A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Effects of Bisoprolol and Atenolol on Resting Heart Rate and Sympathetic Nervous System's Activity in Subjects With Essential Hypertension

January 25, 2017 updated by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Effects of Bisoprolol and Atenolol on Resting Heart Rate and Sympathetic Nervous System's Activity in Patients With Essential Hypertension

This is a Phase 4, prospective, multi-centric and randomized controlled study to compare the effects of bisoprolol and atenolol on resting heart rate (RHR) and sympathetic nervous system's (SNS) activity in subjects with essential hypertension.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
177

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Shi Jingshan Hospital
      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Institute of Hypertension

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged between 25-65 years
  • Subjects with essential hypertension (EH)
  • Subjects with systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140-160 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-100 mmHg
  • Subjects with normal sinus rhythm
  • Subjects with resting heart rate (RHR) greater than 70 bpm
  • Subjects who give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with atrial fibrillation (AF)/sick sinus syndrome (SSS)/atrioventricular block II-III Grade (AVB II-III) without pacemaker
  • Subjects with bradyarrhythmia/hypotension
  • Subjects with unstable angina pectoris (UAP)/acute myocardial infarction (AMI)/heart failure (HF) (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III - IV)
  • Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM)
  • Subjects with bronchial asthma
  • Subjects with gastro-intestinal ulcer or skin ulcer
  • Subjects with liver dysfunction/renal impairment
  • Subjects treated with calcium channel blockers (except amlodipine) or other beta-blockers.
  • Subjects with glaucoma
  • Subjects with known allergic/intolerance to beta-blocker
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Subjects who had participated in another clinical study within the last 3 months
  • Subjects who have legal incapacity or limited legal capacity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Bisoprolol
Drug: Bisoprolol
Bisoprolol will be administered at a dose of 5 milligram (mg) once daily for 2 weeks. If heart rate is less than or equal to 65 beats per minute (bpm), then the initial dose will be administered for another 2 weeks. If the heart rate remains greater than 65 bpm, then the dose will be further increased to 7.5 mg once daily for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, if the heart rate is less than or equal to 65 bpm, the increased dose will be administered for another 2 weeks. If the heart rate is still greater than 65 bpm, then the dose will be further increased to 10 mg once daily for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, if the heart rate is less than or equal to 65 bpm, the increased dose will be administered for another 2 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Concor®
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Atenolol
Drug: Atenolol
Atenolol will be administered at a dose of 50 mg once daily for 2 weeks. If heart rate is less than or equal to 65 bpm, then the initial dose will be administered for another 2 weeks. If the heart rate remains greater than 65 bpm, then the dose will be further increased to 75 mg once daily for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, if the heart rate is less than or equal to 65 bpm, the increased dose will be administered for another 2 weeks. If the heart rate still greater than 65 bpm, then the dose will be further increased to 100 mg once daily for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, If the heart rate is less than or equal to 65 bpm, the increased dose will be administered for another 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal
Time Frame: Baseline and attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is an important characteristic of baroreflex control and often noninvasively assessed by relating heart rate (HR) fluctuations to blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 beats per minute (bpm).
Baseline and attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Change From Baseline in Baroreflex Sensitivity (BRS) at End of Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is an important characteristic of baroreflex control and often noninvasively assessed by relating heart rate (HR) fluctuations to blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
Baseline and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) and for High Frequency Power (HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Heart rate variability (HRV) is used to describe the variations of both instantaneous HR and resting rate (RR) intervals and was evaluated for low frequency power (LF) and for high frequency power (HF). Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
Baseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) for Low Frequency Power (LF) to Heart Rate Variability Power (HRV) for High Frequency (HF) (LF/HF) at Attainment of Heart Rate Goal and End of Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Heart rate variability (HRV) is used to describe the variations of both instantaneous HR and resting rate (RR) intervals and was evaluated for low frequency power (LF) and for high frequency power (HF). Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
Baseline, attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6) and end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Number of Participants Attaining Heart Rate Goal at Dosage 1, 2 and 3 of Study Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Dosage 1, 2 and 3 for bisoprolol group was defined as 5 mg, 7.5 mg and 10 mg once daily and for atenolol group as 50 mg, 75 mg and 100 mg once daily, respectively. Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
Baseline up to attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Percentage of Participants Attaining Heart Rate Goal at Week 2, 4 and 6
Time Frame: Attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Heart rate goal was defined as attainment of heart rate less than or equal to 65 bpm.
Attainment of heart rate goal (Week 2 or Week 4 or Week 6)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: Any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition
Baseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Number of Participants Compliant With Study Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)
Participants compliant with study treatment were the participants who have completed the study treatment regimen.
Baseline up to end of follow-up (Week 4 or Week 6 or Week 8)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Merck Serono Co., Ltd., China

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gao Pingjin, Prof., Shanghai Institute of Hypertension

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 30, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EMR200006-515

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings