Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
Laparoscopic Versus Open Adhesiolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction - A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
-
Lahti, Finland
- Päijät-Häme Central Hospital
-
Oulu, Finland
- Oulu University Hospital
-
Tampere, Finland
- Tampere University Hospital
-
Vaasa, Finland
- Vaasa Central Hospital
-
Vantaa, Finland
- Peijas Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy
- Bologna Maggiore Hospital
-
Parma, Italy
- Parma University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients with clinical and computed tomography-diagnosed adhesive small bowel obstruction AND
- Obstruction is not relieved by conservative methods (nasogastric tube, NPO) including Gastrografin is not passed to colon within 8 hours (48-hour conservative treatment without Gastrografin® is allowed if Gastrografin® is contraindicated (e.g. allergy) or not available)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Strong suspicion of strangulation or clinical peritonitis thus indicating an urgent operative intervention
- Earlier confirmed or strongly suspected peritoneal carcinosis
- Earlier confirmed wide diffuse adhesions of abdominal cavity
- Earlier open surgery for endometriosis
- Earlier generalized diffuse peritonitis (not including local peritonitis such as appendicitis)
- Active abdominal malignancy or remission less than 10 years
- Earlier abdominal region radiotherapy
- Earlier obesity surgery
- 3 or more earlier open abdominal operations (not including caesarean section(s))
- Suspicion of other cause for obstruction than adhesions in CT-scan
- Earlier abdominal surgical operation within 30 days
- Earlier surgical operation for aorta or iliac vessels performed through laparotomy
- Crohn's disease
- Anesthesiological contraindication for laparoscopy
- Missing informed consent
- Age less than 18 years or over 95 years
- Pregnancy
- Patient living in institutional care (such as health centre ward), not including retirement homes
- Over 1 week of hospital stay directly prior surgical consultation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Open adhesiolysis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Post-operative hospital stay (days)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Passage of stools (post-operative days)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
Commence of enteral nutrition (post-operative days)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
|
30 days after randomization
|
|
Complications, Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
|
30 days after randomization
|
|
Number of participants with iatrogenic small bowel lesions
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
Number of participants with readmission(s)
Time Frame: 30 days after randomization
|
30 days after randomization
|
|
Number of participant with failure to relieve obstruction
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
Pain scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Postoperative days 1- 7 or till discharge
|
Postoperative days 1- 7 or till discharge
|
|
Length of epidural catheter analgesia (days)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
Total need of opioids in milligrams
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of post-operative hospital stay, an expected average of 7 days
|
|
Length of sick leave (days)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of sick leave, depending on occupation estimated 1-4 weeks
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of sick leave, depending on occupation estimated 1-4 weeks
|
|
Number of participants that develop ventral hernia
Time Frame: 10 years
|
10 years
|
|
Number of patient with recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction
Time Frame: 10 years
|
10 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ville Sallinen, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Study Director: Panu Mentula, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Study Chair: Ari Leppäniemi, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUCH-95-150513
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.