Safety And Efficacy Of Maraviroc In Patients For HIV Patients (Regulatory Post Marketing Commitment Plan)

December 6, 2019 updated by: ViiV Healthcare

DRUG USE INVESTIGATION FOR HIV INFECTION PATIENTS OF MARAVIROC (REGULATORY POST MARKETING COMMITMENT PLAN).

The objective of this surveillance is to collect information about 1) adverse drug reaction not expected from the LPD (unknown adverse drug reaction), 2) the incidence of adverse drug reactions in this surveillance, and 3)factors considered to affect the safety and/or efficacy of this drug.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All the patients whom an investigator prescribes the first CELSENTRI® Tablets should be registered consecutively until the number of subjects reaches target number in order to extract patients enrolled into the investigation at random.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients whom an investigator involving A4001093 prescribes the Maraviroc Tablets (CELSENTRI® Tablets).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients need to be administered CELSENTRI® Tablets in order to be enrolled in the surveillance.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients not administered CELSENTRI® Tablets.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Maraviroc Tablets
Patients administered.
Drug: CELSENTRI® Tablets
CELSENTRI ® Tablets 150mg, depending on the Investigator prescription. Frequency and duration are according to Package Insert as follows. "The usual adult dosage is 300 mg twice daily. Maraviroc must be used in combination with other anti-HIV drugs. The dosage may be adjusted according to co-administered medical products. Maraviroc can be taken with or without food".
Other Names:
  • CELSENTRI® Tablets, maraviroc, Selzentry

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Number of Participants With Unknown Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. Unknown ADRs were the ADRs those were not listed on the package insert.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Gender
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by gender are reported to assess gender as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Age
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by age are reported to assess age as a risk factor for ADR. ">=" refers to greater than or equal to.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Inpatient or Outpatient Status
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by inpatient or outpatient status are reported to assess inpatient or outpatient status as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Ethnicity
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by ethnicity are reported to assess ethnicity as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of History of Therapies for Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus (HIV) Infection
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of history of therapies for HIV Infection are reported to assess presence or absence of history of therapies for HIV Infection as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor HIV Infection Duration
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by HIV infection duration are reported to assess HIV infection duration as a risk factor for ADR. Unknown: participants for which the duration of HIV infection was not known.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of Allergies
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of allergies are reported to assess presence or absence of allergies as a risk factor for ADR. Unknown: participants for which the presence or absence of allergies was not known.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of Comorbidities
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of comorbidities are reported to assess presence or absence of comorbidities as a risk factor for ADR. Comorbidity referred to the presence of co-existing or additional diseases along with HIV infection.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of Renal Impairment
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of renal impairment are reported to assess presence or absence of renal impairment as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of Hepatic Impairment
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of hepatic impairment are reported to assess presence or absence of hepatic impairment as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of Hemophilia
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of hemophilia are reported to assess presence or absence of hemophilia as a risk factor for ADR. Hemophilia is a bleeding disorder that slows the blood clotting process. Participants with this condition experience prolonged bleeding or oozing following an injury, surgery, or having a tooth pulled.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Mean Daily Dose of Celsentri
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by mean daily dose of Celsentri are reported to assess mean daily dose of Celsentri as a risk factor for ADR. One tablet of Celsentri had a dose of 150 mg.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Number of Concomitant Anti-HIV Drugs Use
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by number of concomitant anti-HIV treatment are reported to assess number of concomitant anti-HIV treatment as a risk factor for ADR. Concomitant drugs refers to the drugs other than Celsentri.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Classification
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR:any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by physician.Participants are divided into 3 categories as per CDC classification based on level of HIV infection: Category A= asymptomatic HIV-1 infection, persistent generalized lymphadenopathy and acute(primary)HIV-1 infection with accompanying illness or history of acute HIV-1 infection in adult or adolescent aged>=13 years, Category B: conditions attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or the conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection in an HIV-infected adolescent or adult; and Category C: clinical conditions listed in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) diagnostic criteria, corresponding to conventional AIDS. Unknown: Participants for which CDC classification was not described.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor as Per Presence or Absence of Concomitant Therapies
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of concomitant therapies are reported to assess presence or absence of concomitant therapies as a risk factor for ADR. Concomitant therapies were the treatments taken by participants to treat comorbid conditions.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Presence or Absence of Use of Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) Enzyme Inducer Taken Along With Celsentri
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by presence or absence of concomitant CYP3A4 enzyme inducer use are reported to assess presence or absence of concomitant CYP3A enzyme inducer use as a risk factor for ADR. CYP3A4 is an important enzyme in the body, mainly found in the liver and in the intestine. This enzyme is responsible for metabolism of majority of drugs. Many of the food substances and commonly used drugs act as inducer for enzyme CYP3A4.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Total Number of Days of Administration of Celsentri
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by total number of days of administration of Celsentri are reported to assess total number of days of administration of Celsentri as a risk factor for ADR.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Factor Mean Total Dose of Celsentri
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with ADRs categorized by mean total dose of Celsentri are reported to assess mean total dose of Celsentri as a risk factor for ADR. One tablet of Celsentri had a dose of 150 mg.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Number of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Considered to Have Occurred Due to Effect of Celsentri on Immune Function
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Number of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Considered to Have Occurred Due to Effect of Celsentri on Hepatic Function
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Number of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) Considered to Have Occurred Due to Effect of Celsentri on Cardiovascular Effects
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to Celsentri tablets in a participant who received Celsentri tablets. Relatedness to Celsentri tablets was assessed by the physician.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Number of Plasma Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus-Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) Copies: Factor Gender
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
HIV-RNA copy numbers were measured employing the TaqMan assay with the lower limit of detection of 40 copies per milliliter (copies/mL). The reported data for plasma HIV-RNA copies was calculated after logarithmic conversion.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of Cluster of Differentiation of More Than 4 (CD4+) Lymphocyte Count: Factor Gender
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
CD4+ Lymphocyte were counted by CD4 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3). CD4 cells are the white blood cells and act as laboratory marker providing an indication of immune functioning. A higher number is associated with better immune functioning.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of Plasma Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus-Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) Copies: Factor The Presence or Absence of Comorbidities
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
HIV-RNA copy numbers were measured employing the TaqMan assay with the lower limit of detection of 40 copies/mL. The reported data for plasma HIV-RNA copies was calculated after logarithmic conversion.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of CD4+ Lymphocyte Counts: Fcator The Presence or Absence of Comorbidities
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
CD4 cells are the white blood cells and act as laboratory marker providing an indication of immune functioning. A higher number is associated with better immune functioning.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of Plasma HIV-RNA Copies: Factor The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Classification
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Participants are divided into 3 categories as per CDC classification based on the level of HIV infection as follows: Category A= asymptomatic HIV-1 infection, persistent generalized lymphadenopathy and acute (primary) HIV-1 infection with accompanying illness or history of acute HIV-1 infection in an adult or adolescent aged >=13 years, Category B: conditions attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or the conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection in an HIV-infected adolescent or adult; and Category C: clinical conditions listed in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) diagnostic criteria, corresponding to conventional AIDS. Once criteria C has occurred, the person will remain in Category C even if symptoms are alleviated.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of CD4+ Lymphocyte Counts: Factor The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Classification
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
CD4 cells are the white blood cells and act as a laboratory marker providing an indication of immune functioning. A higher number is associated with better immune functioning. Participants are divided into 3 categories as per CDC classification based on the level of HIV infection as: Category A= asymptomatic HIV-1 infection, persistent generalized lymphadenopathy and acute(primary)HIV-1 infection with accompanying illness or history of acute HIV-1 infection in an adult or adolescent aged>=13 years, Category B: conditions attributed to HIV infection or are indicative of a defect in cell-mediated immunity; or the conditions are considered by physicians to have a clinical course or to require management that is complicated by HIV infection in an HIV-infected adolescent or adult; and Category C: clinical conditions listed in the AIDS diagnostic criteria, corresponding to conventional AIDS. Once criteria C has occurred, the person will remain in Category C even if symptoms are alleviated.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of Plasma HIV-RNA Copies: Factor The Presence or Absence of History of Therapies for HIV Infection
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
HIV-RNA copy numbers were measured employing the TaqMan assay with the lower limit of detection of 40 copies/mL. The reported data for plasma HIV-RNA copies was calculated after logarithmic conversion.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of CD4+ Lymphocyte Counts: Factor Presence or Absence of History of Therapies for HIV Infection
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
CD4 cells are the white blood cells and act as a laboratory marker providing an indication of immune functioning. A higher number is associated with better immune functioning.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of Plasma HIV-RNA Copies: Factor The Presence or Absence of Use of Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) Enzyme Inducer Taken Along With Celsentri
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
HIV-RNA copy numbers were measured employing the TaqMan assay with the lower limit of detection of 40 copies/mL. CYP3A4 is an important enzyme in the body, mainly found in the liver and in the intestine. This enzyme is responsible for metabolism of majority of drugs. Many of the food substances and commonly used drugs act as inducers of enzyme CYP3A4. The reported data for plasma HIV-RNA copies was calculated after logarithmic conversion.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Mean Number of CD4+ Lymphocyte: Factor The Presence or Absence of Use of Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) Enzyme Inducer Taken Along With Celsentri
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
CD4 cells are the white blood cells and act as laboratory marker providing an indication of immune functioning. A higher number is associated with better immune functioning. CYP3A4 is an important enzyme in the body, mainly found in the liver and in the intestine. This enzyme is responsible for metabolism of many of drugs. Many of the food substances and commonly used drugs act as inducers of enzyme CYP3A4.
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Number of Participants With Tropism Switch From CCR5- to CXCR4-Tropic Variants
Time Frame: From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
CCR5= C-C chemokine receptor type 5 and CXCR4= C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4. Tropism switch is the mutation of CCR5-tropic HIV-1 to a CXCR4-using virus.
From April 2009 to December 2018 (up to approximately 8 years 8 months)
Mean Number of Plasma HIV-RNA Copies for Participants Who Took Concomitant Therapies Along With Celsentri
Time Frame: Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84
Month 0 (Baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69, 72, 75, 78, 81 and 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ViiV Healthcare

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 31, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 24, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 17, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A4001093

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Infection

Clinical Trials on CELSENTRI® Tablets

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings