Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Postexposure Prophylaxis (PEP) With Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) (PEPDar)

June 21, 2017 updated by: Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis With Darunavir/r (PEPDar)

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the rate of early discontinuation from randomized Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Postexposure Prophylaxis (PEP) for any reason other than confirmation of the negative HIV infection status of the index person in patients receiving HIV PEP for at least 28 and a maximum of 30 days.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (study medication assigned by chance), open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention), active-controlled (patients are assigned to either a recognized effective treatment or the study medication), parallel-group (each treatment group will be treated at the same time), multicenter study comparing DRV/r PEP (DRV/r administered with 2 NRTIs selected at the discretion of the investigator) to standard of care PEP (as per German-Austrian guidelines) in patients at risk of HIV infection due to HIV exposure through occupational injury and non-occupational exposure. This study consists of screening period, treatment period and a follow up period. HIV PEP will be administered for a total of at least 28 days and maximum of 30 days during treatment period, including any prestudy HIV PEP initiated before screening. Approximately 318 patients will be screened and enrolled to ensure that at least 131 patients are randomly assigned to receive DRV/r PEP or standard of care PEP. Safety will be evaluated during the entire study period. Data relating to a patient's functional impairment in conjunction with HIV PEP will be collected on Day 1 as baseline data, and further on Days 14 and 28 as well as at Month 3.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
312

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Bonn, Germany
      • Dortmund, Germany
      • Dresden, Germany
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
      • Erlangen, Germany
      • Frankfurt, Germany
      • Freiburg, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Köln, Germany
      • Magdeburg, Germany
      • Mainz, Germany
      • Mannheim, Germany
      • München, Germany
      • Regensburg, Germany
      • Stuttgart, Germany
      • Ulm, Germany

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Occupational injury and non-occupational exposure with documented human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exposure, or potential for HIV exposure
  • Indication for HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), as determined by the treating physician and/or the investigator
  • Women must be: postmenopausal (for at least 2 years), surgically sterile, using oral contraceptives
  • Willing to continue HIV PEP for 28 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive HIV rapid test
  • History of liver or renal insufficiency; significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastro intestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the well-being of the participant or the study or prevent the participant from meeting or performing study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: DRV/r with 2 NRTIs
DRV/r 800/100 mg q.d. with 2 NRTIs: darunavir (800 mg) in combination with low-dose ritonavir (100 mg) administered once a day for at least 28 days and a maximum of 30 days along with 2 nucleoside/nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).
Drug: Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r)
Darunavir (DRV) type=exact number, unit=mg, number=800, form=tablet, route=oral use. Tablet is taken once a day, for 28 days; Ritonavir (r) type=exact number, unit=mg, number=100, form=tablet, route=oral use. Tablet is taken once a day, for at least 28 days and a maximum of 30 days.
Drug: NRTIs
The NRTIs (including tenofovir/emtricitabine [Truvada], lamivudine/zidovudine [Combivir]) will be administered as per the individual Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) at the discretion of either the treating physician or Investigator.
Active Comparator: Comparator standard of care HIV PEP
Comparator standard of care HIV PEP (as per German-Austrian Guidelines): Administration of the standard of care HIV PEP (postexposure prophylaxis) consisting of 2 NRTIs plus third partner.
Drug: NRTIs
The NRTIs (including tenofovir/emtricitabine [Truvada], lamivudine/zidovudine [Combivir]) will be administered as per the individual Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) at the discretion of either the treating physician or Investigator.
Drug: Lopinavir in fixed combination with Ritonavir
type=exact number, unit=mg, number=400/100, form=tablet, route=oral use. Tablet is taken once or twice a day, for at least 28 days and a maximum of 30 days.
Other Names:
  • Kaletra
Drug: Zidovudine
type=exact number, unit=mg, number=250, form=tablet, route=oral use. Tablet is taken twice a day, for at least 28 days and a maximum of 30 days.
Other Names:
  • Retrovir
Drug: Efavirenz
type=exact number, unit=mg, number=600, form=tablet, route=oral use. Tablet is taken once a day, for at least 28 days and a maximum of 30 days.
Other Names:
  • Sustiva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Early Discontinuation From Randomized Human Immunodeficiency Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis (HIV PEP)
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Number of participants with early discontinuation from randomized HIV PEP for any reason other than confirmation of the negative HIV infection status of the index person in participants receiving HIV PEP for at least 28 days and a maximum of 30 days was assessed. Per protocol (PP) population included all participants in modified intention-to-treat (mITT [defined as all participants who were assigned to receive randomized HIV PEP and were not discontinued due to confirmation of the negative HIV infection status of the index person]) excluding participants with: No indication for HIV PEP; Initiation of PEP >72 hours after injury; Discontinuation of HIV PEP due to confirmation of HIV negative status of index person and if index person bears resistant virus against HIV PEP components prescribed; incorrect HIV PEP; no intake of medication.
Up to 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Month 3
An adverse event (AE) is defined to be non-treatment-emergent if the onset date of the AE was clearly before the date of first HIV PEP administration, otherwise it is considered treatment-emergent.
Up to Month 3
Worst Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Score for the Safety Population
Time Frame: Month 3
The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) assesses functional impairment in 3 inter-related domains: work/school, social and family life, using a rating scale for each item ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely).
Month 3
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Detectable HIV Antibodies
Time Frame: At Month 3
Seroconversion rate of HIV antibodies while receiving HIV PEP evaluated as the percentage of participants who developed detectable HIV antibodies (defined as positive) and percentage of participants who had not developed detectable HIV antibodies (defined as negative). Per protocol (PP) population included all participants in mITT (defined as all participants who were assigned to receive randomized HIV PEP and were not discontinued due to confirmation of the negative HIV infection status of the index person) excluding participants with: No indication for HIV PEP; Initiation of PEP >72 hours after injury; Discontinuation of HIV PEP due to confirmation of HIV negative status of index person and if index person bears resistant virus against HIV PEP components prescribed; incorrect HIV PEP; no intake of medication.
At Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 25, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 28, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR018349
  • TMC114IFD3004 (Other Identifier: Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H, Germany)
  • 2011-001303-13 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings