Pelvic Embolisation to Reduce Recurrent Varicose Veins - Recurrent

May 16, 2014 updated by: The Whiteley Clinic

A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating The Use Of Pelvic Vein Embolisation To Reduce Recurrent Varicose Veins Of The Legs In Women With Recurrent Varicose Veins And Associated Pelvic Venous Reflux.

The aim of this study is to identify whether the treatment of pelvic venous reflux (pelvic embolisation) in females with recurrent leg varicose veins, who have a proven contribution to their leg varicose veins from pelvic venous reflux, have a reduction in future recurrence after endovenous laser treatment for recurrent varicose veins in the legs.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Varicose veins of the legs effect between 20 and 40% of the adult population in the UK. Approximately 100,000 operations performed per year for varicose veins, although it is unknown how many of these are for recurrent varicose veins. Failure to treat varicose veins results in 10 to 20% of patients deteriorating to skin damage or leg ulceration. Recurrence rates following surgery vary and have been reported up to 70% at 10 years. Recurrence causes an increased cost as well as an increase in the patient's healthcare requirements.

The commonest causes of recurrence are reported to be:

  • neovascularisation (new vessel growth after treatment)
  • missing veins at the initial operation
  • perforator vein incompetence
  • de novo reflux due to normal deterioration with age

Recent studies have shown that leg varicose veins can be caused by pelvic venous reflux and that pelvic venous reflux is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Previous published work from our own unit has shown that approximately 20% of women who present with varicose veins of the legs and who have had children previously have pelvic venous reflux on duplex ultrasound. Such pelvic venous reflux contributes to the venous reflux in the legs, causing the varicose veins. Furthermore, a recent retrospective study from our own unit has suggested that failure to treat pelvic venous reflux before treating leg varicose veins is a major cause of recurrent varicose veins in up to a quarter of women.

However, despite this circumstantial evidence, there is no evidence to prove whether the treatment of pelvic venous reflux confers any advantage on these patients in terms of reduction in future recurrence of their varicose veins, following treatment.

The treatment of pelvic venous reflux is currently by coil embolisation of the veins under x-ray control. This procedure clearly has an additional cost over and above that of treating the leg varicose veins alone. Therefore it is essential to know whether the treatment of the pelvic veins in these patients has any effect in reducing future recurrence of leg varicose veins.

To examine the benefits of coil embolisation, female patients presenting with recurrent leg varicose veins with a duplex proven contribution from pelvic venous reflux will be randomised to:

  1. transjugular coil embolisation of pelvic veins followed by endovenous treatment of leg recurrent varicose veins

    or

  2. endovenous treatment of leg recurrent varicose veins alone

The impact of demographic factors, the severity of patient's symptoms(Aberdeen questionnaire, CEAP and VCCS scores)and treatment history will be explored, in addition to the type of treatment received.

Patients will be followed up at six weeks, six months, one year, two years, three years, four years and five years.

Outcome measures will include quality-of-life scoring (CIVIQ), symptom severity measures (Aberdeen questionnaire, CEAP and VCCS scores), patient satisfaction with treatment and clinical examination including clinical photographs and duplex ultrasonography.

The source of any recurrence will be classified through the use of duplex ultrasonography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Guildford, United Kingdom, GU2 7RF
        • The Whiteley Clinic
      • Guildford, United Kingdom
        • The Imaging Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females presenting with recurrent varicose veins in one or both legs with ultrasound proven pelvic venous reflux in at least one pelvic venous trunk communicating with the leg varicose veins
  • Duplex proven reflux in the superficial venous system of the leg
  • Over 18 years old
  • Able to understand and give consent
  • Willing to attend for follow-up over the five years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pelvic venous reflux does not communicate with the varicose veins to be treated in the legs
  • If pelvic venous reflux communicates and contributes to varicose veins in one leg but not the other, only the leg with a pelvic venous contribution will be entered into the study
  • Currently pregnant or plans for pregnancy within the next five years
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Unable to understand all give consent
  • Any vascular malformation of the pelvis all the legs apart from that diagnosed as venous reflux disease
  • Any medical condition likely to cause death or serious ill-health within the next five years Any deep venous obstruction or reflux

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: embolisation of pelvic veins & treatment of leg varicose veins
transjugular coil embolisation of pelvic veins followed by endovenous treatment of leg recurrent varicose veins
transjugular coil embolisation of pelvic veins
endovenous treatment of leg recurrent varicose veins
Active Comparator: endovenous treatment of leg recurrent varicose veins alone
endovenous treatment of leg recurrent varicose veins

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in recurrent varicose veins or venus reflux
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years post surgery

Does the patient have recurrence?

Recurrent varicose veins will be divided into:

  • Clinically insignificant (thread veins, reticular veins or varicose veins less than 3 mm in diameter)
  • Significant (varicose veins greater than 3 mm in diameter, varicose veins associated with thrombophlebitis, or skin changes such as venous eczema, red skin or Brown skin overlying the veins)
6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery

Participants will complete the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ)

The CIVIQ comprises 20 questions in four quality-of-life domains: physical, psychological, social, and pain.

6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery
Symptom severity
Time Frame: 6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery

Participants will complete the Aberdeen questionnaire to assess the severity and impact of their varicose veins on their lives.

Duplex ultrasound, the CEAP and VCCS will also be used to assess the severity of symptoms.

6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery
Source of recurrence
Time Frame: 6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery

Duplex ultrasound will be used to identify the source of any recurrent varicose veins, enabling classification into:

recurrence due to pelvic venous incompetence recurrence of leg varicose veins due to failure of surgery recurrence of leg varicose veins due to de novo reflux

6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery
Participants will complete a visual analogue scale, from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) to indicate their level of satisfaction with the treatment that they have received.
6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery
Incidences of thrombophlebitis and deep vein thrombosis.
6 weeks post surgery, 6 months post surgery, 1 year post surgery, 2 years post surgery, 3 years post surgery, 4 years post surgery, 5 years post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Whiteley, Professor, The Whiteley Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RCT23013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins

Clinical Trials on Coil embolisation

Search Similar Trials