Tysabri Effects on Cognition and Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis

September 22, 2017 updated by: University of Chicago
The long-term objective is to further establish the role of Tysabri in preventing neurological degeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to establish powerful and efficient new markers for neurological degeneration in MS. The study intends to correlate cognition with two instruments and their measurements-MRI and OCT (optical coherence tomography).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The specific aims are:

  1. To determine the effects of Tysabri on cognition (memory, thought processes, etc.)
  2. To determine the effects of Tysabri on specific MRI markers for cognitive dysfunction
  3. To determine the effects of Tysabri on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), a special instrument used in ophthalmology

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 through 60 years of age inclusive
  • Diagnosis of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
  • Prior to treatment phase, have had disease activity with at least 1 documented relapse during the previous year OR 2 documented relapses during the previous 2 years OR one or more new MRI lesions (Gd+ and/or T2 hyperintense)
  • An Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-4.5 inclusive
  • Neurologically stable with no evidence of relapse or corticosteroid treatment within 30 days prior to treatment
  • Never been treated with Tysabri/natalizumab.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Another type of MS other than relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
  • A history of chronic disease of the immune system other than MS or a known immunodeficiency syndrome/immunocompromised
  • A history or presence of cancer (except for successfully treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of skin)
  • Active systemic bacterial, viral or fungal infections, or diagnosis of AIDS, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C infection defined as a positive HIV antibody, Hepatitis B surface antigen or Hepatitis C antibody tests, respectively
  • Have received any live or live attenuated vaccines (including for varicella-zoster virus or Measles) within the last 2 months
  • Have received total lymphoid irradiation or bone marrow transplantation
  • Have been treated with: corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormones (ACTH) within the last month, IFN-β or glatiramer acetate within the last 3 months, immunosuppressive medications such as azathioprine or methotrexate within the last 6 months, immunoglobulins and/or monoclonal antibodies (including natalizumab) within the last 6 months, or cladribine, cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone at any time.
  • Any medically unstable condition or a progressive neurological disorder, other than MS, which may affect participation in the study
  • History of any clinically significant cardiac, endocrinologic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, neurologic, dermatologic, psychiatric, renal or other major disease
  • Unable to undergo MRI scans, including claustrophobia, have a pacemaker or history of hypersensitivity to gadolinium-DTPA
  • Have had a relapse within 30 days prior AND/OR not stabilized from a previous relapse
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or known drug hypersensitivity to natalizumab/Tysabri
  • A clinically significant infectious disease, such as cellulitis, pneumonia, septicemia
  • History of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy(PML)
  • Participation in any clinical research study evaluating another investigational drug or therapy within the last 6 months
  • History of Tysabri therapy
  • Abnormal screening blood test
  • Females who are not postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile or willing to practice effective contraception during the study
  • Nursing mothers, pregnant women, and women planning to become pregnant while on study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tysabri
Natalizumab 300 mg IV every 4 weeks
Drug: Tysabri
Infuse TYSABRI® 300 mg in 100 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP over approximately one hour. After the infusion is complete, flush with 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP. Tysabri will be infused every four weeks.
Other Names:
  • Natalizumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Function Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks
Cognitive function was assessed using the oral version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). The number of correct responses in 90 seconds was recorded (possible range 0-110). For analysis, SDMT scores were converted to z-scores using published age and education based norms. A negative z-score indicates a SDMT score below the mean based on the age and education based norms, for example a z-score of -2 = 2 standard deviations below the mean; a positive z-score indicating a score above the mean. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.
Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Over Time in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, 24, 48, 72, and 96 weeks
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) thickness was measured using spectral domain OCT scans by a trained technician. Scans were performed without pupil dilation.
Baseline, 24, 48, 72, and 96 weeks
Change Over Time in Brain Parenchymal Fraction
Time Frame: Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks
Measured based on MRI scan on a 3T Phillips scanner. This is a measure of brain atrophy (i.e., brain volume loss) with lower values indicating greater atrophy (possible range 0-1).
Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks
Change Over Time in Normalized Thalamic Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks
Measured on MRI scan
Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks
Change Over Time in Normalized Hippocampal Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks
Measured on MRI scan
Baseline, 48 weeks, 96 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Chicago

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Biogen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jacqueline Bernard, M.D., University of Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10-094A

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings