Methadone Versus Placebo in Spine Fusion
The Effect of Methadone on Perioperative Analgesia After Posterior Lumbar Fusion - A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hypothesis:
- We hypothesize that 0.2 mg/kg of methadone will result in decreased postoperative hydromorphone consumption compared to hydromorphone alone in opioid naïve patients or patients who are taking less than the equivalent of 15 mg IV morphine a day undergoing lumbar interbody fusion.
- We hypothesize that the incidence of opioid related postoperative side effects will not be increased by the administration of methadone in the operating room.
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA physical status I, II, and III, male and non-pregnant female
- English-speaking patients
- Ages 18-75 years
- Undergoing elective one or two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of more than the equivalent of 15 mg of IV morphine/24 hr in the past 2 weeks.
- Use of drugs within the past 6 months that effect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of opioids (i.e., benzodiazepines, anti-retroviral agents, rifampin, ketoconazole, erythromycin, or phenytoin).
- history of substance abuse at any time in the past
- known QT prolongation
- Non-elective operations (i.e., cancer or trauma)
- severe hepatic impairment (serum albumin < 3.0 g/dL in the presence of a history of liver disease)
- pregnancy
- inability to operate a patient-controlled analgesia device
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Methadone Group
0.2 mg/kg IV methadone
|
0.2 mg/kg methadone IV bolus
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
5 mL saline bolus
|
3 mL saline IV bolus
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hydromorphone postoperative opioid consumption (POC) at 48 hours
Time Frame: 48 hrs
|
PCA opioid consumption during the initial postoperative 48 hours after arriving in the PACU
|
48 hrs
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative remifentanil consumption
Time Frame: the 8 hours prior to arrival in the recovery room
|
intraoperative consumption of remifentanil--the amount of remifentanil used in the OR (i.e., the 2-8 hours prior to arrival in the recovery room)
|
the 8 hours prior to arrival in the recovery room
|
|
pain at rest and with movement (numerical Rating Scale, NRS)
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
|
|
the level of sedation (modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale, modified OAA/S scale)
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
|
|
the number of occurrences of ventilatory depression during each evaluation interval
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
|
|
number of occurrences of nausea (resulting in treatment)
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
|
|
recorded emesis
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
|
|
occurrence of pruritus
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs, 48 hrs
|
|
|
Hydromorphone postoperative opioid consumption (POC)
Time Frame: 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs
|
PCA opioid consumption at postoperative 1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs after arriving in the PACU
|
1 hr, 6 hrs, 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 36 hrs
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dhanesh K Gupta, M.D., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51.
- Apfelbaum JL, Gan TJ, Zhao S, Hanna DB, Chen C. Reliability and validity of the perioperative opioid-related symptom distress scale. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):699-709. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000133143.60584.38.
- Gourlay GK, Wilson PR, Glynn CJ. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of methadone during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1982 Dec;57(6):458-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198212000-00005. No abstract available.
- Chui PT, Gin T. A double-blind randomised trial comparing postoperative analgesia after perioperative loading doses of methadone or morphine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992 Feb;20(1):46-51. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000109.
- Upton RN, Semple TJ, Macintyre PE. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):225-44. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00005.
- Jadad AR, Browman GP. The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation. JAMA. 1995 Dec 20;274(23):1870-3.
- Taylor S, Kirton OC, Staff I, Kozol RA. Postoperative day one: a high risk period for respiratory events. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.015.
- Taylor S, Voytovich AE, Kozol RA. Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control? Am J Surg. 2003 Nov;186(5):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021.
- Liu N, Kuhlman G, Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Levron JC, Fischler M. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of intrathecal morphine, sufentanil and their combination versus IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00007.
- Joris J, Kaba A, Lamy M. Transition between anesthesia and post-operative analgesia: relevance of intra-operative administration of analgesics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2001;52(3):271-9.
- Carroll IR, Angst MS, Clark JD. Management of perioperative pain in patients chronically consuming opioids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):576-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.009.
- Yaksh TL, Hua XY, Kalcheva I, Nozaki-Taguchi N, Marsala M. The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):7680-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7680.
- Parker RK, Holtmann B, White PF. Effects of a nighttime opioid infusion with PCA therapy on patient comfort and analgesic requirements after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 1992 Mar;76(3):362-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199203000-00007.
- van Dorp EL, Kest B, Kowalczyk WJ, Morariu AM, Waxman AR, Arout CA, Dahan A, Sarton EY. Morphine-6beta-glucuronide rapidly increases pain sensitivity independently of opioid receptor activity in mice and humans. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1356-63. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a105de.
- Egan TD, Huizinga B, Gupta SK, Jaarsma RL, Sperry RJ, Yee JB, Muir KT. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics in obese versus lean patients. Anesthesiology. 1998 Sep;89(3):562-73. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809000-00004.
- Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Bernstein DP. Estimating ideal body weight--a new formula. Obes Surg. 2005 Aug;15(7):1082-3. doi: 10.1381/0960892054621350.
- Bowdle TA, Even A, Shen DD, Swardstrom M. Methadone for the induction of anesthesia: plasma histamine concentration, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jun;98(6):1692-1697. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000114085.20751.20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Postoperative Complications
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Pain, Postoperative
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Respiratory System Agents
- Antitussive Agents
- Methadone
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00027431
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.