Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma (NeoWTS)

June 23, 2011 updated by: Heidelberg University

A Phase II Study Evaluating Neo-/Adjuvant EIA Chemotherapy, Surgical Resection and Radiotherapy in High-risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Neo- and adjuvant chemotherapy is used in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma to improve systemic control. Patients in this trial are treated with 4 cycles of chemotherapy (EIA, etoposide, ifosfamide, adriamycin) preoperatively, followed by local surgery and radiotherapy. An additional 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy is administered. Treatment response is assessed by MRI and CT scans and FDG-PET in a subgroup of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50 - 60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy has been applied to achieve pre-operative cytoreduction, assess chemosensitivity and to eliminate occult metastasis. The current protocol comprises for cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ((EIA, etoposide 125 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 4, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 4, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc day 5), local surgery and radiotherapy as well as further 4 cycles of adjuvant EIA. Treatment response is assessed by MRI and CT scans and FDG-PET in a subgroup of patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Baden-Wuerttemberg
      • Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, 69120
        • Heidelberg University Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Soft tissue sarcoma histology
  • Tumor size >= 5 cm
  • Deep/extracompartimental localization
  • Grade 2/3 (FNCLCC)
  • Patients with inadequate previous therapy
  • Age 18-65 years
  • normal bone marrow function
  • normal liver function
  • normal renal function
  • Karnofsky index >=80%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chordoma
  • Chondrosarcoma
  • Kaposi´ sarcoma
  • Neuroblastoma
  • Mesothelioma
  • Osteosarcoma/Ewings´sarcoma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment Arm
All patients receive 4 cycles of EIA chemotherapy pre- and postoperatively. There is no further observation arm. The study is non-randomized.
Drug: EIA chemotherapy
ifosfamide 1500 mg/m² iv days 1 - 4, etoposide 125 mg/m² iv days 1 and 4, and adriamycin 50 mg/m² iv day 1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years after study completion
Disease-free survival will be calculated from the time of definite surgery to radiologically proven local or distant failure or patient´s death due to sarcoma related cause.
2 years after study completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 2 years after study completion
Overall survival will be calculated as the time interval from the date of therapy induction to patient's death or last follow up.
2 years after study completion
Grade of histological necrosis
Time Frame: After definite surgery, approx. 12-15 weeks after study inclusion
Grade of histological necrosis in tumor specimen will be assessed after surgery and graded according to Salzer-Kuntschik.
After definite surgery, approx. 12-15 weeks after study inclusion
Hematological toxicity
Time Frame: Once weekly for an average of 8 months
Hematological toxicity will be assessed by complete blood counts. Toxicity will be graded according to CTCAE.
Once weekly for an average of 8 months
Renal Toxicity
Time Frame: Once weekly for an average of 8 months
Renal toxicity will be assessed by changes from baseline creatinin levels. Toxicity will be graded according to CTCAE.
Once weekly for an average of 8 months
Liver Toxicity
Time Frame: Once weekly for an average of 8 months
Liver toxicity will be assessed by changes from baseline liver function tests, e.g. ASAT/ALAT. Toxicity will be graded according to CTCAE.
Once weekly for an average of 8 months
Correlation of Tumor Necrosis and Decline in PET SUV
Time Frame: After tumor resection, approx. 12-15 weeks after study inclusion
Decline in PET SUV will be correlated with grade of histological necrosis in tumor specimen after surgery.
After tumor resection, approx. 12-15 weeks after study inclusion
Cardiac Toxicity
Time Frame: Every 6 weeks for an average of 8 months
Changes in cardiac ejection fraction will be assessed by echocardiograms. Toxicities will be graded according to CTCAE.
Every 6 weeks for an average of 8 months
Radiologic Tumor Response
Time Frame: Every 6 weeks for an average of 8 months, then every 3 months for 2 years
Tumor response to therapy will be assessed by MRI and CT scans. Response will graded according to RECIST criteria.
Every 6 weeks for an average of 8 months, then every 3 months for 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Heidelberg University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
German Cancer Research Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gerlinde Egerer, MD, Department of Hematology, Heidelberg University Clinics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 27, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2004-002501-72 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings