Intravenous AII for the Treatment of Severe Hypotension in High Output Shock: A Pilot Study (ATHOS)

October 20, 2023 updated by: George Washington University
The investigators propose a dose finding study to determine the feasibility of Angiotensin II (AII) to increase mean arterial pressure in high-output shock. If AII can be shown to increase mean arterial pressure, this could lead to future pharmacologic development based on the AII hormonal pathway. The investigators propose a 20 patient, randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study in the treatment of high-output shock. Patients with high-output shock and a cardiovascular SOFA (sequential organ failure score) score of > 4 will be eligible. In addition, patients must already be receiving cardiac output monitoring and have a cardiac index > 2.4 L/min/ 1.73 m2. Patients will be randomized to intravenous AII or saline in a blinded fashion. There will be 10 patients in each arm. This is a safety and dose finding feasibility study. The investigators are starting with a small cohort consistent with similar types of studies. The investigators estimate that ten patients in each arm will generate a basis for determining if there is sufficient signal for AII to improve blood pressure at the doses outlined. The primary endpoint in the study will be the effect of AII on the standing dose of norepinephrine which is required to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg. Secondary endpoints will be the effect of AII on urine output, serum lactate, and creatinine clearance. 30 day post dose mortality will also be assessed. Subjects discharged prior to day 30 will be contacted by telephone for this assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • GW University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. High-output shock
  2. Cardiovascular SOFA score of > 4
  3. Cardiac Index > 2.4 liters/min/BSA 1.73m2
  4. Indwelling arterial line already present as part of standard care
  5. Age > 21 years of age
  6. Signed consent form
  7. Use of indwelling urinary catheter as standard care expected at least for 12 hours during the study interventions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with acute coronary syndrome
  2. Patients with a known history of vasospasm
  3. Patients with a history of asthma
  4. Patients currently experiencing bronchospasm
  5. Patients with active bleeding with an anticipated need for > 4 units of PRBC or Hemoglobin < 7g/dL or any other condition that would contraindicate drawing serial blood samples

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Control
Control patients will receive placebo intravenously equal in duration, color and volume to the intervention arm's angiotensin II.
Drug: Angiotensin II
All patients will have their vasopressors titrated to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm of Hg (standard MAP goal in the ICU for patients suffering from shock). Patients will then be randomized to control or IV AII. In the interventional arm, AII will start at a dose of 20ng/kg/min; the dose can then be titrated up to 30ng/kg/min, and then to 40ng/kg/min. The intervention will last for 6 hours. Each patient will start with the assigned starting dose indicated above. After the first hour, if the patient is still requiring standing norepinephrine (the standard vasopressor for the treatment of shock in the GW ICU), the dose of the control/interventional drug can be increased 50%. After the second hour, if the patient is still requiring a standing dose of norepinephrine, the control/interventional can be increased again to twice the initial dose. At the end of 6 hours, the study drug will be titrated off.
Active Comparator: Angiotensin
The angiotensin arm will receive angiotensin II acetate at an initial dose of 20ng/kg/min, titratable during the study (6 hours) for mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals as outlined in the protocol.
Drug: Angiotensin II
All patients will have their vasopressors titrated to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm of Hg (standard MAP goal in the ICU for patients suffering from shock). Patients will then be randomized to control or IV AII. In the interventional arm, AII will start at a dose of 20ng/kg/min; the dose can then be titrated up to 30ng/kg/min, and then to 40ng/kg/min. The intervention will last for 6 hours. Each patient will start with the assigned starting dose indicated above. After the first hour, if the patient is still requiring standing norepinephrine (the standard vasopressor for the treatment of shock in the GW ICU), the dose of the control/interventional drug can be increased 50%. After the second hour, if the patient is still requiring a standing dose of norepinephrine, the control/interventional can be increased again to twice the initial dose. At the end of 6 hours, the study drug will be titrated off.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standing Dose of Norepinephrine Which is Required to Maintain a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg - Hour 1
Time Frame: 1 hour after initiation of angiotensin II (ATII)
The primary endpoint in the study will be the effect of AII on the standing dose of norepinephrine which is required to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg.
1 hour after initiation of angiotensin II (ATII)
Standing Dose of Norepinephrine Which is Required to Maintain a MAP of 65 mmHg - Hour 2
Time Frame: 2 hours after initiation of ATII
The primary endpoint in the study will be the effect of AII on the standing dose of norepinephrine which is required to maintain a MAP of 65 mmHg.
2 hours after initiation of ATII

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 day post dose mortality will be assessed. Subjects discharged prior to day 30 will be contacted by telephone for this assessment.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
George Washington University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lakhmir Chawla, MD, GW University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 13, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 111016

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings