Peanut Allergy Oral Immunotherapy Desensitization

January 18, 2022 updated by: Dr. Susan Waserman, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

The purpose of the study is to determine how a type of treatment for peanut allergy known as oral desensitization works in the immune system.

Objectives

  1. To determine whether premedication with desloratidine and ranitidine results in fewer side effects during desensitization procedure.
  2. To assess quality of life in peanut allergic subjects before and after desensitization.
  3. To compare serum metabolites in peanut allergic and non peanut allergic subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Allergic reactions to peanuts and tree nuts account for the majority of fatal and near fatal food allergic reactions, and the only treatment is complete avoidance of peanut. Despite avoidance, the majority of peanut allergic people will accidently ingest peanut. OIT has been shown to desensitize peanut allergic subjects (Hofmann et al. 2009). This would protect patients who have no other treatment, and may even form the basis for true tolerance to peanut in the future.

Objectives:

  1. To determine whether premedication with desloratidine and ranitidine results in fewer side effects during desensitization procedure.
  2. To assess quality of life in peanut allergic subjects before and after desensitization.
  3. To compare serum metabolites in peanut allergic and non peanut allergic subjects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • McMaster University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be between 5 and 10 years of age.
  • Patients will be confirmed to have peanut allergy based on a history of significant clinical symptoms within 60 minutes after the ingestion of peanut,the presence of specific IgE to peanut (a positive skin prick test to peanut, defined as a wheal 3 mm larger than that of the saline control; and a positive in vitro IgE [CAP-FEIA] result of >15 kU/L..
  • Patients will also be accepted into the study if they have a clinical reaction to peanut ingestion within the past 6 months, a positive skin prick test to peanut as defined previously, and an in vitro peanut IgE (CAP-FEIA) result of 7 kU/L or greater.
  • Subjects must be free of any clinically significant disease which may interfere with study evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of antihistamines or decongestant therapy 7 days prior to the clinic visit. (antihistamines eg. diphenhydramine, desloratadine etc or throughout the desensitization phase of the study.
  • Patients who had an acute allergic reaction to food other than peanut, drugs, or stinging insects one month prior to the recruitment clinic visit
  • Patients who have had a respiratory infection one month prior to the recruitment clinic visit.
  • Patients with significant or uncontrolled asthma, (inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone >500 mcg per day, ciclesonide >400 mcg per day or budesonide >800 mcg per day or the corresponding combination inhalers, oral prednisone in the preceding 1 month and FEV1 < 80% predicted). Nasal steroids, bronchodilators and leukotriene inhibitors will be permitted. If Prednisone is taken, it must also be stopped 1 month prior to blood being drawn if possible.
  • Patients who received allergy injections (immunotherapy) to environmental allergens at any time in the past. Symptomatic atopic dermatitis or chronic urticaria which may interfere with ability to evaluate oral immunotherapy and /or requiring daily medication including antihistamines.
  • Patients with problems related to compliance or following study instructions. Inability to come to hospital every 2 weeks for dose escalation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Oral Immunotherapy with placebo antihistamines
500 mg Peanut Protein with placebo antihistamines
Procedure: Peanut protein
500 mg
Other Names:
  • Old Birginia Byrd Mill 12% Lightly Roasted Peanut Flour
Placebo Comparator: Double Placebo
Placebo (Oat flour) and placebo antihistamines
Procedure: Oat flour
500 mg Oat flour
Active Comparator: Oral Immunotherapy with H1 and H2 antihistamines
500 mg Peanut Protein with Dosage of desloratidine 5 ml po od (0.5mg/ml = 2.5 mg) and ranitidine be 5ml (15mg/ml=75 mg) po bid.
Procedure: Peanut protein
500 mg
Other Names:
  • Old Birginia Byrd Mill 12% Lightly Roasted Peanut Flour
Drug: Antihistamine
Desloratidine 5 ml po od (0.5mg/ml = 2.5 mg) Ranitidine 5ml (15mg/ml=75 mg) po bid
Other Names:
  • Desloratadine and Ranitidine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Frequency and risk of adverse events, overall and stratified by organ system and severity
6-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life pre and post intervention
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Pre and post OIT.
6-12 months
Eliciting doses to oral food challenge
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Patients will be challenged at the end of the treatment period with peanut at the end to determine the change from threshold that they are able to tolerate.
6-12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunological changes/Mechanistic outcomes
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Various mechanistic outcomes/biomarkers
6-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
McMaster University
AllerGen NCE Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Waserman, MD, McMaster University
  • Principal Investigator: Susan Waserman, ME, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REB 07-348

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peanut Allergy

Clinical Trials on Peanut protein

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings