Efficacy and Safety Study of Lomustine/Temozolomide Combination Therapy vs. Standard Therapy for Glioblastoma Patients (CeTeG)

June 13, 2017 updated by: Ulrich Herrlinger, University Hospital, Bonn

Phase III Trial of CCNU/Temozolomide (TMZ) Combination Therapy vs. Standard TMZ Therapy for Newly Diagnosed MGMT-methylated Glioblastoma Patients

The prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is dismal despite recent therapeutic improvements Using standard therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (60 Gy), the median overall survival time (mOS) is 14.6 months (Stupp et al., 2005). Since in a previous non-randomized bicentric phase II trial, primary combination chemotherapy with lomustine (CCNU) and TMZ was highly effective (mOS 23 months; UKT-03 trial; Herrlinger et al., 2006; Glas et al., 2009) the proposed trial further investigates the efficacy of CCNU/TMZ in a randomized multicenter phase III setting against standard therapy. In case the projected phase III trial confirms the phase II data, CCNU/TMZ combination would be significantly better than TMZ monotherapy and would thus be the new standard treatment for newly diagnosed GBM patients with a methylated MGMT promotor. Thus, this trial has the potential to profoundly change the standard therapy of this most aggressive brain tumor. Since in the previous trial only patients with a methylated MGMT (mMGMT) promoter had a benefit from CCNU/TMZ (mOS in the mMGMT group 34 months, in the non-mMGMT group 12.5 months; Glas et al., 2009) while patients with a non-methylated MGMT did not have any benefit, the trial is restricted to mMGMT patients.The CeTeG trial randomizes in a 1:1 fashion newly diagnosed GBM patients (18-70 years) for either standard TMZ therapy (concomitant and 6 courses à 4 weeks of adjuvant TMZ therapy) or experimental CCNU/TMZ therapy (6 courses à 6 weeks). Both arms include standard radiotherapy (RT) of the tumor site (30 x 2 Gy). Assuming that CCNU/TMZ therapy increases the median overall survival (mOS) from 48.9% (standard TMZ) to 70% (CCNU/TMZ; 75% in the previous phase II trial, Glas et al., 2009), 2 x 68 patients have to be accrued. Patients will be accrued over 24 months and each patient will be followed for at least 24 months adding up to a total minimal duration of the time from first patient in until the end of the follow-up time of 48 months. The primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, response rate, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
141

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Depatment of Neurosurgery, Charité, University Hospital Berlin
      • Bochum, Germany, 44892
        • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bochum
      • Bonn, Germany, 53105
        • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn
      • Cologne, Germany, 50937
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Dresden
      • Duesseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Duesseldorf
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60528
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Leipzig
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty of Mannheim
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster
      • Munich, Germany, 81377
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Munich (LMU)
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • patients have to be in a cognitive state that allows them to understand the rationale and necessity of study therapy and procedures.
  • newly diagnosed histologically proven GBM or gliosarcoma WHO Grad IV
  • methylated MGMT promoter in the tumor
  • estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≥ 70%
  • patient compliance and geographic proximity that allow adequate follow up
  • male and female patients with reproductive potential must use an approved contraceptive method
  • pre-menopausal female patients with childbearing potential: a negative serum pregnancy test must be obtained prior to treatment start
  • Adequate organ function as described below:

Adequate bone marrow reserve:

white blood cell (WBC) count > 3000/µl, granulocyte count >1500/µl, platelets > 100000/µl, haemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dl Adequate liver function bilirubin < 1.5 times above upper limit of normal range (ULN), ALT and AST < 3 times ULN creatinine < 1.5 times ULN

Adequate blood clotting:

PT and PTT within normal limits Negative HIV test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior malignancy
  • prior chemotherapy
  • prior radiotherapy to the brain
  • concurrent administration of any other anti-tumor therapy
  • allergy or other intolerability of temozolomide, CCNU, dacarbazine or other nitrosourea derivatives
  • unable to undergo MRI
  • past medical history of diseases with poor prognosis
  • known HIV infection, active Hepatitis B or C infection
  • any active infection
  • female patients that are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • patients with reproductive potential who do not accept to use contraception
  • treatment in another clinical trial
  • any psychological, cognitive, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up scheduled visits (at the discretion of investigator)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: lomustine (CCNU) + temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy
60 Gy standard radiotherapy (RT, 30 x 2 Gy) Six 42-day courses of oral CCNU 100 mg/m2 (day 1) and oral TMZ 100 mg/m2 (day 2-6), first CCNU application during the first week of RT CCNU/TMZ and radiotherapy start 2-5 weeks after diagnosis (day of surgery for glioblastoma (GBM)). In courses 2-6, TMZ dose are adjusted according to the hematotoxicity observed in the previous course and can be increased stepwise up to 200 mg/m2/day
Drug: Temozolomide and lomustine
Other Names:
  • Temodal, Temomedac, CeCeNu
Active Comparator: temozolomide and radiotherapy
60 Gy standard radiotherapy (RT, 30 x 2 Gy) and concomitant TMZ therapy (daily TMZ 75 mg/m2) starting with the first day of radiotherapy Six 28-day courses of TMZ (day 1-5) starting 4 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. In the first course TMZ is given at a dose of 150 mg/m2/day, in case no toxicity is observed, the 2nd course is applied at a daily dose of 200 mg/m2
Drug: Temozolomide
Other Names:
  • Temodal, Temomedac

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: after follow up (4 years)
after follow up (4 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
progression free survival
Time Frame: after follow up (4 years)
after follow up (4 years)
best response rate determined by MRI
Time Frame: after follow up (4 years)
after follow up (4 years)
frequency of delay of the next Lomustine/Temozolomide or Temozolomide course
Time Frame: during treatment period (2 years)
during treatment period (2 years)
acute toxicity during radiotherapy and chemotherapy according to CTC AE V3.0
Time Frame: during treatment period (2 years)
during treatment period (2 years)
quality of life
Time Frame: including follow up (4 years)
including follow up (4 years)
Evaluation of late neurotoxicity
Time Frame: after follow up (4 years)
after follow up (4 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Bonn

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Ulrich Herrlinger, Prof. Dr., Division of Neurooncology, Departement of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 6, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 13, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CeTeG
  • 2009-011252-22 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings