The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics
Research questions:
- Will the panoramic images derived from cone beam CT data give better diagnostic ability than conventional panoramic radiographs?
- Will 3D cephalometric analysis offer the orthodontists and surgeons better information for treatment planning?
- Will the 3D cephalometric analysis give more accurate treatment plan and better treatment outcome?
General hypothesis and special aims
Overall aims:
- To compare 2D versus 3D cephalometric analysis: treatment planning and therapeutic outcome.
- To determine the accuracy and diagnostic ability and usability of the 3D cephalometric analysis.
- To evaluate the diagnostic ability and usability of the panoramic image derived from cone beam CT data as compared to 2D panoramic images.
- To evaluate the value of the cone beam CT data in cephalometric analysing process for orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery treatment.
Hypotheses:
- The availability of the 3D cephalometric analysis influences the orthodontic and maxillofacial treatment plan and decision, and might change the treatment outcome.
- Panoramic images derived from cone beam CT data may provide equal information for diagnosis as conventional panoramic images.
- Cone beam CT will be able to replace "classic orthodontic imaging" being more time and dose efficient and having a beneficial effect on treatment outcome.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- University Hospital Leuven
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 12-25 years old
- Patients with malocclusions
- Patients with jaw relation defect both with or without the need of orthognathic surgery
- Patients with maxillofacial defects: tumors and trauma
- Patients with eruption problems: embedded or impacted teeth which have to be removed
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with congenital deformities
- Patients with systemic diseases that may effect the growth formation: growth factor defect and thyroid hormone defect.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
3D cephalometric analysis
|
CBCT data will be used in 3D cephalometric analysis softwares
|
|
2D cephalometric analysis
|
2D images that are used for orthodontic treatment planning
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cephalometric analysis
Time Frame: at treatment planning step and after 2 years of treatment
|
linear and angular cephalometric measurement
|
at treatment planning step and after 2 years of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
outcome of orthodontic treatment
Time Frame: after 2 years of treatment
|
after 2 years of treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035.
- Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):707-30, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005.
- Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981 Apr;51(2):115-50. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)0512.0.CO;2. No abstract available.
- Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3-D cephalometry Part I: the anatomic Cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Mar;17(2):314-25. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200603000-00019.
- Olszewski R, Cosnard G, Macq B, Mahy P, Reychler H. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software. Neuroradiology. 2006 Nov;48(11):853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0140-x. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
- Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, Hildebolt CF, Tyndall D, Shrout M; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):561-2. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.007. No abstract available.
- Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Apr;31(2):129-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn088. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
- Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
- de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.039. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
- Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.
- Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):150-7. doi: 10.2319/122407-599.1.
- Olszewski R, Tanesy O, Cosnard G, Zech F, Reychler H. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;38(3):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
- Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr., Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed, Mosby Inc., Elsevier Science, Philadelphia, 2006.
- White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):689-705, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.006.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- S52731
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
NCT07162753RecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07466641RecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07404696Not yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | Overjet
-
NCT07383259Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07179354CompletedClass III Skeletal Malocclusion
-
NCT07243509CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
-
NCT04376190Completed
-
NCT07405905Recruiting
-
NCT06631131CompletedClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1
-
NCT04972084Completed3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1
Clinical Trials on Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)
-
NCT02403700Completed
-
NCT05922410Not yet recruitingMaxillary Sinus | Cone-beam Computed Tomography | Anatomical Variations
-
NCT04039776CompletedPatello Femoral Syndrome
-
NCT02810184Active, not recruiting
-
NCT03635203UnknownC-shaped Root Canal
-
NCT01594151CompletedControlled Asthma
-
NCT02892552Completed
-
NCT01594164CompletedChanges in Upper Airway Geometry