Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Using Nonintubated Anesthesia Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Lung Cancer Patients

October 27, 2013 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Safety and Results of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Using Nonintubated Anesthesia Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Lung Cancer Patients.

The purpose of this study is to study the safety and results of thoracoscopic lobectomy using non-intubated thoracic epidural anesthesia versus intubated general anesthesia for lung cancer patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Taiwan. Traditionally, open thoracotomy has been the standard approach for lung cancer surgery, including lobectomy and pneumonectomy. With the advance of thoracoscopic technique, thoracoscopic lobectomy has emerged as a reasonable option for the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and is supported by evidence-based treatment guidelines. Advantages of thoracoscopic lobectomy compared with thoracotomy include less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, and decreased postoperative pulmonary complications.

Traditionally, general anesthesia (GA) with one-lung ventilation using double-lumen endotracheal intubation has been considered mandatory in both open and thoracoscopic surgery. However, adverse effects of GA may occur after the operation, including ventilator-induced lung injury, impaired cardiac performance, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and residual neuromuscular blockade.

In order to reduce the adverse effects of GA, nonintubated anesthesia has been recently employed to perform thoracic surgery procedures including coronary artery bypass, management of pneumothorax, resection of pulmonary nodules and solitary metastases, lung volume reduction (LVR), and even transsternal thymectomy. The results achieved in these early series have been encouraging. In Taiwan, nonintubated thoracic surgery has also been performed at Taipei Veteran General Hospital in a high risk patient with satisfactory results.

The role of nonintubated anesthesia in thoracoscopic lobectomy is rarely investigated. There is a report showed that lobectomy using nonintubated anesthesia is safe and feasible, although only 3 cases were reported [13]. In our hospital, we also performed 6 thoracoscopic lobectomy using nonintubated anesthesia between August and October, 2009 with satisfactory results. Until now, the safety and effects of nonintubated anesthesia in thoracoscopic lobectomy has been unclear and comparison between nonintubated and intubated general anesthesia has never been reported. We hypothesize that nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy will be associated with a comparable oncological results, lower cardiopulmonary complications, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays. To this end, we will compare safety and results of thoracoscopic lobectomy using nonintubated anesthesia versus intubated general anesthesia for lung cancer patients.

This study will be performed at National Taiwan University Hospital. A total of 100 patients will be included (50 patients in each arm).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jin-Shing Chen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ya-Jung Cheng, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-small cell lung cancer with clinical staging of I or II for whom thoracoscopic lobectomy is feasible.
  2. Age between 25 and 80 years old
  3. Tumor size < 5 cm without chest wall, diaphragm, or main bronchus invasion
  4. Predicted FEV 1.0 > 60% or FEV1.0 > 1.5L

  5. Organ Function Requirements:

    • Adequate hematological function (ANC > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L)
    • PT, PTT<1.5X
  6. Written inform consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Failed thoracic epidural catheter insertion
  2. A history of previous epidural catheter insertion or ipsilateral thoracic operation
  3. Signs of intrapleural adhesions
  4. Pregnant or lactation female
  5. ASA score greater than 3
  6. Unfavorable airway or spinal anatomy judged by anesthesiologist
  7. Sleep apnea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: nonintubated anesthesia
Thoracoscopic lobectomy using nonintubated anesthesia
Procedure: thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection
Other Names:
  • VATS lobectomy
Active Comparator: intubated general anesthesia
Thoracoscopic lobectomy using intubated general anesthesia
Procedure: thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection
Other Names:
  • VATS lobectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the safety after intervention of each group.
Time Frame: 1 month
Comparing the complication and morbidity after intervention of each group
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-term outcome
Time Frame: one month
including ICU stay, period of ventilator use, hospital stay, number of days with chest drainage, adverse events, etc.
one month
Oncological outcome
Time Frame: 5 years
Number of LN dissection and overall survival after the operation
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Jin-Shing Chen, MD, PhD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 29, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 27, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 200911022R

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings