Intact Liver Innervation and Glucose and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Induced Insulin Secretion

January 5, 2012 updated by: Jonatan I Bagger, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

The Significance of Intact Liver Innervation for the Glucose and GLP-1 Induced Insulin Secretion

The aim of the study is to investigate the significance of intact nerve supply to the liver for the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) induced insulin secretion.

The hypothesis is that the effects of GLP-1 is transmitted through the GLP-1 receptor and that these effects involve sensory afferent neurons, probably primarily parasympathetic.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

GLP-1 is a potent enterogastron and incretin hormone. It is rapidly inactivated by dipeptidyl peptidase IV so only 10-15% enters the systemic circulation. This has led to the hypothesis that GLP-1 interact locally with afferent sensory nerve fibers.

The aim of this study is to investigate the significance of intact liver innervation for the GLP-1 induced insulin secretion in liver transplanted patients; kidney transplanted control patients matched for immunosuppressive treatment, age, gender and body weight; and ten control persons matched for age, gender and body weight.

The insulin secretion will be evaluated from blood samples that will be analyzed for insulin and c-peptide.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Copenhagen
      • Hellerup, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2900
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Internal Medicine F' laboratory
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Astrid Plamboeck, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • normal fasting plasma glucose
  • normal hemoglobin
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • body mass index > 30
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • intestinal surgery
  • serum creatinine > 250 µM and/or albuminuria
  • ALAT > 2 x normal value
  • Severe cardiac insufficiency
  • in treatment with medicine which cannot be paused for 12 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Liver transplanted
10 Liver transplanted patients
Drug: dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor
One tablet (50 mg)of DPP4 inhibitor is to be taken 12 and 1 hours before start of the oral glucose tolerance test (50 g glucose and 1.5 g paracetamol dissolved in 300 ml water)on day 3
Other Names:
  • Galvus
Other: oral glucose
50 grams glucose dissolved in 300 ml water with 1.5 grams paracetamol
Other Names:
  • Panodil
Other: intravenous glucose
1.5 g paracetamol dissolved in 50 ml water is to be ingested orally within the first 2 minutes. Intravenous glucose is supplied in an amount to match the plasma glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test
Other Names:
  • Panodil
Experimental: Kidney transplanted
10 kidney transplanted individuals
Drug: dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor
One tablet (50 mg)of DPP4 inhibitor is to be taken 12 and 1 hours before start of the oral glucose tolerance test (50 g glucose and 1.5 g paracetamol dissolved in 300 ml water)on day 3
Other Names:
  • Galvus
Other: oral glucose
50 grams glucose dissolved in 300 ml water with 1.5 grams paracetamol
Other Names:
  • Panodil
Other: intravenous glucose
1.5 g paracetamol dissolved in 50 ml water is to be ingested orally within the first 2 minutes. Intravenous glucose is supplied in an amount to match the plasma glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test
Other Names:
  • Panodil
Experimental: Healthy controls
10 healthy controls
Drug: dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor
One tablet (50 mg)of DPP4 inhibitor is to be taken 12 and 1 hours before start of the oral glucose tolerance test (50 g glucose and 1.5 g paracetamol dissolved in 300 ml water)on day 3
Other Names:
  • Galvus
Other: oral glucose
50 grams glucose dissolved in 300 ml water with 1.5 grams paracetamol
Other Names:
  • Panodil
Other: intravenous glucose
1.5 g paracetamol dissolved in 50 ml water is to be ingested orally within the first 2 minutes. Intravenous glucose is supplied in an amount to match the plasma glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test
Other Names:
  • Panodil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
insulin secretion
Time Frame: four hours
The insulin secretion during a four-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and an intravenous isoglycaemic clamp is evaluated
four hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
plasma glucose
Time Frame: 20 time points within four hours
20 blood samples will be drawn during the four hours OGTT and intravenous isoglycaemic clamp, most frequently during the first hour
20 time points within four hours
plasma GLP-1
Time Frame: 12 time points within four hours
12 blood samples will be drawn during the four hours OGTT and intravenous isoglycaemic clamp, most frequently during the first hour
12 time points within four hours
plasma GIP
Time Frame: 12 time points within four hours
12 blood samples will be drawn during the four hours OGTT and intravenous isoglycaemic clamp, most frequently during the first hour
12 time points within four hours
plasma glucagon
Time Frame: 12 time points within four hours
12 blood samples will be drawn during the four hours OGTT and intravenous isoglycaemic clamp, most frequently during the first hour
12 time points within four hours
plasma GLP-2
Time Frame: 12 time points within four hours
12 blood samples will be drawn during the four hours OGTT and intravenous isoglycaemic clamp, most frequently during the first hour.
12 time points within four hours
plasma PYY
Time Frame: 12 time points within four hours
12 blood samples will be drawn during the four hours OGTT and intravenous isoglycaemic clamp, most frequently during the first hour
12 time points within four hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Copenhagen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 6, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Transplant isoglycemia (AP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings