Comparing Cetaphil Restoraderm System Versus Standard Skin Care in Infants

January 30, 2020 updated by: Eric Simpson, Oregon Health and Science University

A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Cetaphil® Restoraderm® System and Standard Skin Care in Infants at Risk for Atopic Dermatitis

The goal of this study is to determine what effect Cetaphil® Restoraderm® system has on babies' skin versus Johnson & Johnson baby lotion and skin cleanser.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects will randomly be divided into a group using Cetaphil® Restoraderm® system or a group using Johnson & Johnson baby lotion and skin cleanser . At 3, 6, and 12 months non-invasive measurements of barrier function will be used to test the babies' skin. The procedures are as follows:

  • Transepidermal loss (TEWL - measures the water loss from the skin)
  • Skin electrical capacitance (measures how much water stays in the top layer of skin)
  • Skin pH (measures level of pH)
  • Skin microbiome analysis (skin swabs to check genetic code of skin bacteria)
  • Lipidomic and natural moisturizing factor analysis (measures lipids (oils) in the top layer of skin)

Both groups will be reminded to follow the instructions about general good skin care of infants. Subjects will be asked if they agree to provide a saliva sample. If yes, a saliva sample will be collected from the inside of the infant's cheek at the 6 month visit and will be shipped to the laboratory of Dr. Irwin McLean at the University of Dundee, where it will be tested for gene defects in the skin barrier that might trigger the development of eczema. Defects in the gene called filaggrin have been shown to increase the risk of developing eczema. The samples will be identified by a code to protect your infant's identity. The saliva samples will be stored only for this study, and then the sample will be destroyed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health & Science University Center for Health & Healing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 3 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants up to three weeks of age born to mothers aged 18-45 years will be recruited for this study.
  • Infants must have a family history of asthma, eczema, or hayfever in at least one first-degree relative and be in otherwise good overall health.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm birth defined as birth prior to 37 weeks gestation
  • Major congenital anomaly
  • Hydrops fetalis
  • Significant dermatitis at birth not including seborrheic dermatitis on the scalp ("cradle cap")
  • Any immunodeficiency disorder
  • Any severe genetic skin disorder
  • Any other serious condition that would make the use of emollients inadvisable
  • Any other major medical problems that the investigator deems may increase the risk of adverse events with the intervention or in whom assessing the outcomes may be masked by the underlying problem or practically very difficult to assess

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Subjects will apply Johnson&Johnson moisturizer to their infant's skin as often as they wish. They will also use the Johnson&Johnson cleanser.
Other: Standard of Care
Subjects will apply Johnson&Johnson moisturizer to their infant's skin as often as they wish. They will also use the Johnson&Johnson cleanser.
Other Names:
  • Johnson&Johnson
Experimental: Cetaphil Restoraderm
Subjects will apply Cetaphil Restoraderm moisturizer once daily to infant's skin. They will bathe their infant with Cetaphil Restoraderm cleanser.
Other: Cetaphil Restoraderm
Subjects will apply Cetaphil Restoraderm moisturizer once daily to infant's skin. They will bathe their infant with Cetaphil Restoraderm cleanser.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Atopic Dermatitis Diagnosed by Investigator at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of cumulative Atopic Dermatitis diagnosed by a blinded investigator at 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of High Emollient Use
Time Frame: 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Patient-reported adherence to the emollient regimen in the intervention group and the treatment group. High emollient use was defined as applying the intervention or control emollient five or more days per week.
2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Age at Onset of Eczema
Time Frame: Baseline through Month 24 Follow-up
Age of subject at onset of eczema
Baseline through Month 24 Follow-up
Filaggrin Mutation Status
Time Frame: 6 month visit
Filaggrin mutation status result
6 month visit
Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)
Time Frame: 2 month, 6 month, and 12 month visits
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) to measure skin barrier function
2 month, 6 month, and 12 month visits
Skin Hydration (Skin Electrical Capacitance)
Time Frame: 2 month, 6 month, and 12 month visits
Determination of stratum corneum hydration from the dorsal forearm
2 month, 6 month, and 12 month visits
Skin pH
Time Frame: 2 month, 6 month, and 12 month visits
Skin pH, as measured using a pH probe
2 month, 6 month, and 12 month visits

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oregon Health and Science University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Galderma R&D

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eric Simpson, MD, MCR, Oregon Health and Science University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Galderma Cetaphil Restoraderm

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings