Evaluation of Marketed Contact Lens Disinfectant Systems on Eyelid Tissues
Evaluation of the Effects of Clear Care/AOSEPT Plus Hydrogen Peroxide Solution on the Eyelid Tissues - Part II: Comparative Evaluation With RENU MPS Over 3 Months of Wear
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Read and understand Participant Information Sheet;
- Read, sign, and date Informed Consent;
- Successfully wearing silicone hydrogel contact lenses under a frequent replacement (biweekly or monthly) daily wear modality;
- Using a PHMB-containing multipurpose contact lens solution;
- Symptomatic, as specified in protocol;
- Best corrected visual acuity of 6/9 or better in each eye;
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any known sensitivity or intolerance to the contact lenses or len care products to be used;
- Systemic disease/medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or produce dry eye side effects;
- Ocular allergies or ocular disease which might interfere with contact lens wear;
- Use of any concomitant topical ocular medications during the study period;
- Participation in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days of entering the study;
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus
Hydrogen peroxide-based contact lens care system used per manufacturer's instructions
|
Other Names:
Contact lenses identical to habitual prescription worn per usual replacement regimen
|
|
Active Comparator: ReNu MultiPlus
PHMB-containing contact lens solution used per manufacturer's instructions
|
Contact lenses identical to habitual prescription worn per usual replacement regimen
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Papillae
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
Eyelid papillae (bumps on the inner eyelid) were recorded separately for three zones of the upper lid and overall for the lower lid on a 5-point forced choice scale (0 = None; 1 = Slight (diffuse papillae); 2 = Mild (diffuse & tufts papillae); 3 = Moderate (moderate & tufts papillae); 4 = Severe (giant papillae).
The maximum value represents the worse grade in any zone.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Maximum Eyelid Hyperaemia
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
Eyelid hyperaemia (redness) was recorded separately for three zones of the upper lid and overall for the lower lid on a 5-point forced choice scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Slight redness; 2 = Mild redness; 3 = Moderate redness; 4 = Severe redness).
The maximum value represents the worst grade in any zone.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Upper Lid Redness
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
The contact lenses were removed and upper lid redness was objectively measured through digital images.
The coverage of the palpebral surface by blood vessels is expressed as percentage of the total surface measured.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Change From Baseline in Upper Eyelid Margin Staining at Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
The contact lens was removed and ophthalmic dye was instilled.
Upper eyelid margin staining was objectively measured through digital images.
The extent of true staining (i.e., the total area of lid margin covered by staining) was recorded.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Median Non-Invasive Pre-Lens Tear Film Break Up Time (PL-NIBUT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
The pre-lens tear film is the layer of tears located on top of the contact lens (i.e., between the eyelid and the contact lens).
The time required for a dry spot to appear on the pre-lens surface after blinking is referred to as the pre-lens tear film break up time.
PL-NIBUT was evaluated using a biomicroscope with a diffuse illumination source, i.e., Tearscope.
A longer PL-NIBUT indicates a more stable tear film and greater on-eye lens wettability.
Three PL-NIBUT measurements were recorded, and the median value was used for analysis.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Protective Index
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
A digital video recording was made of the interblink period.
The percentage of area of the visible contact lens covered by the tear film was calculated (Protected Area).
The Protective Index is defined as the average tear coverage over the whole interblink period.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Median Front Lens Deposits
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
Deposits present on the front surface of the lens were assessed with a biomicroscope while the lens was on eye.
Deposits were rated on a 5-point forced choice scale (0 = none; 1 = slight; = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) in five lens zones.
The median of the five zones was used for analysis.
Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Total Lipid Uptake Per Lens
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
The contact lens was aseptically removed from the eye.
Lipids were extracted and analyzed using a proprietary High Performance Liquid Chromatography technique.
A lower value would indicate a cleaner lens surface.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michel Guillon, PhD, FCOptom, FAAO, CCTI, OTG Research & Consultancy
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ID 10-59 / M-11-02
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.