Comparing Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) to Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes (REACT3)

October 16, 2018 updated by: HealthPartners Institute

Comparison of Clinical Decisions and Outcomes Employing a Treat to Target Design for Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Randomized to Either SMBG or CGM

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of SMBG and CGM for clinical decisions related to the management of type 2 diabetes. The secondary objective is to determine the benefit of using CGM for clinical diabetes management decision-making.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study involves the use of the following 2 glucose monitoring methods to measure your blood sugar (glucose) levels and help manage type 2 diabetes:

  1. Self Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG): blood glucose is measured 4-7 times each day using finger sticks and an blood glucose meter.
  2. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM): blood glucose is measured continuously via the CGM device. This device has been approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55416
        • International Diabetes Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥18 and ≤75 years of age (Upper range to assure dexterity for use of CGM)
  • Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  • HbA1c ≥7.0%
  • Diabetes can be treated with any of the following therapies within one month prior to study enrollment: (1) medical nutrition therapy alone or with metformin; (2) sulfonylurea with or without metformin; (3) dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor or Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist with or without metformin; or insulin with or without metformin.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treated with Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
  • Administered prednisone or cortisone medications in the previous 30 days
  • Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period
  • Presence of any severe medical or psychological condition or chronic conditions/infections that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the subject's safety or successful participation in the study
  • HbA1c <7.0%
  • Unable to follow the study protocol
  • Unable to speak, read and write in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CGM Group
Wear an unblinded CGM for 16 weeks. Subjects continued previously started medication regiments for their diabetes. Subjects in this arm were randomized to use real time continuous glucose monitoring (rt CGM).
Device: CGM Group
Using CGM unblinded for 16 weeks versus fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes.
Other Names:
  • DexCom SevenPlus CGM
  • AccuChek Aviva blood glucose meter
Active Comparator: SMBG Group
Use SMBG 4 to 7 times a day for 16 weeks. Subjects continued previously started medication regiments for their diabetes. Subjects in this arm were randomized to use structured self monitoring blood glucose (stSMBG) and periodic, blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
Device: SMBG Group
Fingersticks 4 to 7 times a day to evaluate which is more beneficial in type 2 diabetes. Used CGM blinded once every four weeks.
Other Names:
  • DexCom SevenPlus CGM
  • AccuChek Aviva blood glucose meter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage Change in Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 2 week baseline to 16 week final
2 week baseline to 16 week final

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The secondary objective is to determine the incremental benefit of CGM for clinical decision-making by using (area under the diurnal median curve). Data was collected to create the curve at every hour of modal day. Example: hours 1-24 of each day. Modal day reflects 14 days worth of CGM data aggregated into a single 24 hour day graph.
16 weeks
Percent of Time in Hypoglycemia Range
Time Frame: 16 weeks

The secondary objective is to determine the incremental benefit of CGM for clinical decision-making using percent time in hypoglycemia range (< 50 mg/dL). Numerator: amount of time with a value of 49 mg/dL or less. Denominator: total amount of time of CGM measurement.

CGM used for this study produced measurements once every 15 minutes or 360 times per day.
16 weeks
Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Glucose Variability - Interquartile Range used to determine incremental benefit of CGM for clinical decision making. IQR results reflect the change delta from baseline to 16 weeks. IQR is calculated for each subject at each visit. The change in IQR was calculated as final IQR minus baseline IQR. This measure represents an average of the individual subjects IQR delta (baseline to 16 weeks/final).
Baseline and 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
HealthPartners Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Roche Diagnostics
International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Richard M. Bergenstal, MD, International Diabetes Center At Park Nicollet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 04034-10-C

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings