Association of Formaldehyde Exposure to Myeloid Leukemia in Workers in Guangdong, China

November 9, 2020 updated by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Studies of Myeloid Progenitor Cells in Workers Exposed to Formaldehyde, a Putative Leukemogen

Background:

  • Research suggests that occupational exposure to formaldehyde is associated with increased risk for myeloid leukemia, but the significance of these findings is uncertain because of inconsistencies among studies and lack of knowledge of how formaldehyde can cause leukemia.
  • Damage to the DNA of myeloid cells (type of white blood cell) or an environmental factor not affecting the cell genetic machinery may be involved.

Objective: To determine if formaldehyde exposure is associated with genetic or other changes in myeloid cells.

Eligibility: Workers exposed to high levels of formaldehyde and unexposed workers in Guangdong Province, China.

Design:

  • 40 exposed workers and 40 unexposed workers will be enrolled.
  • Subjects wear small instruments at work that measure chemicals in the air for 1 or 2 days.
  • Subjects have a brief physical examination and provide blood, urine, and mouth rinse samples.
  • Subjects answer a questionnaire about work, smoking and drinking, use of medicines, medical history, general health, exposure to radiation and exposure to various substances at home.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Research in industrial workers and professionals exposed to formaldehyde suggests that occupational exposure to this important chemical is associated with increased risk for myeloid leukemia. The significance, however, of these observations for occupational and environmental health is uncertain because of inconsistencies among epidemiologic studies and lack of a demonstrated mechanism through which formaldehyde can cause leukemia. Cytogenetic damage is one potential leukemogenic mechanism, but there are few studies of formaldehyde-exposed humans. Some experimental data suggest that epigenetic changes in myeloid cells could also be involved. We plan to study 40 workers exposed to high levels of formaldehyde and 40 unexposed controls to examine the hypothesis that formaldehyde is associated with these changes. To determine formaldehyde exposure, we will incorporate a number of methods, including questionnaires to determine potential past exposure and on-site monitoring to determine current average and peak intensities of exposure. We will then examine differences in aneuploidy and structural abnormalities in myeloid progenitor cells cultured from peripheral blood. We will specifically look for differences in genes associated with myeloid leukemia such as monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 using interphase and Octochrome FISH. We will also determine whether aberrant methylation in progenitor cells, specifically hypermethylation of genes associated with myeloid leukemia, is higher in those exposed to formaldehyde. This study will substantially contribute to our understanding of the leukemogenic potential of formaldehyde, which has important public health and regulatory implications.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
94

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Guangdong National Poison Control Center (NPCC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We identified one factory that produced formaldehyde-melamine resins and one factory that used formaldehyde-melamine resins to manufacture plastic utensils. Monitoring of formaldehyde levels was performed in these factories during an initial screening and it was established that there were no other exposures to known or suspected leukemogens or hematotoxicants (e.g., benzene, phenol, chlorinated solvents). We selected a control population from three workplaces in the same @@@geographic region as factories with formaldehyde exposure and enrolled workers who had comparable demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and who were engaged primarily in manufacturing. Detailed inspection of the control workplaces did not identify potential for occupational exposure to formaldehyde or any other@@@hematotoxic or genotoxic chemicals in excess of exposure levels in the general population.

Description

  • Subjects will be recruited from a factory that manufactures plastic utensils and that has had a stable manufacturing process for the past five years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
1
Workers exposed to high levels of formaldehyde and unexposed workers in Guangdong Province, China.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematotoxicity change
Time Frame: 2006-2034
This study will determine if formaldehyde is associated with epigenetic changes in myeloid progenitor cells, including global methylation and hypermethylation in genes that have been linked to myeloid leukemia (ML) such as p15, HIC1, ER, CDH1 and ABL.
2006-2034
Leukemia-specific chromsome change
Time Frame: 28 years
This study will determine if formaldehyde exposure is associated with aneuploidy in myeloid progenitor cells using interphase-FISH, with a particular focus on monosomy of chromosome 7 and aneuploidy of other relevant chromosomes, such as trisomy 8; and if formaldehyde exposure is associated with increased levels of structural aberrations relevant for myeloid leukemogenesis [e.g., 5q-] in myeloid progenitor cells using OctoChrome FISH, which will evaluate aberrations in all 24chromosomes.
28 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 10, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 6, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 999906178
  • 06-C-N178

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings