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the effect of HVPC on edema secondary to ankle sprains in humans.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Most studies have investigated the effects of HVPC on edema in animals and only one in humans was identified. The studies had showed that HVPC had some advantages for controlling edema in animals but there are not yet conclusive results on the effect of this intervention in humans.For this reason, we proposed a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial with three groups of intervention. In our study compared the effects of standard physical therapy treatment with the HVPC with negative and positive polarity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Colombia
    • Santander
      • Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
        • Industrial University of Santander UIS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 26 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ankle post traumatic edema secondary to a sprain
  • Sprain with evolution between 2 and 96 hours
  • Sprain positive to anterior drawer test or lateral inclination mobilizations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with grade III sprains that required surgical management
  • Edema secondary to systemic illness
  • Muscular dystrophy or atrophy
  • Injuries, open or infected zones
  • People taking anti-inflammatory medication or using empirical treatment as tractions, strong massages or manual.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HVPC-
This group received standard physical therapy treatment and HVPC with negative polarity.
Device: high voltage pulse stimulation with negative polarity
A high voltage stimulator with negative polarity was used with a direct pulsed monophasic current, double peak, 5 and 8micros duration and separated by a pulsate interval of 75micros and monopolar application with a dispersive electrode in the lumbar region and two transarticular active electrodes. The intensity of the current was under motor level, that is, just before a visible motor response could be observed. The frequency used was 120pps, in a continuous mode and was applied once a day with thirty-minute duration.
Other Names:
  • electrical stimulation
  • electrical current
Active Comparator: CG
The control group received only standard physical therapy treatment.
Other: standard physical therapy treatment
  • Initial phase: Application of crushed ice on the ankle for 20 minutes. The subject performed isometric and active exercises of the ankle in all freedom degrees, with no weight bearing.
  • Intermediate phase: Application of cryotherapy continued and once mobility was completed and painless, progressive use of weight and reeducation of the walking pattern were initiated. Then, exercises with manual resistance of muscles of ankle and balance in stable surfaces were done.
  • Advanced phase: Balance exercises on unstable surfaces as well as strengthening ankle muscles with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and elastic band were performed. At the end, the patient did activities like trotting in S or Z and jumping in all directions.
Other Names:
  • standard care
Experimental: HVPC+
This group received standard physical therapy treatment and HVPC using active electrodes with positive polarity.
Device: Standard physical therapy and HVPC with positive polarity
A high voltage stimulator with positive polarity was used with a direct pulsed monophasic current, double peak, 5 and 8micros duration and separated by a pulsate interval of 75micros and monopolar application with a dispersive electrode in the lumbar region and two transarticular active electrodes. The intensity of the current was under motor level, that is, just before a visible motor response could be observed. The frequency used was 120pps, in a continuous mode and was applied once a day with thirty-minute duration.
Other Names:
  • electrical stimulation
  • electrical current

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain with the visual analogue scale.
Time Frame: The pain was measured before and at the end of the treatment.
The pain was measured before and at the end of the treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Range of movement (ROM) of plantar and dorsal flexion, inversion and eversion were measured with a goniometer.
Time Frame: The ROM was measured before and at the end of the treatment.
The ROM was measured before and at the end of the treatment.
Edema was assessed with measures of ankle girth and volume.
Time Frame: The edema was measured before and at the end of the treatment.
The edema was measured before and at the end of the treatment.
Some descriptive variables of gait such as step and stride length, and the gait speed.
Time Frame: The variables of gait were measured before and at the end of the treatment
The variables of gait were measured before and at the end of the treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Industrial de Santander

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Maria Cristina Sandoval Ortiz, M.Sc in P.T., Industrial University of Santander
  • Principal Investigator: Liliana Carolina Ramirez Ramirez, P.T., Industrial University of Santander
  • Study Chair: Diana Marina Camargo Lemos, M.Sc. Epid., Industrial University of Santander
  • Study Chair: Tania De Fatima Salvini, Ph.D, Universidade Federal de São Carlos

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 6, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 11, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2008

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5612

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings