Unipedicular vs. Bipedicular Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

June 3, 2017 updated by: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures has been shown to be successful in providing acute pain relief, enabling improved function, and restoring of vertebral body height. However, limited prospective data exists in the investigation of unipedicular balloon kyphoplasty as a sufficient alternative to bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of unipedicular and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
84

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 96 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females older than 50 years of age with acute vertebral compression fractures causing significant pain and functional limitations in their daily activities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • primary tumors of bone or evidence of metastasis at the index vertebrae
  • pre-existing chronic pain or functional disability unrelated to a vertebral compression fracture which would confound the data analysis
  • fracture secondary to a traumatic event
  • inability to fully visualize both pedicles of the fractured vertebrae on intraoperative fluoroscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Unipedicular kyphoplasty
Balloon kyphoplasty achieves reduction of the vertebral compression fracture using a balloon tamp inserted into the vertebral body by a transpedicular approach, followed by fixation of the fracture fragments with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. In this arm only vertebral body pedicle was entered to deliver bone cement.
Device: Kyphon® Balloon Kyphoplasty (Kyphon Inc; Sunnydale, CA)
A Jamshidi Crown Bone Biopsy Needle (Cardinal Health; Dublin, OH) was then introduced through the incision into the pedicle, and advanced through the pedicle into the center of the vertebral body using a mallet at a 30 to 45 degree angle relative to the AP axis. A guidewire was then placed through the Jamshidi needle, and the needle removed. A series of dilating cannulae were then advanced over the guidewire until a working cannula was in place. A 15 millimeter (mm) or 20 mm bone tamp (Kyphon Inc; Sunnydale, CA) was then introduced into the vertebral body via the cannula and inflated until the balloon was in contact with the subchondral plate, lateral vertebral body wall, or anterior cortex of the vertebral body. The balloon was then deflated and removed. Subsequently, cement was injected into the cavity and allowed to harden.
Active Comparator: Bipedicular Kyphoplasty group
Balloon kyphoplasty achieves reduction of the vertebral compression fracture using a balloon tamp inserted into the vertebral body by a transpedicular approach, followed by fixation of the fracture fragments with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. In this arm two pedicles were entered to deliver bone cement.
Device: Kyphon® Balloon Kyphoplasty (Kyphon Inc; Sunnydale, CA)
A Jamshidi Crown Bone Biopsy Needle (Cardinal Health; Dublin, OH) was then introduced through the incision into the pedicle, and advanced through the pedicle into the center of the vertebral body using a mallet at a 30 to 45 degree angle relative to the AP axis. A guidewire was then placed through the Jamshidi needle, and the needle removed. A series of dilating cannulae were then advanced over the guidewire until a working cannula was in place. A 15 millimeter (mm) or 20 mm bone tamp (Kyphon Inc; Sunnydale, CA) was then introduced into the vertebral body via the cannula and inflated until the balloon was in contact with the subchondral plate, lateral vertebral body wall, or anterior cortex of the vertebral body. The balloon was then deflated and removed. Subsequently, cement was injected into the cavity and allowed to harden.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of 3 Month ODI Score Between Unipedicular and Bipedicular Kyphoplasty Groups
Time Frame: Preoperative questionnaire within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative questionnaires at 3 months after surgery
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is an index derived from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain. The self-completed questionnaire contains ten topics. Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Preoperative questionnaire within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative questionnaires at 3 months after surgery
Change in RDQ in the Bipedicular Group From 3 to 12 Months
Time Frame: 3-12 months post operation
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is a widely used health status measure for low back pain. The RMDQ is scored by adding up the number of items checked by the patient. The score can therefore vary from 0 to 24. It is not recommended to give patients a 'Yes' / 'No' option. If patients indicate in any way that an item is not applicable to them, the item is scored 'No', i.e. the denominator remains 24. A score of 0 indicates no low back pain, while a score of 24 indicates significant low back pain.
3-12 months post operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anterior Vertebral Body Height Restoration Following Surgery With Kyphoplasty
Time Frame: Preoperative assessment within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative day 1
Preoperative and postoperative thoracolumbar radiographs were used to calculate the percent changes of the anterior vertebral body heights.
Preoperative assessment within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative day 1
Measurement of Change in Kyphotic (Cobb) Angle Following Kyphoplasty
Time Frame: Preoperative assessment within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative day 1
Preoperative and postoperative thoracolumbar radiographs used to calculate the change in kyphotic (Cobb) angle of the spine following surgery
Preoperative assessment within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative day 1
Comparison of 3 Month RDQ Score Between Unipedicular and Bipedicular Kyphoplasty Groups
Time Frame: 3 months post-op
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is a widely used health status measure for low back pain. The RMDQ is scored by adding up the number of items checked by the patient. The score can therefore vary from 0 to 24. It is not recommended to give patients a 'Yes' / 'No' option. If patients indicate in any way that an item is not applicable to them, the item is scored 'No', i.e. the denominator remains 24. A score of 0 indicates no low back pain, while a score of 24 indicates significant low back pain.
3 months post-op
Comparison of 3 Month VAS Score Between Unipedicular and Bipedicular Kyphoplasty Groups
Time Frame: 3 months post-op
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured.[1] It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. The scale is from 1-10 with 10 as the highest level of pain, and 0 being no pain
3 months post-op
Comparison of 12 Month ODI Score Between Unipedicular and Bipedicular Kyphoplasty Groups
Time Frame: 12 months post-op
Each topic category is followed by 6 statements describing different potential scenarios in the patient's life relating to the topic. The patient then checks the statement which most closely resembles their situation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 with the first statement being zero and indicating the least amount of disability and the last statement is scored 5 indicating most severe disability.[2] The scores for all questions answered are summed. Zero is equated with no disability and 50 is the maximum disability possible
12 months post-op
Comparison of 12 Month RDQ Score Between Unipedicular and Bipedicular Kyphoplasty Groups
Time Frame: 12 months post-op
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is a widely used health status measure for low back pain. The RMDQ is scored by adding up the number of items checked by the patient. The score can therefore vary from 0 to 24. It is not recommended to give patients a 'Yes' / 'No' option. If patients indicate in any way that an item is not applicable to them, the item is scored 'No', i.e. the denominator remains 24. A score of 0 indicates no back pain, while a score of 24 indicates significant back pain.
12 months post-op
Comparison of 12 Month VAS Score Between Unipedicular and Bipedicular Kyphoplasty Groups
Time Frame: 12 months post-op
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured.[1] It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. The scale is from 1-10 with 10 as the highest level of pain, and 0 being no pain
12 months post-op
Middle Vertebral Body Height Restoration Following Surgery With Kyphoplasty
Time Frame: Preoperative assessment within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative day 1
Preoperative and postoperative thoracolumbar radiographs were used to calculate the percent changes of the middle vertebral body heights.
Preoperative assessment within 3 weeks before surgery and postoperative day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Tzipora Kuba, PhD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph M Lane, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 26033

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings