Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis by Array-Based Copy Number Analysis (Microarray)

August 21, 2012 updated by: Ronald J Wapner, MD, Columbia University
The main objective of the multi-centered collaborative study is to evaluate the accuracy, efficacy and clinical advantages of prenatal diagnosis using microarray analysis as compared with conventional karyotyping.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Specifically, the aims are as follows:

  1. Demonstrate the performance of microarray analysis as a clinical method for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis with regard to:

    1. Accuracy in the detection of the common autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploid (trisomies, 13,18,21, 45,X, 47,XXY, etc.)
    2. Ability of microarray to diagnose less common, but clinically significant, cytogenetic aneusomies (e.g. DiGeorge, Williams, Smith- Magenis, Prader-Willi syndrome, etc.) currently not detected by conventional karyotype.
    3. Evaluation of the utility of microarray in specific clinical scenarios such as ultrasound detection of congenital anomalies and fetal growth disorders.
  2. Evaluate the appropriate construction of prenatal diagnostic microarray devices to allow maximal detection of clinically relevant information with minimal detection of unexpected and difficult to interpret findings which have no clinical significance but might provoke patient anxiety.
  3. Evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using microarrays as a primary prenatal diagnostic tool.
  4. Evaluate approaches to integrate microarray into clinical prenatal cytogenetic diagnostic practice.
  5. Develop a prenatal diagnostic tissue repository (TDR) to facilitate the further development of microarray technology. This will be used to investigate the molecular etiologies of specific fetal anomalies and to test newer technologies, such as higher resolution microarrays.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 4,400 prenatal diagnostic samples will be obtained from patients undergoing prenatal testing for standard indications. Patients will be recruited at participating prenatal diagnostic centers by designated study personnel; recruitment of patients will be initiated as a pilot study. These patients will not contribute to the final planned sample size of 4400 patients. Two sub-studies will then be initiated consisting of 250 (or more) patients enrolled with sufficient amniotic fluid sample and 250 (or more) patients with sufficient villus sample.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Singleton pregnancy having either chorionic villus sampling in the first trimester or an amniocentesis procedure at or after 16 weeks of gestation performed for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis
  2. Karyotyping to be performed at Genzyme Genetics Cytogenetics Laboratory
  3. Trained study personnel available
  4. Presenting at pre-specified sites using Genzyme Genetics for routine prenatal diagnostic services

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unavailability of one or both biologic parents to provide blood sample (e.g. egg or sperm donor, non-paternity)
  2. Patient refusal to allow follow-up through the neonatal period and up to age two if selected
  3. Participation in the study in a previous pregnancy
  4. Insufficient sample for microarray assay

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Microarray Analysis
Genetic: Microarray analysis

Microarray performed on prenatal specimen:

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) or other standardized tests such as qPCR or MLPA will be performed on the fetal sample to confirm abnormal MA findings of known and unknown clinical significance which are discordant with CC findings, including anomalies normally detected by karyotyping.

Microarray analysis of DNA from parental blood samples will be used to determine whether CNVs detected in a fetal sample are also present in a healthy parent, in which case no further evaluation will take place, moreover any finding in a fetus which is duplicated in a parental microarray is considered to be confirmed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection rate of fetal cytogentic abnormalites between microarray copy number analysis and karyotype in prenatal samples
Time Frame: Up to 2.5 years after recruitment of 4400 patients.
This is a blinded prospective comparison of microarray copy number analysis to metaphase karyotyping for the detection of common fetal cytogentic abnormalites
Up to 2.5 years after recruitment of 4400 patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The ability of microarray copy number analysis to identify clinically significant microdeletions and duplications not seen by standard karyotyping
Time Frame: Up to 2.5 years .
This outcome will identify the frequency of clinically significant microdeletions and microduplications that are identified on microarray CNA that were not seen on the clinical karyotype. Only copy number variants over 1 Mb in the backbone and those in predesignated critical regions will be included
Up to 2.5 years .
The rates of clinically significant copy number variants associated with specific prenatal conditions
Time Frame: Up to 2.5 years after recruitment of 4400 patients.
THe frequency of clinically significant copy number variants in cases with fetal anomalies, advanced maternal age, positve serum screening, and fetal growth disorders will be determined.
Up to 2.5 years after recruitment of 4400 patients.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 22, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAC8036
  • 1R01HD055651-01 (NIH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Genetic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Microarray analysis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings