Aerobic Exercise Training in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ENDURANCE)

September 8, 2013 updated by: Alessandro Mezzani, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri

Exercise traiNing in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: a ranDomized Trial Comparing Home-based Aerobic endUrance tRAiNing vs. Usual physiCal Therapy intErvention

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and the effects of moderate-intensity aerobic endurance training to those of an usual physical therapy intervention on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Scarce evidence is available regarding aerobic exercise training of patients with ALS. Some studies using transgenic mouse models of familial ALS have shown markedly slowed disease progression, improved functional capacity, and extension of survival in animals undergoing aerobic exercise training. In humans, only one non-randomized study has shown that moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training was of little beneficial effect in a small group of patients with Kennedy disease, a rare X-linked progressive neuromuscular disease involving lower motorneurons, presenting a pathophysiological picture quite different from that of ALS. To the best of our knowledge, the safety and the effects of aerobic exercise training on functional capacity and quality of life of patients with ALS have not been systematically evaluated as yet in a randomized, controlled trial with an adequate sample size.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Veruno, Italy, 28010
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Veruno
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alessandro Mezzani, MD, FESC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of definite ALS, probable ALS, or probable-laboratory supported ALS according to the El Escorial criteria or diagnosis of progressive muscular atrophy.
  • Ability to perform a baseline symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test with attainment of peak power and respiratory exchange ratio of >= 50 W and >= 1.00, respectively.
  • Time since symptoms onset <= 18 months.
  • Forced vital capacity >= 70% of predicted.
  • Informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coexisting neurological disease.
  • Coexisting extra-neurological disease significantly affecting exercise capacity.
  • Coexisting malignancy.
  • Ongoing/planned pregnancy.
  • Involvement in formal endurance and/or strength training program.
  • Enrolment in any other clinical trial.
  • Cognitive impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Aerobic exercise training
Other: Aerobic exercise training
Intensity: heart rate corresponding to 40% peak VO2. Frequency: 5 sessions/week. Duration: 5 min warm-up + 20 min training + 5 min cool-down during the 1st month; 5 min warm-up + 30 min training + 5 min cool-down during the 2nd and 3rd month
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard physical therapy
Other: Standard physical therapy (Stretching/Range-of-motion)
Intensity: N/A. Frequency: 5 sessions/week. Duration: 5 min warm-up + 20 min training + 5 min cool-down during the 1st month; 5 min warm-up + 30 min training + 5 min cool-down during the 2nd and 3rd month

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2)
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on peak VO2, as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aerobic training safety and tolerability
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate aerobic training safety and tolerability in terms of adverse events incidence and adherence to training program
3 months
Change from baseline in quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on quality of life, as assessed by McGill questionary
3 months
Change from baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) score
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on the ALSFRS-R score
3 months
Change from baseline in lower limbs muscle strength
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on isometric muscle strength of lower limbs, as assessed by isometric dynamometry
3 months
Change from baseline in upper and lower motor neurons function at the upper and lower limbs level
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on upper and lower motor neurons function at the upper and lower limbs level, as determined by compound muscle action potential and neurophysiological index and motor evoked potentials
3 months
Change from baseline in ventilatory function
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on ventilatory function, as assessed by spirometry and measurement of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures
3 months
Change from baseline in circulating inflammatory markers, growth factors and descriptors of skeletal muscle damage
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effects of aerobic training on circulating inflammatory markers and growth factors (CRP, TNF-alfa, IL-6, Angiogenin, Angiopoietin 1 and 2, Thrombospondin, VEGF, BDNF, IGF-1) and markers of skeletal muscle damage (CPK)
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro Mezzani, MD, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Veruno
  • Study Director: Fabrizio Pisano, MD, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Veruno

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 10, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CEC641

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings