BT062 in Combination With Lenalidomide or Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

July 22, 2019 updated by: Biotest Pharmaceuticals Corporation

A Phase I/IIa Multi-dose Escalation Study of BT062 in Combination With Lenalidomide or Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to test safety and anti-tumor activity of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone to define the best doses for treating patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

BT062 is an antibody-drug conjugate designed to bind and destroy Myeloma cells. The study drug is being given in multiple doses with standard Multiple Myeloma treatments, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, to test how well the treatments are tolerated and work together. This study is a dose escalation study with the purpose to find out the highest dose of BT062 that a subject can tolerate in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic
      • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33028
        • Memorial Healthcare System
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Winship Cancer Institute
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • The University of Chicago
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas Health Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of active Multiple Myeloma according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
  • Relapsed or relapsed/refractory progressive Multiple Myeloma
  • Subjects who failed at least one prior therapy (BT062/Len/dex)
  • Subjects who failed at least two prior therapy (BT062/Pom/dex)
  • Subjects age ≥18 years
  • Life expectancy of ≥12 weeks
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (Zubrod) ≤2
  • Normal organ and bone marrow
  • Signed written informed consent in accordance with federal, local, and institutional guidelines
  • Subjects must agree to follow all Guidelines from REVLIMID REMS Program or POMALYST REMS
  • Women of child bearing potential (WCBP), must agree to use 2 contraceptive methods

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 3 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to day 1 or those who have not recovered from adverse events (AEs) due to agents administered more than 3 weeks earlier
  • Antineoplastic therapy with biological agents within 2 weeks before day 1 or within 5 drug half-lives (t½) prior to first dose, whichever time period is longer
  • Concomitant antineoplastic therapies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or biological agents during the study
  • Treatment with another investigational drug during the study or within 3 weeks before day 1 or within 5 drug half-live (t½) prior to first dose, whichever time period is longer
  • Treatment with BT062 in previous studies
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks before day 1 (this does not include placement of vascular access device or tumor biopsies)
  • Malignancy within 3 years before day 1, other than the trial indication multiple myeloma and excluding treated non-melanoma skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and prostate carcinoma ≤ Gleason Grade 6 with stable prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels
  • Subjects with plasma cell leukemia (PCL)
  • Subjects with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary embolism (PE) within 3 months prior to day 1 treatment
  • Severe infections necessitating use of antibiotics / antivirals during the screening period
  • Clinically relevant active infection including active hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HBV, HCV, or HIV) or any other concurrent disease
  • Acute or relevant abnormalities in electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Significant cardiac disease
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Positive serum or urine pregnancy test
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients for study drug BT062, or history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reaction to therapeutic proteins (e.g. reaction to vaccination or to biological therapy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BT062
BT062 administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, and lenalidomide or pomalidomide and dexamethasone administered orally to subjects with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM
Drug: BT062 , intravenous administration
Dose escalation to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and/or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended Phase II dose (RPTD) of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone
Other Names:
  • Indatuximab Ravtansine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of optimal dose of BT062 (Phase I part)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Phase I part will follow a standard dose escalation design with at least 3 patients per dose level to define optimal dose of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone. Optimal dose will be defined by dose limiting toxicities (DLT) observed during Cycle 1 (28 days).
6 months
Evaluation of response (Phase IIa part)
Time Frame: 18 months
Response to treatment with optimal dose of BT062 (defined in Phase I part) in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or pomalidomide/dexamethasone will be evaluated at baseline and at start of each Cycle (every 28 days). Response evaluation will be primarily based on assessment of M-protein and serum free light chains. If clinically required bone marrow analysis, plasmacytoma evaluation, and skeletal survey will be performed.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative toxicities of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or pomalidomide/dexamethasone
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety will be assessed at each visit by incidence of adverse events and by clinically significant changes in the patients physical examination, vital signs, and clinically laboratory results
24 months
Pharmacokinetics of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or pomalidomide/dexamethasone
Time Frame: 24 months
Pharmacokinetic parameters will be assessed from plasma by measuring intact BT062 and free maytansinoid (DM4)
24 months
Assessment of Time To Event end points
Time Frame: 24 months
Based on the response evaluation, the following Time To Event end points will be evaluated: Time To Progression, Progression Free Survival, Time To Next Treatment, Duration Of Response, Overall survival.
24 months
Quantitative toxicities of BT062 in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or pomalidomide/dexamethasone
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety will be assessed at each visit by incidence of adverse events and by clinically significant changes in the patients physical examination, vital signs, and clinically laboratory results
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Biotest Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Biotest

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Kenneth C Anderson, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 3, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 983

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings