Anticipative Diagnosis of Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream Infections

May 2, 2016 updated by: Robert Krause, MD, Medical University of Graz

Anticipative Diagnosis of Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream Infections Using Biphasic PNA FISH and Gram Stain/AOLC Tests

Up to date methods for diagnosis of Catheter Related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSI) are performed only when CRBSI is clinically suspected. Thus, patients may actually suffer from CRBSI and are at risk to concurrently suffer from or develop complications like endocarditis or septic embolism when diagnostic procedures for the detection of CRBSI are introduced. The aim of the project is to investigate a more sensitive and specific test for anticipative diagnosis of CRBSI using biphasic PNA FISH test compared to Gram stain/AOLC test.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Management of patients with hematologic malignancies, renal failure or diseases requiring intensive care often necessitates the use of central venous catheters (CVC). Beside obvious advantages CVCs bear a great risk for local or systemic infections. In the US estimated 250 000 catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSIs) occur each year with mortality rates of 12-25%. Diagnosis of CRBSIs remains challenging as systemic clinical signs are unspecific and local signs of infection are often absent. Conventional methods for diagnosing CRBSIs require removal of the CVC. However, only 15% of CVCs removed in patients with clinical suspicion of CRBSI prove to be infected. It has been shown that CRBSI can also be detected by the differential time to positivity (DTP) method without catheter removal. The Gram stain/acridine-orange leukocyte cytospin (AOLC) test and PNA FISH test are another methods for the diagnosis of CRBSI that does not require the removal of the CVC and additionally have shown to be fast. Up to date methods for diagnosis of CRBSI are performed only when CRBSI is clinically suspected. Thus, patients may actually suffer from CRBSI and are at risk to concurrently suffer from or develop complications like endocarditis or septic embolism when diagnostic procedures for the detection of CRBSI are introduced. Since CRBSIs are not entirely preventable by strict hygiene measures earlier diagnosis of CRBSI in subclinical stages is desirable to avoid CRBSI-associated morbidity and mortality. Previously a pilot study showed that Gram stain/AOLC screening of CVCs in neutropenic patients was a useful test to predict the development of CRBSI on average 48 hours before the diagnosis was established by routine measures. In the pilot study Gram stain/AOLC screening test exhibited high specificity whereas sensitivity was moderate. PNA FISH is a specific slide-based staining technique that provides pathogen identification from blood samples containing a given amount of bacteria or fungi within a 1,5 hours. PNA FISH test has a slightly lower detection limit compared to Gram stain/AOLC which might therefore result in higher sensitivity when used as a screening tool. The aim of the project is to investigate a more sensitive and specific test for anticipative diagnosis of CRBSI using biphasic PNA FISH test compared to Gram stain/AOLC test.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
    • Stmk
      • Graz, Stmk, Austria, 8036
        • Medical University of Graz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing hemodialysis using a central venous catheter and Patients with underlying hematooncologic disease with central venous catheters

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing hemodialysis using a central venous catheter and
  • Patients with underlying hematooncologic disease with central venous catheters

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No central venous catheter
  • Current CRBSI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Group dialysis patients
Patient on hemodialysis with central venous catheter
Group hematology patients
Patients with hemato-oncologic underlying disease (plus/minus hematopoietic stem cell transplantation HSCT) and central venous catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
development of crbsi
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the development of CRBSI during the duration of central venous catheter usage, an expected average of 1 year in hemodialysis patients and an expected average of six weeks in HSCT patients.
There is only one outcome measure that is evaluated in two patient cohorts. Screening of catheter blood for microbial burden is performed during the whole study. Outcome measure is the development of CRBSI in these screened patients. Patients on hemodialysis using a CVC will be screened and observed for an sheduled time of approx. 1,5 years or until the CVC will be removed and hemodialysis no longer necessary. Patients undergoing HSCT will be screened and observed until CVC will be removed.
Participants will be followed for the development of CRBSI during the duration of central venous catheter usage, an expected average of 1 year in hemodialysis patients and an expected average of six weeks in HSCT patients.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of Graz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CRBSI FFG Bridge

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings