Supporting Treatment Adherence Regimens in Pediatric Epilepsy: The STAR Trial

January 22, 2020 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Fifty-eight percent of children with new-onset epilepsy do not take their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as prescribed (i.e., non-adherence). Non-adherence, which is modifiable, is associated with continued seizures, mortality, poor quality of life, and high healthcare costs. There are no adherence interventions for young children with epilepsy and their families; thus, the current proposal examines a family-based behavioral treatment focused on improving epilepsy knowledge and problem-solving around barriers to adherence in young children with epilepsy and their families with the goal of improving adherence and ultimately, seizures and quality of life. It is hypothesized that children with newly diagnosed epilepsy and their families who participate in the problem-solving intervention will have significant improvements on adherence compared to those in the education only intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a common (i.e., 58% of patients have some level of non-adherence) and previously under-recognized problem for young children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. This is surprising given the consequences of non-adherence in patients with epilepsy are extremely serious, including continued seizures, mortality, and high healthcare expenditures. Despite the critical need to develop and implement interventions to improve adherence, there are no family-based interventions for young children with epilepsy and their families. As such, we developed a family-tailored adherence intervention (STAR: Supporting Treatment Adherence Regimens) focused on increasing epilepsy knowledge and problem-solving skills around barriers to adherence for children with epilepsy and their families. Data from our pilot adherence intervention studies demonstrated good preliminary effects (effect size= 0.64) and excellent feasibility, with families reporting that the intervention was beneficial and a positive experience for their family. Capitalizing on these findings, the next logical step is to test the efficacy of the STAR intervention to improve AED adherence in 200 children with epilepsy via a randomized controlled trial. Thus, the aims of the study are to examine the short-term and long-term effects of the STAR intervention on electronically-monitored medication adherence in children with new-onset epilepsy compared to an education only (EO) intervention. In addition, exploratory aims are to examine the effect of the STAR intervention on seizure freedom and QOL in children with epilepsy compared to the EO intervention. The current study uses an innovative, sequential, randomization enrichment design that preventatively targets 200 patients with new-onset epilepsy, between 2-12 years, who demonstrate non-adherence. Using criteria established from our pilot studies, adherence falling below 95% within the first six months of the study will trigger participant randomization into one of two 8-session interventions: STAR or EO. If the aims of the project are achieved, this study will change the practice of pediatric epilepsy by providing a proven approach to the routine monitoring and treatment of AED non-adherence in epilepsy clinics across the nation. This study also lays the foundation for determining the long term impact of adherence intervention on morbidity and mortality. In addition, this study's innovative methodological enrichment design should be generalizable to other pediatric conditions and lead to the development of cost effective, clinic-based adherence promotion interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ages 2-12 years
  • diagnosis of epilepsy within approximately 6 months
  • only one prescribed AED
  • family lives < 75 miles from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC)
  • ability to read English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comorbid medical disorders requiring daily medication
  • parent-reported significant developmental delays (e.g. Autism)
  • liquid AED formulation due to electronic monitoring incompatibility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Education Only
Education only arm (8 total sessions)
Behavioral: Education Only
Education around epilepsy (8 total sessions)
Experimental: STAR: Education and Problem Solving
Problem-solving and education intervention (8 total sessions)
Behavioral: STAR
Problem-solving and education intervention (8 total sessions)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence rate (short-term)
Time Frame: 30 day post intervention adherence rate
This is a measure of adherence, using an electronic monitor called the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) TrackCap, and adherence rates range from 0 to 100%. Adherence rates will be calculated at baseline and represent a rate from 0 to 100. Similarly, an adherence rate will be calculated for the 30 day post intervention period, with a rate between 0-100%. The change score for the mean of the 30 days of adherence immediately following the end of intervention relative to the mean adherence obtained during the30 day screening period will be calculated.
30 day post intervention adherence rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence rate (long-term)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
This is a measure of adherence, using an electronic monitor called the MEMS TrackCap, and adherence rates range from 0 to 100%. The outcome will be a comparison of baseline 30 day adherence, which ranges from 0 to 100%, to the 3, 6, and 12 month post intervention adherence to antiepileptic drugs (0-100%). A change score will be calculated between the baseline and long-term end points of 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months post intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months post intervention
Compare baseline quality of life scores (0-100), based on the PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life) questionnaire, compared to 6 and 12 months post intervention.
6 and 12 months post intervention
Seizure absence/presence
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months post intervention
Compare seizure absence/presence (0=no;1=yes) from baseline to 6 and 12 months post intervention
6 and 12 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Avani C Modi, Ph.D., Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 1, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01HD073115 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Not being shared

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings