Comparison of the Frequency-altering AKE-1 Capsule and Pillcam SB2
A Double-center Randomized Head-to-head Comparison of the Frequency-altering AKE-1 Capsule and Pillcam SB2
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
- Wuhan Union Hospital
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433
- Shanghai Changhai Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
- chronic diarrhea
- suspected Crohn's disease
- chronic abdominal pain
- neoplastic lesions of small bowel
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with any contraindication to capsule endoscopy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pillcam SB2 first
patients were assigned to swallow PSB first, followed by the AKE
|
|
|
Experimental: AKE-1 first
patients were assigned to swallow AKE first, followed by the PSB
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
judgement of normal or abnormal of gastrointestinal tract
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the examination
|
If a lesion is detected by capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal tract in a patient, the result will be judged as abnormal.
|
5 weeks after the examination
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
complete small-bowel examination rate
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the examination
|
5 weeks after the examination
|
|
|
diagnostic yield
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the examination
|
The finding that could explain the symptom and resulted in clinical impact was considered as diagnosis.Diagnostic yield of a capsule endoscopy is the proportion of patients with positive diagnosis over total patients.
|
5 weeks after the examination
|
|
total recording time
Time Frame: 5 weeks after the examination
|
5 weeks after the examination
|
|
|
gastric transit time
Time Frame: the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
|
the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
|
|
|
small-bowel transit time
Time Frame: the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
|
the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
|
|
|
total number of images captured
Time Frame: the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
|
the comparison was completed 5 weeks after the examination
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
number of adverse events as a measure of safety
Time Frame: 2 months after the examination
|
2 months after the examination
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Zhao-Shen Li, Dr., Changhai Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cave DR, Fleischer DE, Leighton JA, Faigel DO, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Mergener K, Foley A, Lee M, Bhattacharya K. A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):487-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.037. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
- Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031.
- Dolak W, Kulnigg-Dabsch S, Evstatiev R, Gasche C, Trauner M, Puspok A. A randomized head-to-head study of small-bowel imaging comparing MiroCam and EndoCapsule. Endoscopy. 2012 Nov;44(11):1012-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310158. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- capsule-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.