Comparison of Capso Vision SV-1 to PillCam SB2 in the Evaluation of Subjects With Suspected Small Bowel Disease

March 31, 2017 updated by: Capso Vision, Inc.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical findings involving the small bowel obtained with the Capso Vision Video Capsule Device to those results obtained with the PillCam SB2.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, comparative multi-center site study. The study will be conducted at 5 to 10 clinical sites. Up to 120 subjects will be enrolled in the study in order to obtain complete endoscopic results involving at least 98 subjects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
121

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2K5
        • Pacific Gastroenterology Associates GI Research Institute
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Shabana F. Pasha, MD
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Gastro Health
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts, Worcester
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
        • Ziad Younes, MD
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female between 18 to 85 years of age (inclusive).
  2. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  3. Subjects with suspected small bowel disease who are referred for capsule endoscopy. Suspected small bowel disease includes suspected small bowel bleeding (including obscure gastrointestinal bleed), suspected or established Crohn's Disease [should have had patency capsule, CT or MR enterography before entry], suspected or known celiac disease, suspected small bowel tumor or familial polyposis syndrome.
  4. If subject was referred for capsule endoscopy (CE) for identification of occult GI bleeding, has the subject undergone a non-diagnostic esophagoduodenoscopy and colonoscopy as part of their evaluation, OR has the subject had continued bleeding requiring transfusion since the initial evaluation, OR does the subject have the following hematocrit values <31% in males or <28% in females.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who had a prior negative capsule endoscopy (within 1 year of study).
  2. Known or suspected obstruction or stricture unless patency capsule confirms patency.
  3. Known or suspected gastrointestinal perforation.
  4. Known or suspected small bowel diverticuli.
  5. Known swallowing disorder or the inability or unwillingness to swallow pills.
  6. Radiation or chemotherapy induced enteritis.
  7. History of Zenker's or known duodenal or jejunal diverticula.
  8. Isolated diarrhea or isolated abdominal pain without alarm signs or symptoms
  9. Subjects who are high risk for undergoing surgical interventions (i.e., to CONFIDENTIAL CapsoVision Protocol SV-1 Revision: October 17, 2011 7 remove the capsule when capsule retention occurs).
  10. Subjects with DNR/DNI "do not resuscitate/do not intubate" status.
  11. Known or suspected gastrointestinal dysmotility.
  12. Presence of cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other electromedical implant.
  13. History of skin reaction to adhesives.
  14. Subjects who in the Investigator's opinion should not consume the 2L GoLytely and 10 mg bisacodyl study drugs, because it could pose a significant additional risk to the subject because of the subject's medical condition.
  15. Subjects who are scheduled for an MRI within 30 days of the last study visit.
  16. Pregnancy; females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening.
  17. Prisoners.
  18. Mental and/or physical condition precluding compliance with the study and/or device instructions.
  19. Participation in another clinical study within past 30 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: PillCam SB2 then CapsoCam SV-1
PillCam SB2 capsule then CapsoCam SV-1 capsule
Device: PillCam SB2 capsule
Capsule Endoscopy system
Other Names:
  • capsule endoscopy system
Device: CapsoCam SV-1
Capsule endoscopy
Other Names:
  • Capsule endoscopy
Other: CapsoCam SV-1 then PillCam SB2
CapsoCam SV-1 capsule then PillCam SB2 capsule
Device: PillCam SB2 capsule
Capsule Endoscopy system
Other Names:
  • capsule endoscopy system
Device: CapsoCam SV-1
Capsule endoscopy
Other Names:
  • Capsule endoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normal vs Abnormal, Overall Impression
Time Frame: Study Completion
The review of images of suspected diseased small bowel to determine agreement among readers between the two image capture systems: CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2. The proportion of Normal vs Abnormal, Overall Impression based upon the result of 2 out of 3 data readers in agreement.
Study Completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of SB Transit Times With CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2
Time Frame: Study Completion
Total transit time, was determined the time the 1st Duodenal image to the 1st cecal or IC Valve image as determined by the readers.
Study Completion
Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of CapsoCam SV-1 as Compared to PillCam SB2
Time Frame: Study Completion
Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of CapsoCam SV-1 as compared to PillCam SB: Proportion of primary diagnostic yields based upon the result of 2 out of 3 readers in agreement or the consensus group result.
Study Completion
Preference Between CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2
Time Frame: Study Completion
Subject preference between CapsoCam SV-1 and PillCam SB2 based on pill preference questionnaire administered to subjects
Study Completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Capso Vision, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shabana F Pasha, MD, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Capso Vision SV-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings