A Clinical Comparison of Marketed Lens Care Solutions With Avaira Lens Brand
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43213
- Erdey/Searcy Eye Group
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed Consent and HIPAA document read, signed, and dated.
- Visual acuity correctable to 20/30 (Snellen) or better in each eye at distance with hydrogel or silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
- Successfully wearing hydrogel or silicone hydrogel contact lenses on a daily wear basis for at least two weeks prior to the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of hypersensitivity
- Evidence or history of epithelial herpes simplex keratitis (dendritic keratitis; vaccinia, active or recent varicella, viral disease of the cornea and/or conjunctiva and/or eyelids; bacterial infection of the eye; and/or fungal disease of the eye
- One functional eye or a monofit eye
- Ocular conditions such as active acute blepharitis, conjunctival infections, and iritis
- Type 2 (macropunctate) or greater corneal staining in any region in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period
- Sum of the type of corneal staining greater than or equal to 4 across entire cornea in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period
- Conjunctival staining covering greater than or equal to 20% in 2 or more corneal regions in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period
- Conjunctival injection greater than Grade 2 (moderate-diffuse redness) in either eye as observed by slit-lamp at Visit 1 of each study period
- Abnormal lenticular opacity in the visual axis of the lens in either eye
- Use of concomitant topical Rx or over-the-counter (OTC) ocular medications
- History of seasonal allergies with significant ocular side effects which may have an adverse impact on contact lens wear
- Pregnant or lactating females
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Multipurpose Solution #1
B&L Renu Fresh Multipurpose Solution
|
B&L Renu Fresh Multipurpose Solution
Optifree Replenish Multipurpose Solution
Ciba ClearCare Multipurpose Solution
Saline Solution
|
|
Experimental: Multipurpose Solution #2
OptiFree Replenish Multipurpose Solution
|
B&L Renu Fresh Multipurpose Solution
Optifree Replenish Multipurpose Solution
Ciba ClearCare Multipurpose Solution
Saline Solution
|
|
Experimental: Multipurpose Solution #3
Ciba ClearCare Multipurpose Solution
|
B&L Renu Fresh Multipurpose Solution
Optifree Replenish Multipurpose Solution
Ciba ClearCare Multipurpose Solution
Saline Solution
|
|
Active Comparator: Multipurpose Solution #4
Saline Solution
|
B&L Renu Fresh Multipurpose Solution
Optifree Replenish Multipurpose Solution
Ciba ClearCare Multipurpose Solution
Saline Solution
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Staining Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour Period
|
Severity of staining was recorded for each region using a scale of 0-none to 4-patch >/=1mm.
Analysis of staining was performed by averaging the scores from the five regions for each eye, then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit.
Mean total severity was calcuated from all identified eyes for each visit.
|
Baseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour Period
|
|
Corneal Staining Area
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour Period
|
Analysis of staining area was performed by averaging the values from the five regions for each eye and then identifying the subject's worse eye at each visit.
Mean total area was calculated from all identified eyes for each visit.
|
Baseline, 2 Hour Period, 4 Hour Period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Comfort
Time Frame: Visit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hours
|
Subjective comfort ratings 0-100 (0=causes pain, 100=excellent comfort)
|
Visit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hours
|
|
Subjective Dryness
Time Frame: Visit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hours
|
Subjective dryness ratings 0-100 (0=extremely dry, 100=extremely moist)
|
Visit 1: Baseline; Visit 2: 2 hours, Visit 3: 4 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gary Andrasko, OD, MS, Erdey/Searcy Eye Group
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CV-09-64, Sterling IRB 3576
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.