Pharmacokinetic Effects of QTI571 on Sildenafil and Bosentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Participants

June 17, 2021 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Non-Randomized, Multiple Dose, Three Treatment Period, Open-Label, Single Sequence, Single Group Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Effect of Two Doses of QTI571 (Imatinib) on the Co-administered Drugs Sildenafil and Bosentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Patients

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of QTI571 (imatinib) on pharmacokinetics of bosentan and sildenafil at steady state when co-administered to participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Belgium
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1070
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 12683
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Italy
    • RM
      • Roma, RM, Italy, 00161
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Lithuania
      • Vilnius, Lithuania, LT-08661
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2PR
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • United States
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Weston, Florida, United States, 33331
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New York
      • Mineola, New York, United States, 11501
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in World Health Organization (WHO) Diagnostic Group 1, with pulmonary vascular resistance > 800 dyne*sec*cm^-5,
  • On stable doses of bosentan and sildenafil

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other diagnosis of PAH in World Health Organization (WHO) Diagnostic Group 1 such as congenital large or small unrepaired systemic to pulmonary shunts, portal hypertension, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection, glycogen storage disease, Gaucher's disease, hereditary hemorrhagic teleangiectasia, hemoglobinopathies, myeloproliferative disorders, veno-occlusive pulmonary disease
  • Significant lung diseases not related to PAH
  • Significant cardiovascular system disorders, hematological system disorders, liver insufficiency
  • Significant diseases in other organ system.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Imatinib + Bosentan + Sildenafil
Participants received treatment with bosentan 125 milligrams (mg) twice daily and sildenafil thrice daily for 8 days in treatment period 1. Participants were on the same sildenafil dose level (20, 40, 50 or 60 mg) they had been at study entry which was well tolerated in conjunction with bosentan. Following treatment period 1, the participants received concomitant treatment of oral imatinib 200 mg daily, bosentan 125 mg twice daily and sildenafil thrice daily for 14 days in treatment period 2. Following treatment period 2, the participants received concomitant treatment of oral imatinib 400 mg daily, bosentan 125 mg twice daily and sildenafil thrice daily for 14 days in treatment period 3.
Drug: Imatinib
Film coated tablets, oral administration
Other Names:
  • QTI571
Drug: Sildenafil
Oral Administration
Drug: Bosentan
Oral Administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Tau (AUCtau) for Bosentan Before and After Imatinib Administrations
Time Frame: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
AUCtau was the area under the curve calculated to the end of the dosing interval, tau. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan was performed on dose normalized AUCtau of bosentan. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals were then "back-transformed" to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference).
Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized AUCtau for Sildenafil Before and After Imatinib Administrations
Time Frame: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
AUCtau was the area under the curve calculated to the end of the dosing interval, tau. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil was performed on dose normalized AUCtau of sildenafil. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals were then "back-transformed" to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference).
Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Bosentan Before and After Imatinib Administrations
Time Frame: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Cmax was the maximum (peak) observed plasma, blood, serum, or other body fluid drug concentration after dose administration. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan was performed on dose normalized Cmax of bosentan. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals were then "back-transformed" to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference).
Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Cmax for Sildenafil Before and After Imatinib Administrations
Time Frame: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Cmax was the maximum (peak) observed plasma, blood, serum, or other body fluid drug concentration after dose administration. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil was performed on dose normalized Cmax of sildenafil. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals was then "back-transformed" to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference).
Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With At Least One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From time of first administration of study drug until end of study (up to approximately 18 months)
An adverse event was the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition that occurred after starting the study drug even if the event was not considered to be related to study drug. Number of participants with AEs were reported by treatment period.
From time of first administration of study drug until end of study (up to approximately 18 months)
Dose Normalized Cmax of Imatinib and CGP74588 (Active Metabolite of Imatinib)
Time Frame: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Dose Normalized AUCtau of Imatinib and CGP74588 (Active Metabolite of Imatinib)
Time Frame: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose
Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 20, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 25, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 25, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CQTI571A2102
  • 2010-021344-17 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings