European Clinical Evaluation of the BD HPV Assay on the BD Viper LT System

February 19, 2014 updated by: Becton, Dickinson and Company
The purpose of the study is to compare the results of the Becton Dickinson (BD) Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Assay on the Viper LT instrument from SurePath media diluted in HPV diluent (pre-quot and/or residual), PreservCyt media diluted in HPV diluent (pre-quot and/or residual) and a BD cervical brush in BD transport medium to reference histology results from biopsy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter study consisting of 2-3 European clinical trial sites, and up to 2 BD Viper LT Systems.

The BD HPV Diluent tube will be run on the BD HPV assay with the Viper LT instrument and compared to histology, Digene hybrid capture 2 (HC2), and Roche LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test results.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1365

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Hvidovre, Denmark
        • Hvidovre Hospital
  • Italy
      • Milan, Italy
        • European Institute of Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study includes retrospectively (residual, frozen) collected SurePath or PreservCyt vials and prospectively collected BD cervical brushes in BD transport medium, and SurePath or PreservCyt vials from subjects who meet the inclusion criteria below.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Referred to follow up due to one or more abnormal Pap or an HPV infection
  • Subjects who have provided informed consent
  • Subjects who meet the minimum age set forth by the ethics committee (EC) and/or national screening guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to be pregnant
  • With prior complete or partial hysterectomy involving removal of cervix
  • Subjects with an application of chemical compounds to the cervical area 24 hour prior to study entry- this includes acetic acid, iodine, spermicide, douche, anti-fungal meds.
  • Subjects on who conization, Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), laser surgery or cryosurgery has been performed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the BD HPV Assay with 95% confidence intervals for detecting cervical disease as defined by Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2) or higher.
Time Frame: Nine months
Sensitivity is calculated: Number of subjects with positive BD HPV test and with histology results of CIN2 or greater divided by the total number of subjects with histology results of CIN2 or greater
Nine months
Specificity of the BD HPV Assay with 95% confidence intervals for detecting cervical disease as defined by Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2) or higher.
Time Frame: Nine months
Specificity is calculated: Number of subjects with a negative BD HPV test and with histology results of less than CIN2 divided by the total number of subjects with histology results of less than CIN2.
Nine months
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of the BD HPV Assay with 95% confidence intervals for detecting cervical disease as defined by Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2) or higher.
Time Frame: Nine months
Positive Predictive Value is calculated: Number of subjects with a positive BD HPV test and with histology results of CIN2 or greater divided by the total number of subjects with a positive BD HPV test.
Nine months
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the BD HPV Assay with 95% confidence intervals for detecting cervical disease as defined by Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2) or higher.
Time Frame: Nine months
Negative Predictive Value is calculated: Number of subjects with a negative result for the BD HPV test and histology results less than CIN2 divided by the total number of subjects with negative results for the BD HPV test.
Nine months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The positive percent agreement of the BD HPV Assay compared to digene hybrid capture (HC2) test and Roche LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test
Time Frame: 9 months
Positive percent agreement is calculated: The number of subjects with positive BD HPV test and positive results for the HC2 test and Roche Linear Array HPV divided by total of subjects with positive results for HC2 test and Roche Linear Array HPV.
9 months
Negative percent agreement of the BD HPV Assay compared to digene hybrid capture (HC2) test and Roche LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test
Time Frame: Nine months
Negative percent agreement is calculated: The number of subjects with negative BD HPV test and negative results for the HC2 test and Roche Linear Array HPV divided by total of subjects with negative results for HC2 test and Roche Linear Array HPV test.
Nine months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Becton, Dickinson and Company

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Irene Hannet, MD, Becton, Dickinson and Company

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 20, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MDX-11-EUHPV

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings