Proof-of-concept (PoC) Study of APD515

May 15, 2013 updated by: Acacia Pharma Ltd

Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Proof-of-concept Study of APD515 Solution for Oromucosal and Oral Administration for Relief of Xerostomia in Patients With Cancer

A study to look at the effectiveness of a drug called APD515, designed to be applied to the lining inside the mouth, at relieving dryness of the mouth. Study will compare one week of treatment with APD515 to one week of treatment with matching placebo to see which has better effect on patient's mouth dryness, according to their own score.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • University of Copenhagen
      • Hillerød, Denmark
        • Hillerød Hospital
      • Århus, Denmark
        • Århus University Hospital
  • United Kingdom
      • Cheltenham, United Kingdom
        • Sue Ryder Leckhampton Court Hospice
      • Coventry, United Kingdom
        • Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
      • Guildford, United Kingdom
        • Royal Surrey County Hospital
      • Mansfield, United Kingdom
        • John Eastwood Hospice
      • Norwich, United Kingdom
        • Priscilla Bacon Lodge
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom
        • City Hospital Hayward House Specialist Palliative Care Unit
      • Scarborough, United Kingdom
        • Scarborough General Hospital
      • Shrewsbury, United Kingdom
        • Severn Hospice

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 18 years
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent.
  • Confirmed primary neoplasm at any site (apart from non-melanoma skin cancers), for which first-line cytotoxic therapy has been completed more than one month prior to study entry. Ongoing palliative, hormonal, cytostatic or "targeted" (e.g., monoclonal antibody, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, etc) therapy is permitted, provided that the risk of oral mucositis in the subject is not judged to be significant.
  • Subjective complaint of dry mouth, ongoing for at least two weeks prior to study entry.
  • Capacity for salivary stimulation, as demonstrated by stimulated whole saliva flow rate > unstimulated whole saliva flow rate.
  • Karnofsky performance score ≥ 60% or ECOG performance status ≤ 2.

  • Adequate renal and hepatic function and hydration status:

    • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 5 * upper limit normal (ULN);
    • Serum urea < 1.5 * ULN and serum urea:creatinine ratio < 100 (where urea and creatinine expressed in the same units);
    • Plasma sodium ≤ ULN.

  • Adequate haematological function:

    • Haemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL;
    • White blood count ≥ 1.0 * 10^9/L;
    • Platelet count ≥ 50 *x 10^9/L.
  • For females of child-bearing potential: ability and willingness to use a highly effective form of contraception (e.g., abstinence from sexual intercourse, surgical sterilisation (of subject or partner) or a double-barrier method of contraception such as either an intra-uterine device (IUD) or an occlusive cap with spermicide, in conjunction with partner's use of a condom) during the study and for a period of at least 48 hours afterwards.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome.
  • Prior radiotherapy for head & neck cancer, or other substantial doses of radiation delivered to the area of the mouth or salivary glands.
  • Significant, symptomatic disease of the oral cavity, including oral candidosis or oral mucositis.
  • Allergy to active ingredient or any of the excipients of APD515.
  • Use of oral or topical (including ocular) pilocarpine or cevimeline in the two weeks prior to enrolment.
  • Concomitant use of procainamide, quinidine or ganglionic blocking agents such as mecamylamine, pentolinium and trimethaphan.
  • Intestinal or urinary obstruction.
  • Myocardial infarction or intestinal anastomosis within the previous 6 months.
  • Participation in an investigational drug or device study within 1 month prior to study entry.
  • For female subjects only, a positive pregnancy test.
  • Any condition or disease detected during the medical interview/physical examination that would render the subject unsuitable for the study, place the subject at undue risk or interfere with the ability of the subject to complete the study in the opinion of the Investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
qds for 7 days
Experimental: APD515
Active APD515 treatment 20 mg qds for 7 days
Drug: APD515
20 mg oromucosal-oral administration qds for 7 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Xerostomia score
Time Frame: 1 week
Change in score on 100 mm visual analogue scale
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Acacia Pharma Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 15, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DX10008

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings