Efficacy and Safety Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A Against Placebo to Treat Abnormal Contraction or Twitch of the Eyelid

February 28, 2018 updated by: Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Prospective, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study With an Open-label Extension Period to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Doses of NT 201 in Botulinum Toxin Treatment-naïve Subjects With Blepharospasm

This phase 3 study will serve to collect efficacy and safety data of two different doses of NT 201 in subjects suffering from Bilateral Blepharospasm (BEB) who are BTX treatment-naïve.

In this study, BTX treatment-naïve subjects are defined as those who have not received BTX treatment within the last 12 months for the treatment of BEB. This definition aims to avoid bias by comparison of treatment effects in the subject's assessments. Furthermore, this study will substantiate the existing efficacy and safety database for the indication BEB.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects to receive one injection with NT 201 or placebo at baseline of the placebo-controlled first cycle. Thereafter, all subjects entering the Open-Label Extension Period (OLEX) to receive a second injection of NT 201 (second injection cycle).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
61

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Athens, Greece, 11521
        • Merz Investigational Site #030002
      • Athens, Greece, 11526
        • Merz Investigational Site #030001
  • Malaysia
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 50586
        • Merz Investigational Site #060006
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 56000
        • Merz Investigational Site #060002
      • Selangor, Malaysia, 43000
        • Merz Investigational Site #060003
    • Penang
      • Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia, 10990
        • Merz Investigational Site #060007
    • Sabah
      • Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 88586
        • Merz Investigational Site #060004
  • Sri Lanka
      • Colombo, Sri Lanka, 07
        • Merz Investigational Site #094001
      • Colombo, Sri Lanka, 10350
        • Merz Investigational Site #094005
      • Kurunegala, Sri Lanka, 60000
        • Merz Investigational Site #094006
      • Nugegoda, Sri Lanka, 10250
        • Merz Investigational Site #094002

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female out-patients age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years.
  • A clinical diagnosis of bilateral BEB characterized by spontaneous, spasmodic, intermittent or persistent involuntary contractions of orbicular oculi muscles.
  • A need for injection of BTX defined as a Jankovic Rating Scale [JRS] severity subscore ≥ 2.
  • Treatment-naïve subject defined as at least 12 months without BTX of any serotype for the treatment of BEB before administration of IP.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with any previous unsuccessful treatment with BTX of any serotype for the treatment of BEB.
  • Atypical variant of BEB (e.g., apraxia of the eyelid opening) caused by inhibition of levator palpebrae muscle.
  • Neuroleptic-induced blepharospasm.
  • Myotomy or denervation surgery in the affected muscles (e.g., peripheral denervation, spinal cord stimulation) and surgery in the upper face.
  • Generalized disorders of muscles activity (e.g., myasthenia gravis in particular ocularis, Lambert-Eaton-Syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or any other significant neuromuscular dysfunction which might interfere with the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) 25U per eye
Main Period: one injection session, 25 Units per eye. Open-Label Extension: one injection session, up to 35 Units per eye. Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
Drug: IncobulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 25 Units
IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Main Period: 25 Units per eye.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 35 Units

IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).

Open-Label Extension: up to 35 Units per eye.

Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
Experimental: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) 12.5U per eye
Main Period: one injection session, 12.5 Units per eye. Open-Label Extension Period: one injection session, up to 35 Units per eye. Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 35 Units

IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).

Open-Label Extension: up to 35 Units per eye.

Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 12.5 Units
IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Main Period: 12.5 Units per eye.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Main Period: Placebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)(12.5 or 25U/eye), one injection session.

Open-Label Extension: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), one injection session, up to 35 Units per eye. Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.
Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 35 Units

IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).

Open-Label Extension: up to 35 Units per eye.

Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • NT 201
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
Drug: Placebo
Main Period: Placebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in JRS Severity Subscore at Day 43 (Visit 4)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)
JRS severity subscore was used to classify individual symptoms of blepharospasm and to determine therapeutic efficacy. JRS severity subscore ranges from 0 to 4, where 0: None; 1: increased blinking present with external stimuli; 2: Mild but spontaneous eyelid fluttering, definitely noticeable, possibly embarrassing, but not functionally disabling, 3: Moderate, very noticeable spasm of eyelids only, mildly incapacitating, 4: Severe, incapacitating spasm of eyelids and possibly other facial muscles. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and visit 4 resulting from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group, pooled site, and gender as fixed factors and baseline JRS severity subscore and age as covariates and missings replaced using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Negative values denote improvement, while positive values denote deterioration vs. baseline.
Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) at Day 43 (Visit 4)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)
BSDI is a scale for assessment of impairment of specific activities of daily living caused by blepharospasm. BSDI consists of six items (driving a vehicle; reading; watching TV; shopping; getting about on foot (walking); doing everyday activities), each ranging from 0 (=no impairment) to 4 (=no longer possible due to illness). The BSDI total score is a mean score for non-missing items ranging from 0 to 4. It is calculated by adding scores of all applicable and answered items, and dividing the resulting sum by the number of items answered. Outcome values represent LS mean differences between baseline and visit 4 (visit 4 value minus baseline value) resulting from ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site, gender as fixed factors and baseline BSDI total score, age as covariates. Missings were replaced by the LOCF method. Negative values denote an improvement, while positive values denote deterioration vs. baseline.
Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)
Double-blind MP: Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) at Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)
Time Frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)
PEGR scale is a descriptive subjective 9-point response self-rating scale ranging from "complete abolishment of signs and symptoms" (value=+4) down to "very marked worsening" (value=-4). Outcome values represent least square means at visit 4 resulting from an ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site, gender as fixed factors and age as covariates. Missing were set to a zero effect (value=0). Positive values denote an improvement, while negative values denote deterioration.
Baseline, Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MRZ60201_3074_1
  • 2012-004821-26 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bilateral Blepharospasm (BEB)

Clinical Trials on IncobulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 25 Units

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings