Safety and Tolerability Study With Single Ascending Doses of ODM-102

February 7, 2014 updated by: Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Escalating Doses of ODM-102: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single Centre Study in Healthy Males

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating single doses of ODM-102 in healthy volunteers

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Turku, Finland, 20520
        • Clinical Research Services Turku, CRST

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent (IC) obtained.
  • Good general health ascertained by detailed medical history and physical examination.
  • Finnish-speaking males between 18 and 45 years of age (inclusive).
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18.0-30.5 kg/m2 (inclusive).
  • Weight 55.0-100.0 kg (inclusive).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected poor compliance or inability to communicate well with the investigator.
  • Veins unsuitable for repeated venipuncture.
  • Evidence of clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, haematological, gastro-intestinal, pulmonary, metabolic-endocrine, neurological, urogenital or psychiatric disease as judged by the investigator.
  • Any condition requiring regular concomitant drug treatment, including herbal products, or likely to need any concomitant drug treatment during the study.
  • Susceptibility to severe allergic reactions.
  • Intake of any medication that could affect the outcome of the study within 2 weeks prior to the first study drug administration or within less than 5 times the elimination half-life of the medication.
  • Regular consumption of more than 21 units of alcohol per week (1 unit = 4 cl spirits, about 13 g of alcohol).
  • Current use of nicotine-containing products more than 5 cigarettes or equivalent/day.
  • Inability to refrain from using nicotine-containing products during the stay in the study centre.
  • Inability to refrain from consuming caffeine-containing beverages during the first 24 hours after treatment administration e.g. propensity to experience headache when abstaining from caffeine-containing beverages.
  • Blood donation or loss of a significant amount of blood within 2 months prior to the screening visit.
  • Abnormal 12-lead ECG finding of clinical relevance after 10 min rest in supine position at the screening visit
  • HR < 45 beats/minute or > 90 beats/minute after 10 minutes rest in supine position at the screening visit.
  • At the screening visit, systolic BP < 90 mmHg or > 140 mmHg after 10 minutes in supine position, diastolic BP < 50 mmHg or > 90 mmHg after 10 minutes in supine position, or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, or decrease of ≥ 20 mmHg of systolic BP or decrease of ≥ 10 mmHg of diastolic BP after 3 minutes in standing position.
  • Abnormal 24-hour Holter ECG recording of possible or confirmed clinical relevance
  • Any abnormal laboratory value, vital sign, or physical examination finding, which may in the opinion of the investigator interfere with the interpretation of the test results or cause a health risk to the subject if he takes part in the study.
  • Suspected current use of illicit drugs (according to medical history enquiry or physical examination), positive drug screen or history of long-term drug abuse.
  • Positive serology to human immunodeficiency virus antigen/antibodies (HIVAgAb), hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis C virus antibodies (HCVAb).
  • Participation in another clinical drug study within 3 months prior to the first treatment administration in this study.
  • Any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the evaluation of the results or constitute a health risk for the subject.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Each subject will receive 2 single doses of study drug, either both of them active doses or the other placebo.
Drug: Placebo for ODM-102
Single dose escalation
EXPERIMENTAL: ODM-102
Each subject will receive 2 single doses of study drug, either both of them active doses or the other placebo.
Drug: ODM-102
Single dose escalation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety measures, i.e. assessing adverse events, vital signs, ECG and safety laboratory values
Time Frame: about a month
about a month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics
Time Frame: 5 days per period
Explore the PK profile (e.g. Cmax, tmax, AUC, t1/2), screen circulating metabolites and determine protein binding.
5 days per period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3099003

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings