Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Hip Arthroscopy. A Randomized Controlled Trial (LPB Hip Scope)

May 1, 2013 updated by: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a lumbar plexus block for arthroscopic hip surgery is superior to oral and intravenous opioid pain medications alone in treating pain. In addition, the study will examine whether lumbar plexus blocks reduce the total amount of pain medication needed, and therefore reduce the side effects of these medicines and increase patient satisfaction. It is hypothesized that addition of the lumbar plexus block will significantly reduce patients' postoperative pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
83

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • New York Presbyterian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 1-3
  • Patients aged 18 to 65 years
  • Patients scheduled for primary, unilateral arthroscopic hip surgery by Dr. Kelly, Dr. Coleman, or Dr. Anil Ranawat
  • Planned use of neuraxial anesthesia
  • Body Mass Index less than 35
  • Ability to follow study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic opioid use (defined as daily or almost daily use of opioids for >3 months)
  • Contraindication to combined spinal-epidural anesthesia including but not limited to bleeding disorder, use of clinically relevant anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, and anatomic abnormalities.
  • Contraindication to lumbar plexus block including but not limited to bleeding disorder, use of clinically relevant anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications, and anatomic abnormalities.
  • Infection at the injection site(s)
  • Allergy to any of the study medications
  • Contraindication to a short course of NSAIDs (renal failure, intolerance)
  • ASA Class 4-5
  • Patient refusal
  • Patients younger than 18 years old and older than 65
  • Patients with any known indwelling hardware of the lumbar spine.
  • Patients with a peripheral neuropathy of the surgical extremity
  • Non-English speaking patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lumbar Plexus Blockade + CSE
The study group will receive a lumbar plexus blockade with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, followed by a combined spinal-epidural.
Procedure: Lumbar Plexus Blockade
The lumbar plexus block will be dosed with 30 milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
The control group will receive only a combined spinal-epidural.
Procedure: Control
The control group will receive only a combined spinal-epidural.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain at Rest (0-10) on Day of Surgery Prior to Discharge
Time Frame: Day of surgery prior to discharge
The Numeric Rating Scale was used to ask patients to rate their pain at rest on a scale of 0 to 10, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Day of surgery prior to discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readiness to Discharge From Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Time Frame: Day of surgery prior to discharge
Time to readiness for discharge from the PACU. Patients were considered ready for PACU discharge when they met the following criteria: a) Awake, alert, oriented and responsive b) Minimal pain, Numeric Rating Scale < 5/10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) (parenteral [injected] medications not required) c) Vital signs stable d) No active bleeding e) Minimal or no nausea f) Not vomiting, tolerating oral intake g) Oxygen saturation > 94% (or baseline) on room air h) Patient has urinated.
Day of surgery prior to discharge
Narcotic Pain Medication Needed
Time Frame: Day of surgery prior to discharge
Day of surgery prior to discharge
Incidence of Nausea
Time Frame: Day of surgery prior to discharge
The number of participants with nausea.
Day of surgery prior to discharge
Incidence of Vomiting
Time Frame: Day of surgery prior to discharge
The number of participants who vomited.
Day of surgery prior to discharge
Requirement of Antiemetic Rescue
Time Frame: Day of surgery prior to discharge
The number of participants who needed medication to treat their nausea and vomiting.
Day of surgery prior to discharge
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
Patient Satisfaction (0-10; 0 = very dissatisfied, 10 = very satisfied)
First 24 hours after surgery
Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) Physical Comfort Dimension
Time Frame: First 24 hours after surgery
Assessment of Physical Comfort (minimum score = 12, maximum score = 60). Higher values represent a better outcome
First 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
New York Presbyterian Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 31, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10038 (DAIDS ES)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings