The Cognitive and Cerebral Blood Flow Effects of Resveratrol

May 17, 2012 updated by: Northumbria University

Effects of Resveratrol on Cerebral Blood Flow Parameters and Cognitive Performance in Humans: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Investigation

Research shows that resveratrol is able to induce vasodilation (and therefore blood flow) by interacting with nitric oxide (NO). Research also shows that acute administration of metabolic substrates, like oxygen and glucose, can enhance aspects of cognitive performance in young, healthy humans. The aim of this investigation was to determine if the consumption of resveratrol could modulate cerebral blood flow and if this in turn could influence cognitive performance by increasing access to blood borne metabolic fuel. Results showed that compared to placebo, after consuming 500mg pure trans-resveratrol, levels of total haemoglobin were significantly higher in the frontal cortex of young, healthy participants during cognitive task completion. Cognitive performance was not effected.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 8ST
        • Northumbria University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male/female,
  • Healthy
  • Age 18-35 years old
  • Non smoker
  • Proficient in English
  • Not taking any herbal or prescription medications
  • Not pregnant
  • Does not drink more than 6 cups of coffee per day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suffered a head injury, neurological disorder or neuro-developmental disorder
  • Food allergies/intolerances

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Dietary supplement: Trans- resveratrol
All 24 participants who completed the study took part in 3 conditions; receiving either 250mg resveratrol, 500mg resveratrol or placebo on separate days (with a 48hr-14day wash out period between each treatment) with the order dictated by a latin square. Treatment was administered in capsule form and in a double blind manner.
Other Names:
  • Transmax from Biotivia.
Other: Placebo (silica)
All 24 participants who completed the study took part in 3 conditions; receiving either 250mg resveratrol, 500mg resveratrol or placebo on separate days (with a 48hr-14day wash out period between each treatment) with the order dictated by a latin square. Treatment was administered in capsule form and in a double blind manner.
Other Names:
  • Pharmaceutical grade silica
Experimental: Resveratrol 250mg
Dietary supplement: Trans- resveratrol
All 24 participants who completed the study took part in 3 conditions; receiving either 250mg resveratrol, 500mg resveratrol or placebo on separate days (with a 48hr-14day wash out period between each treatment) with the order dictated by a latin square. Treatment was administered in capsule form and in a double blind manner.
Other Names:
  • Transmax from Biotivia.
Other: Placebo (silica)
All 24 participants who completed the study took part in 3 conditions; receiving either 250mg resveratrol, 500mg resveratrol or placebo on separate days (with a 48hr-14day wash out period between each treatment) with the order dictated by a latin square. Treatment was administered in capsule form and in a double blind manner.
Other Names:
  • Pharmaceutical grade silica
Experimental: Resveratrol 500mg
Dietary supplement: Trans- resveratrol
All 24 participants who completed the study took part in 3 conditions; receiving either 250mg resveratrol, 500mg resveratrol or placebo on separate days (with a 48hr-14day wash out period between each treatment) with the order dictated by a latin square. Treatment was administered in capsule form and in a double blind manner.
Other Names:
  • Transmax from Biotivia.
Other: Placebo (silica)
All 24 participants who completed the study took part in 3 conditions; receiving either 250mg resveratrol, 500mg resveratrol or placebo on separate days (with a 48hr-14day wash out period between each treatment) with the order dictated by a latin square. Treatment was administered in capsule form and in a double blind manner.
Other Names:
  • Pharmaceutical grade silica

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modulation of Levels of Total Haemoglobin
Time Frame: 0-81 mins (absorption period=1- 45 mins , post dose period 46- 81 mins)
This outcome measure provides the change from baseline values (in µmol/L) of total levels of haemoglobin during the 46-81 min post dose testing period. This was measured in the frontal cortex by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).
0-81 mins (absorption period=1- 45 mins , post dose period 46- 81 mins)
Modulation of Deoxygenated Levels of Haemoglobin
Time Frame: 0-81 mins (absorption period=1- 45 mins , post dose period 46- 81 mins)
This outcome measure provides the change from baseline values (in µmol/L) of levels of deoxygenated haemoglobin during the 46-81 min post dose testing period. This was measured in the frontal cortex by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).
0-81 mins (absorption period=1- 45 mins , post dose period 46- 81 mins)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Significant Modulation of Cognitive Performance
Time Frame: 46-81 mins post dose
This outcome measure assessed any significant modulation of cognitive task performance during the 46-81 min post dose period. The cognitive tasks utilized were cognitively demanding computer based, numerical tasks which assessed working memory. Significant modulation is defined as significant difference between baseline and post-dose task performance.
46-81 mins post dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northumbria University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 23, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22P2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings