Three-dimensional Craniofacial Phenotyping of Patients With Difficult Airway

December 14, 2015 updated by: Jacek Wojtczak, University of Rochester

Three -Dimensional (3-D) Craniofacial Phenotyping of Patients With Difficult Airway

The purpose of this study is to identify differences in craniofacial morphology and tongue size between patients who have a history of difficult airway management and a control group of patients who had an uneventful airway management during induction of general anesthesia. In this study the investigators want to validate the hypothesis that there are craniofacial phenotypic differences between patients who have a history of difficult airway management and a control group of patients who have had an uneventful airway management during the induction of general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Difficult airway management is one of the most challenging tasks for anesthesiologists. Recent data from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Management Closed Claims Project [1] show that the percentage of claims resulting from adverse respiratory events, though on the decline (42% in the 1980s to 32% in the 1990s), continue to constitute a large source of morbidity and mortality in anesthetized patients. In 2005, a closed claims analysis of trends in anesthesia-related death and brain damage between 1975 and 2000 showed that out of all respiratory events (n=503) responsible for death and brain damage, difficult endotracheal intubation (n=115), inadequate oxygenation (n=111) and inadvertent esophageal intubation (n=66) were the top three causes [2].

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients that had undergone or will undergo a surgery under general anesthesia .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known history of syndromal craniofacial abnormalities (e.g. Down syndrome)
  • previous craniofacial surgery
  • excessive facial hair which significantly obscure facial landmarks
  • cervical spine fractures
  • tracheostomy tube
  • patients who are unable to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Difficult intubation patients
patients who were difficult to intubate during previous anesthetics provided by the staff anesthesiologists.
Procedure: 3D Laser Scanning of the Head
Five scans will be collected from different angles, each scan taking approximately 3 seconds. Each scan will consist of a thin beam of light flashing of your head.
Other Names:
  • 3D digitizing Konica Minolta 3D laser scanner
Procedure: Measurements and Digital Photo's of the head, neck and Mouth
Prior to the photographs, certain bone and soft tissue areas such as angle of the jaw, neck and chin will be gently touched and marked with self-adhesive paper stickers. Using the self-adhesive paper stickers and a measuring tape, we obtain measurements of your head and neck. You will be also asked to open your mouth and a digital photograph of the back of the mouth will be taken, as well as, pictures of the front and side of the head and neck.
Other Names:
  • General Electric Total access ultrasound
Procedure: Ultrasound Exam of the Tongue
The ultrasound study of the tongue will be performed after the series of laser scans. You will be examined in the sitting position. A small,handheld, curved ultrasound instrument will be placed under the chin to take images of the tongue. This exam should take less than a minute
Other Names:
  • General Electric Total access ultrasound
Procedure: Measurements and Digital Photo's of the head, neck and Mouth
Prior to the photographs, certain bone and soft tissue areas such as angle of the jaw, neck and chin will be gently touched and marked with self-adhesive paper stickers. Using the self-adhesive paper stickers and a measuring tape, we obtain measurements of your head and neck.Digital Photographs of your Mouth - You will be also asked to open your mouth and a digital photograph of the back of the mouth will be taken, as well as, pictures of the front and side of the head and neck.
Other Names:
  • 3D digitizing konica minolta 3D laser scanner
Procedure: Ultrasound Exam of the Tongue
The ultrasound study of the tongue will be performed after the series of laser scans. You will be examined in the sitting position. A small,handheld, curved ultrasound instrument will be placed under the chin to take images of the tongue. This exam should take less than a minute.
Other Names:
  • General Electric Total Access ultrasound
Placebo Comparator: Control
The control group will consist of patients with the easy laryngoscopy and intubation, recruited prospectively.
Procedure: 3D Laser Scanning of the Head
Five scans will be collected from different angles, each scan taking approximately 3 seconds. Each scan will consist of a thin beam of light flashing of your head.
Other Names:
  • 3D digitizing Konica Minolta 3D laser scanner
Procedure: Measurements and Digital Photo's of the head, neck and Mouth
Prior to the photographs, certain bone and soft tissue areas such as angle of the jaw, neck and chin will be gently touched and marked with self-adhesive paper stickers. Using the self-adhesive paper stickers and a measuring tape, we obtain measurements of your head and neck. You will be also asked to open your mouth and a digital photograph of the back of the mouth will be taken, as well as, pictures of the front and side of the head and neck.
Other Names:
  • General Electric Total access ultrasound
Procedure: Ultrasound Exam of the Tongue
The ultrasound study of the tongue will be performed after the series of laser scans. You will be examined in the sitting position. A small,handheld, curved ultrasound instrument will be placed under the chin to take images of the tongue. This exam should take less than a minute
Other Names:
  • General Electric Total access ultrasound
Procedure: Measurements and Digital Photo's of the head, neck and Mouth
Prior to the photographs, certain bone and soft tissue areas such as angle of the jaw, neck and chin will be gently touched and marked with self-adhesive paper stickers. Using the self-adhesive paper stickers and a measuring tape, we obtain measurements of your head and neck.Digital Photographs of your Mouth - You will be also asked to open your mouth and a digital photograph of the back of the mouth will be taken, as well as, pictures of the front and side of the head and neck.
Other Names:
  • 3D digitizing konica minolta 3D laser scanner
Procedure: Ultrasound Exam of the Tongue
The ultrasound study of the tongue will be performed after the series of laser scans. You will be examined in the sitting position. A small,handheld, curved ultrasound instrument will be placed under the chin to take images of the tongue. This exam should take less than a minute.
Other Names:
  • General Electric Total Access ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Hyomental Distance Ratio
Time Frame: end of study approximately one year
A curved low-frequency transducer and a Flex focul 400 ultrasound system were used to visualize the tongue and shadows of the hyoid bone and mandible. Midsagittal and coronal/transverse scans from the ultrasound were analyzed using ImageJ. The hyomental distances in the neutral and heal-extended positions were measured from the upper border of the hyoid bone to the lower border of the mentum. The ratio is defined as the ratio of the hyomental distance at the extreme of head extension to that in the neutral position.
end of study approximately one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Tongue Volume
Time Frame: end of study approximately one year
The midsagittal scans were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the tongue. Transverse scans obtained in the midsection of the tongue (at the glossal end of the genioglossus muscle) provided a measure of the tongue width, which was measured between the most distant points on its upper surface. The tongue volume was derived from the multiplication of the midsagittal cross-sectional area by the tongue width.
end of study approximately one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jacek Wojtczak, MD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RSRB case number: 00032136

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings