Rejuvenate Modular Outcomes Study

February 15, 2022 updated by: Stryker Orthopaedics

A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Rejuvenate® Modular Hip System

This study will be an evaluation of the Rejuvenate® Modular Hip System for primary total hip replacement (THR) with a cementless application in a consecutive series of patients who meet the eligibility criteria. Subjects will be evaluated for freedom of hip revision at 5 years and clinical outcomes for up to 10 years after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Dearborn, Michigan, United States, 48124
        • Oakwood Healthcare
    • Minnesota
      • Sartell, Minnesota, United States, 56377
        • St. Cloud Orthopaedics Associates
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74104
        • The Orthopedic Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has signed an IRB approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
  • Patient is a male or non-pregnant female age 18 years or older at time of study device implantation.
  • Patient has primary diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease (NIDJD).
  • Patient is a candidate for a primary cementless total hip replacement.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.
  • Patient's operative femur templates to Rejuvenate® Modular Stem size 7-12.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40.
  • Patient has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the affected hip joint at time of study device implantation.
  • Patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits the ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.
  • Patient is diagnosed with a systemic disease (e.g. Lupus Erythematosus) or a metabolic disorder (e.g. Paget's Disease) leading to progressive bone deterioration.
  • Patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements (e.g. > 30 days).
  • Patient requires revision surgery of a previously implanted total hip replacement or hip fusion to the affected joint.
  • Patient has a known sensitivity to device materials.
  • Patient is a prisoner.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: Rejuvenate Modular Hip System
Rejuvenate Modular Hip
Device: Rejuvenate Modular Hip
Rejuvenate Modular Hip

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival Rate of the Rejuvenate Modular Stem/Neck
Time Frame: 5 years postoperative
The success rate is defined as freedom from Rejuvenate Modular femoral stem/neck construct revision/removal for any reason.
5 years postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomechanical Measurement of Femoral Offset
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change from Preoperative Natural Femoral Offset to Postoperative Femoral Offset at 6-weeks postoperative measured in millimeters.
6 weeks
Biomechanical Measurement of the Vertical Distance of the Planned Hip Center of Rotation
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change from preoperative vertical distance of the anatomic hip center to the planned center of rotation of the hip to the postoperative distance from the planned center of rotation at 6 weeks measured in millimeters.
6 weeks
Biomechanical Measurement of the Horizontal Distance of the Planned Hip Center of Rotation
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change from preoperative horizontal distance of the anatomic hip center to the planned center of rotation of the hip to the postoperative distance from the planned center of rotation at 6 weeks measured in millimeters.
6 weeks
Mean Harris Hip Score at Each Visit
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 year

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) assesses pain, function, joint deformity and range of motion. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor.

90-100 = excellent 80-89 = good 70-79 = fair 0-69 = poor
pre-op, 6 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 year
Mean SF-12 Scores at Each Visit
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 year
The SF-12 Health Survey is a 12-item patient completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being. It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100. Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
pre-op, 6 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 year
Mean Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) Scores at Each Visit
Time Frame: pre-op, 6 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 year
The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level.
pre-op, 6 wk, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 year
Occurrence of Subsidence at Six Weeks, Stem Migration, Unstable Fixation and Radiographic Instability (Radiolucency)
Time Frame: 6 wks,1,2,3,4,5 yrs
Radiographic stability of the stem is defined as having the following: no radiographic indication of progressive radiolucent lines greater than or equal to 2 mm around the entire femoral component, and no radiographic indication of progressive subsidence of the femoral component of great than or equal to 5 mm. Only subsidence was measured at 6 weeks, migration and fixation are analyzed beginning at 1 year postoperative.
6 wks,1,2,3,4,5 yrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stryker Orthopaedics

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yogesh Mittal, M.D., The Orthopedic Center
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Nessler, M.D., St. Cloud Orthopaedic Associates
  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence Morawa, M.D., Oakwood Healthcare System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 6, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 68

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Clinical Trials on Rejuvenate Modular Hip

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings