A Five-Year Quality of Life Study for Cancer Patients (IPTLD)

May 1, 2013 updated by: Constantine A. Kotsanis

A Quality of Life Study Using Insulin Potentiation Targeted LowDose (IPTLDSM ) Chemotherapy and Nutrition Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer - The IPTLDSM QoL Broad Study

The investigator is looking for patients who have been diagnosed with stage 1-4 cancer to enroll in a five year Quality of Life clinical trial study in which the participant has previously elected to use Insulin Potentiation Targeted Low Dose (IPTLD) as a means to treat their illness. This study is a quality of life study and not a treatment study. Participants participating in the study will be asked to complete quality of life questionnaires. The questionnaires completed by the patients will measure mood, energy level, ability to function, level of pain, and other measures that indicate how a patient feels about the quality of their daily living.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Patients will complete surveys once per month during their participation in the quality of life study, and then a series of follow-up surveys: every two months the second year; every three (3) months the third year and every six months the fourth and fifth year.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Grapevine, Texas, United States, 76051
        • Recruiting
        • The Kotsanis Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be from patients who have been diagnosed with stage 1-4 cancer that have chosen to use IPTLD and nutritional therapy and have been referred by a physician, word of mouth or through internet website inquiries.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Only patients in active treatment with IPTLD are eligible i.e. patients have consented to treatment with IPTLD.
  • Women who are pregnant, or could become pregnant, may not participate in the study.
  • Patients 18 years of age or older
  • Patients have to be able and willing to complete the various QoL instruments, which will be given upon enrollment and at designated follow-up intervals.
  • Patients must have either had the benefits of standard, appropriate therapy and have had that fail, or refuse to receive these therapies after having been informed of the standard of care for their particular stage and diagnosis. This criteria is included for ethical, not clinical reasons.
  • In addition, other criteria may be developed that more specifically address: The type, stage, location of the cancer/metastasis. The length of time since diagnosis. Previous treatments attempted and their outcome, Length of time since last treatment and concurrent conventional treatments. Nutritional approaches, other cam treatments, factors that may confound the study results.
  • Ability, commitment of patient to follow IPTLD protocol
  • Best Answer for Cancer Foundation and Kotsanis Institute do intend to draw subjects only from within the pool of patients who have elected to undergo IPTLD and nutrition therapy as their treatment of choice; limiting the universe of subjects to IPTLD patients removes the confounding effects of patient treatment choice and possible consideration of other treatment arms from the design.
  • The focus is simple: it is to follow IPTLD patients and determine longitudinal impacts of treatment on quality of life experienced by IPTLD patients as a treatment group.
  • It is to allow comparison with well-documented QoL results from conventional chemotherapy. This is the original intent, and recruitment efforts for participants will remain within those who are IPTLD patients.
  • The initial, baseline QoL testing of IPTLD patients who choose to be in the study will include some questions designed to elicit the reasons the patient decided on IPTLD and nutrition therapy. Documenting these choices can serve two purposes; correlations between reasons, and the attitudes they reveal about factors known to impact QoL, such a positive sense of controlling one's health choices, can be drawn. Further, once these factors are accounted for, some inferences about the extent to which IPTLD and nutrition therapy are responsible for impacts on QoL can be derived.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The Medical Director/Principal Investigator will consider excluding specific cancers, for ethical reasons, that are intractable and known to have a rapid course, or which are known to be unresponsive to IPTLD.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Study
Time Frame: yearly
MDASI Survey, FACIT
yearly

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Constantine A. Kotsanis

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Best Answer for Cancer Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Constantine A. Kotsanis, MD, The Kotsanis Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 3, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 1, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10.03.0010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings