The SMARTEX Heart Failure Study (SMARTEX)

November 12, 2019 updated by: Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Study of Myocardial Recovery After Exercise Training in Heart Failure

This protocol describes a randomized multicenter clinical trial designed to test the hypothesis that a 12-week program of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) yields larger beneficial effects in stable heart failure patients than current practice, defined as either a similar training program with the same volume of moderate continuous training (MCT) or a recommendation of regular exercise at moderate intensity at individual choice (RRE).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Evaluation criteria are left ventricular dimensions and function measured by echocardiography, aerobic capacity measured as peak oxygen uptake, quality of life, and the level of physical activity by questionnaires. Assessments will be made before and after the training program and at one year follow-up. Safety of HIIT will be assessed as incidence of adverse effects during the training program. Clinical events will be recorded as worsening of heart failure requiring intensified drug therapy (diuretics), ventricular arrhythmia, hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality at one year follow-up. The core study has been initiated and endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Section for Basic and Translational Research, under the European Society of Cardiology, and allows for sub-studies involving one or more of the participating centers. Preliminary calculations suggest that a total number of 200 patients randomized 1:1:1 to the three intervention groups is needed to detect larger beneficial effects with HIIT with a p-value of 0.05 and statistical power of 0.90 (primary endpoint is reverse remodeling, assessed by comparison between groups of change in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension from baseline to 12 weeks).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
261

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Antwerp, Belgium
        • University Hospital Antwerp
  • Denmark
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Bispebjerg University Hospital
  • Germany
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • Universitaet Leipzig, Herzzentrum GmbH
      • Munich, Germany
        • Technische Universitaet Munich
  • Italy
      • Veruno, Italy
        • Scientific Institute of Veruno
  • Luxembourg
      • Luxembourg, Luxembourg
        • Centre Hospitaliers de Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Norway
      • Alesund, Norway
        • Ålesund Hospital
      • Levanger, Norway
        • Levanger hospital
      • Stavanger, Norway
        • Stavanger University Hospital
      • Trondheim, Norway
        • St. Olavs University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction or dilated cardiomyopathy with:

    • LVEF < 0.35,
    • NYHA class II - III,
    • Stable without any signs of worsening for at least 6 weeks,
    • Minimum 3 months of optimal medical treatment,
    • Previous revascularisation or CRT should be more than 6 months before inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant intercurrent illness last 6 weeks,
  • Known severe ventricular arrhythmia with functional or prognostic significance unless protected with ICD,
  • Significant ischemia,
  • Hemodynamic deterioration or exercise-induced arrhythmia at baseline testing,
  • Other heart disease that limits exercise tolerance (valve disease with significant hemodynamic consequences, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy etc.,
  • Co-morbidity that may significantly influence one-year prognosis,
  • Functional or mental disability that may limit exercise,
  • Patients scheduled for heart transplant at time of inclusion,
  • A habit of regular vigorous exercise or participation in a program of exercise training less than 6 months before inclusion, or participation in another clinical trial,
  • Patients with COPD with FEV1 below 50% of expected values are excluded,
  • Patients taking oral corticosteroids are excluded in all cases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1 Interval training
high-intensity Interval Training
Behavioral: high-intensity interval training
3 weekly sessions of high-intensity interval training in 12 weeks
Experimental: 2 Moderate Training
Moderate continuous training
Behavioral: Moderate continuous training
3 weekly sessions of moderate continuous training for 12 weeks
Active Comparator: 3 Recommendation of exercise
Recommendation of regular exercise at moderate intensity at individual choice
Behavioral: Recommendation of regular moderate exercise
Recommendation of regular exercise at moderate intensity at individual choice. In addition patients will meet for treadmill walking in order to motivate for post intervention testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
comparison between groups in change of left ventricular end diastolic diameter from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline-12 weeks
Baseline-12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: baseline-12 weeks- 1year
baseline-12 weeks- 1year
quality of life
Time Frame: baseline - 12 weeks - 1 year
baseline - 12 weeks - 1 year
level of physical activity
Time Frame: baseline-12 weeks- 1 year
baseline-12 weeks- 1 year
safety and adverse events
Time Frame: baseline-12 weeks - 1 year
baseline-12 weeks - 1 year
Change in Ejection fraction
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
UMC Utrecht
Bispebjerg Hospital
Helse Stavanger HF
St. Olavs Hospital
University Hospital, Antwerp
Technical University of Munich
Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF
Alesund Hospital
Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital
Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
Scientific Institute of Veruno

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Øyvind Ellingsen, MD, PhD, National Taiwan Normal University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 090309

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings