Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Latinamerica and EMEA Region (XANTUS-EL)

June 20, 2017 updated by: Bayer

XANTUS-EL, Xarelto® on Prevention of Stroke and Noncentral Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Eastern EU, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) and Latin America (LATAM): A Non-interventional Study

This international study is a prospective noninterventional observational cohort study of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are prescribed rivaroxaban under routine treatment conditions to prevent stroke or non-central nervous system systemic embolism. Patients will be followed up for 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy in case of therapy was discontinued earlier than 12 months. Serious adverse events will be followed up adequately. Laboratory values (e.g., Hb, HCT, haemoccult) should be documented for each point in time they were measured.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2101

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are prescribed rivaroxaban under routine treatment conditions to prevent stroke or noncentral nervous system systemic embolism.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female and male patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation who start treatment with rivaroxaban to prevent stroke or non-CNS systemic embolism, and who consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group 1
Drug: Rivaroxaban (Xarelto, BAY59-7939)
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are prescribed Rivaroxaban under routine treatment conditions to prevent stroke or non-central nervous system systemic embolism. Decision regarding dose and duration of treatment made at the discretion of the attending investigator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adjudicated major bleeding events
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Safety variables will be summarized using descriptivestatistics based on adverse events collection
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
All cause mortality
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adjudicated symptomatic thromboembolic events
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Non-major bleeding, collected as SAEs or non-serious AEs and defined as all bleeding events that do not fall in the category of major bleedings
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Adverse events rates in the different AF risk factor categories
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Persistence with rivaroxaban treatment
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Reasons for switch of rivaroxaban treatment
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Reasons for interruption of rivaroxaban treatment
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Healthcare resource
Time Frame: after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later
Number of healthcare professional visits and hospitalizations due to anticoagulation therapy
after 1 year or until 30 days after end of rivaroxaban therapy, whichever is later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 14, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 16, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 20, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16691
  • XA1206 (Other Identifier: Company internal)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings