Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Active RA Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan (JESMR)

September 1, 2015 updated by: Hideto Kameda, Japan Biological Agent Study Integrated Consortium

Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan

Multi-center, parallel-group, randomized, open control study. All patients will be selected to two treatment groups.

  1. Etanercept alone treatment group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)
  2. Etanercept combined with MTX group (25mg, twice/week, s.c.+MTX 6-8mg/week)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

151

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan, 160-8582
        • Keio University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients had to be at least 18 years of age
  • fulfilled the 1987 revised classification criteria for RA by in American College of Rheumatology (ACR)
  • met the guidelines for the proper use of ETN in Japan (having at least 6 tender joints and 6 swollen joints
  • either serum C-reactive protein more than 2 mg/dl or ESR no less than 28 mm at 1 hour, with adequate safety profiles)
  • be ACR functional class I-III
  • have been receiving MTX 6 mg/week for a minimum of 3 months at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks at the time of study enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who required concurrent use of prednisone (PSL) >10 mg/day, or its equivalent, were excluded from study entry
  • the start of dose increment of PSL equivalents within 3 months of the study enrollment
  • experience of antirheumatic therapy except for MTX and PSL equivalents
  • previous treatment with ETN or any other biological treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ETN Alone
etanercept (25mg, twice/week, s.c.)
etanercept (25 mg, twice/week, s.c.)
Other Names:
  • etanercept
Active Comparator: ETN+MTX
etanercept (25mg, twice/week, s.c.) combined with methotrexate (6-8mg/week)
etanercept (25 mg, twice/week, s.c.) combined with methotrexate (6-8 mg/week)
Other Names:
  • etanercept and methotrexate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EULAR Good Response
Time Frame: at 24 weeks
EULAR good response was defined as reaching, at least, low decease activity by the disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) and its improvement by > 1.2. DAS28 is a quantitative composite measure of disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis, and DAS28 < 3.2 is regarded as low disease activity.
at 24 weeks
ACR50 Response Rate
Time Frame: at 24 weeks
ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 response is defined by the following definition of improvement: at least 50% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and at least 50% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR-core set measures; patient and physician global assessments, pain, disability, and an acute phase reactant (erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein).
at 24 weeks
Radiographic Progression Defined by Change in Van Der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score
Time Frame: at 52 weeks

The van der Heijde-modifiedtotal Sharp score is the sum of scores for erosions and joint space narrowing. The minimum and maximum total scores are 0 and 448, respectively. The maximum number of erosions is 160 in the hands and 120 in the feet; and the maximum scores for joint space narrowing are 120 and 48, respectively.

Erosions are scored 1 for a discrete interruption of the cortical surface, and scored 2-5 for a larger defect according to the surface area of the joint involved. Notably, the maximum erosion score in each joint in hands is 5, while it is 10 in the feet.

For joint space narrowing, 0=normal; 1=focal or doubtful; 2=general, <50% of the original joint space; 3=general, >50% of the original joint space or subluxation; 4=ankylosis.

at 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tsutomu Takeuchi, MD, PhD, JBASIC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on ETN Alone

3
Subscribe