Randomized Open-label Trial to Compare Efficacy and Tolerance of Corticosteroids and IVIg (PRNC)

September 25, 2014 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Multicentre Randomized Open-label Trial to Compare Efficacy and Tolerance of Corticosteroids and IVIg in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy on a One Year Follow up

Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a challenge because disease may generate important disability in patients including young adults. Randomized trials showed that corticosteroids, plasma exchanges and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can reduce impairment on a short term period but the treatment of a chronic disease doesn't agree with it. Corticosteroids and IVIg are the first line CIDP treatments. No study permits to demonstrate the superiority of one treatment to the other. Long term adverse effects of corticosteroids and IVIg cost are the respective limitation of their use. The investigators scheduled to recruit 40 CIDP patients in 23 French centres to receive either 0,8mg/kg/day of prednisone progressively tapered over 6 months or a monthly 2g/kg cure of IVIg during 6 months. Patients will be followed during 6 months after the treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • CHU clermont-ferrand
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • CHU Dijon
      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Chu Grenoble
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Hôpital Neurologique de Lyon
      • Marseille, France, 13000
        • CHU Marseille
      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • CHU Nancy
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • CHU Nantes
      • Nice, France, 06000
        • CHU NICE
      • Saint-etienne, France, 42100
        • Chu Saint-Etienne
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • CHU Strasbourg
      • Valence, France, 26000
        • Centre Hospitalier de Valence

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Man or woman between 18 and 80, Weight ≤ 100 kg,

CIDP diagnosis:

  • stable or deteriorated state (no spontaneous improvement),
  • with the following features:
  • motor or sensory and motor deficits, and reduced or abolished tendon reflexes,
  • progressive or relapsing evolution,
  • global symmetric disability in more than one limb,
  • disease course installation over at least 2 months,
  • cerebrospinal fluid with ≤10/µL white blood cells and > 0.5 g/L protein rate (non compulsory examination),
  • electrophysiological or histological signs of demyelinization,
  • INCAT disability score ≥ 2 in arms or ≥ 1 in legs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe electrophysiological axonal damage,
  • Pure motor syndrome,
  • Spontaneous improvement,
  • Associated systemic disease that could be the cause of neuropathy,
  • Severe cardiac insufficiency,
  • Cardiac arrhythmia,
  • Severe cardiopulmonary pathology,
  • Inflammatory syndrome,
  • Severe physical disease which can interfere with the trial,
  • Patient in a strict salt-free diet,
  • A clinically significant abnormal biological result,
  • Positive serology in one of the following tests: HIV1, HIV2, A-B-C hepatitis, Hbs antigen, Lyme disease,
  • IgA complete deficiency,
  • History of anaphylactic reaction during previous IVIg infusion,
  • Hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 3g/L),
  • Creatinine clearance < 80 mL/min,
  • Evolutive gastroduodenal ulcer, diabetes, serious infectious condition, evolutive virus disease (hepatite, herpes, varicella, zona), psychotic states not controlled by treatment, veinous or arterial thrombosis, non controlled high blood pressure, osteoporosis,
  • Patient previously treated by corticosteroids, IVIg, plasma exchanges or any other immunosuppressive agent within 3 months before inclusion, except for azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil which were tolerated in the case of the dose being unmodified within 3 months and kept unchanged during the trial,
  • Experienced failure with a IVIG or prednisone prior treatment,
  • Hypersensitivity to any components of the 2 treatments,
  • Unsigned informed consent,
  • Ongoing or planned pregnancy (mandatory pregnancy test at the screening visit), breastfeeding, effective contraception for over 3 months for women of childbearing age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: immunoglobulin
patient who received monthly 2g/kg cure of intravenous Immunoglobulin during 6 months
Drug: Immunoglobulin perfusion
patient who received monthly 2g/kg intravenous cure of immunoglobulin
Active Comparator: prednisone
patient who received 0,8mg/kg/day of prednisone progressively tapered over 6 months
Drug: Prednisone
patient who received 0,8mg/kg/day of prednisone progressively tapered over 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Main outcome
Time Frame: 3 months

Rate of patients with a decreased INCAT score of at least 1 point after 3 months of treatment,

  • Responders: ≥ 1 point improvement in the INCAT score at 3 months in comparison to baseline,
  • Non responders: unchanged INCAT score at 3 months in comparison to baseline or patients for whom the primary endpoint can't be assessed because of the occurrence of an adverse event requiring treatment stop.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
Rate of cured patients i.e. INCAT score of 0 in legs and ≤ 1 in arms after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months,
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Philippe CAMDESSANCHE, Dr, CHU de Saint-Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0201084
  • 031213 (Other Identifier: AFSSAPS)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings