Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Use of Ozone Versus Sunflower Oil in Treating Diabetic Foot (PHIOZO0110)

July 16, 2012 updated by: Philozon Geradores de Ozonio LTDA

Clinical Trial, Open, Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Use of Ozone Released by Philozon Medplus Device Versus Conventional Therapy in Treating Patients With Diabetic Foot.

This is a open, phase III, multicenter, prospective, comparative, controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of ozone released by Philozon Medplus device versus conventional therapy in treating patients with diabetic foot.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  • Clinical trial, open, phase III, multicenter, prospective, comparative, controlled, randomized to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of ozone released by Philozon Medplus device versus conventional therapy in treating patients with diabetic foot.
  • Primary Objective: evaluate the efficacy and safety of ozone released by the device Philozon Medplus in the treatment of patients with diabetic foot.
  • Secondary objective: evaluate ozone analyzer by environmental ozone Philozon Medplus released by the device in the clinical setting after using the device for rectal insufflation in a patient with diabetic foot.
  • Study population: Patients of both sexes, consisting of 100 patients over 18 years, patients with diabetic foot.
  • Treatment: 50 patients receive ozone therapy (topical and rectal insufflation of ozone). 50 patients will receive conventional treatment (Sunflower Oil).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Rio Grande do Sul
      • Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 99010-080
        • Recruiting
        • Associação Hospitalar Beneficente São Vicente de Paulo
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Renato T Santos, Investigator

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consent form signed;
  • Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type I or Type II trophic lesions presenting in the lower limbs;
  • Injury whose largest diameter is less than 5 cm;
  • Patients of both sexes, aged above 18 years;
  • Heart rate 60 to 100 bpm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe septic conditions;
  • IMC > 30;
  • Presence of Lymphedema;
  • Presence of trophic lesions in the lower limbs: exudative, traumatic and parasitic;
  • Trophic lesions caused by venous disease requiring treatment;
  • Hepatic or renal dysfunction;
  • History of alcohol abuse and drugs in the last 6 months;
  • Laboratory parameters:
  • hemoglobin < 10 g/dl;
  • Glycated hemoglobin > 9%;
  • Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism (TSH < 0.50 μUI/mL, free T4 > 1.80 ng/dL);
  • Deficit of Glucose 6 Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) > 20%;
  • Use of immunosuppressive drugs or anticonvulsants;
  • Pregnant woman or lactating;
  • Any significant medical condition which in the opinion of the Investigator may bring risks to the patient;
  • Known hypersensitivity to drugs and/or treatments to be used in the study;
  • Inability to compliance with the protocol;
  • Participation in another clinical trial for less than 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ozone therapy
The research subject will receive topical and rectal insufflation of ozone three times a week on alternate days for two months or at least 12 sessions.
Other: sunflower oil
The research subjects allocated to this treatment arm will receive Sunflower Oil supplied by Philozon. Sunflower oil should be applied once daily for 60 days, it immediately after cleansing site where the lesion is present.
Active Comparator: sunflower oil

The research subjects allocated to this treatment arm will receive Sunflower Oil supplied by Philozon. Sunflower oil should be applied once daily for 60 days, it immediately after cleansing site where the lesion is present.

Other Names:

Sunflower oil
Other: Ozone Therapy
The research subject will receive topical and rectal insufflation of ozone three times a week on alternate days for two months or at least 12 sessions.
Other Names:
  • Philozon, MedPlus, Ozone Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the efficacy and safety of ozone released by the device Philozon Medplus in the treatment of patients with diabetic foot.
Time Frame: 65 days
Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the release of ozone Medplus Philozon device in the treatment of patients with diabetic foot, through the clinical evaluation by the investigator based on the time needed for healing and decreasing the larger diameter of the lesion to be accompanied by image (photo), which register the size of the lesion in centimeters with a ruler.
65 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the release of ozone in the environment by equipment MEdplus after insufflation rectal in patients with diabetic foot.
Time Frame: 65 days
Evaluate using ozone analyzer environmental ozone released by the device Philozon Medplus in the clinical setting after using the device for rectal insufflation in a patient with diabetic foot.
65 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Philozon Geradores de Ozonio LTDA

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Luiz L Pfluck, Investigator, Pronto Socorro de Fraturas
  • Principal Investigator: Marcelo C Burihan, Investigator, Hospital Santa Marcelina
  • Principal Investigator: Renato t Santos, Investigator, Associação Hospitalar Beneficente São Vicente de Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 16, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PHI-OZO-01-10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings