Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Angular Stable Locking System (ASLS) in Patients With Distal Tibial Fractures

January 22, 2013 updated by: AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Angular Stable Locking System (ASLS) in Patients With Distal Tibial Fractures Treated With Expert Tibial Nails (ETN)

In many cases, the existing locking bolts and screws in intramedullary nails do not provide sufficient stability. The play between screw and nail can result in loss of reduction and the instability due to the interfragmentary movement can result in malunions or nonunions. Therefore, an Angular Stable Locking System for Intramedullary Nails (ASLS) was developed to enhance axial and angular fracture stability. ASLS provides angular-stable fixation between nails and screws with resorbable sleeves used as dowels in the nail locking holes. Preliminary results of a pre-study show a trend towards reduced time to pain-free full weight bearing in patients being treated with ASLS. This hypothesis will be tested in the present randomized controlled study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Angular Stable Locking System (ASLS) in patients with distal tibial fractures treated with Expert Tibial Nails (ETN). In many cases, the existing locking bolts and screws in intramedullary nails do not provide sufficient stability. The play between screw and nail can result in loss of reduction and the instability due to the interfragmentary movement can result in malunions or nonunions. Therefore, an Angular Stable Locking System for Intramedullary Nails (ASLS) was developed to enhance axial and angular fracture stability. ASLS provides angular-stable fixation between nails and screws with resorbable sleeves used as dowels in the nail locking holes. Preliminary results of a pre-study show a trend towards reduced time to pain-free full weight bearing in patients being treated with ASLS. This hypothesis will be tested in the present randomized controlled study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
141

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Medizinische Universität
  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Charité
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule
      • Homburg/Saar, Germany, 66421
        • Universität des Saarlandes
      • Jena, Germany, 07740
        • Friedrich-Schiller-Universität
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitätsmedizin Mainz
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • BG Unfallklinik
  • Norway
      • Tonsberg, Norway, 3103
        • Sykehuset i Vestfold HF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is ≥ 18 years old
  • The patient suffers from an acute distal third tibial fracture classified as:

AO 42 A1-A3, AO 42 B1-B3, AO 42 C1-C3, AO 43 A1-A3

  • The fracture is fixed with an Expert Tibia Nail (ETN)
  • The patient was able to walk without walking aid prior to the accident
  • The patient is able to understand and read local language at elementary level
  • The patient is willing and able to give written informed consent to participate in the study according to the CIP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is legally incompetent
  • Preexistent malunion or nonunion of the fracture under investigation
  • Osteotomies
  • The patient suffers from additional fractures of the lower extremities (Exception: ipsilateral fibular fracture)
  • The patient suffers from a pathologic fracture
  • The patient suffers from active malignancy
  • The patient is pregnant, breast feeding or planning to get pregnant during the study period
  • The patient suffers from a life-threatening condition
  • The patient is affected by drug or alcohol abuse
  • The patient has participated in any device related clinical trial affecting the lower extremities within the previous month
  • The patient has participated in any drug related clinical trial affecting bone healing within the previous month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: ETN with ASLS
Angle stable locking of the Expert Tibial Nail using ASLS
Device: ETN with ASLS
Angle stable locking of ETN using ASLS
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ETN with conventional locking
Conventional locking of the Expert Tibial Nail using conventional locking bolts
Device: ETN locked with conventional locking bolts
Conventional surgical procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to pain free full weight bearing
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Amount of partial weight bearing
Time Frame: Up to achievement of primary outcome
Up to achievement of primary outcome

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Synthes Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dankward Hoentzsch, MD, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ASLS RCT 09

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tibial Fractures

Clinical Trials on ETN with ASLS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings