Comparison of Glue with Microparticles in Prostatic Artery Embolization (EMBOLICOL)

November 6, 2024 updated by: Almaviva Sante

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Glue with Calibrated Microparticles in Prostatic Artery Embolisation As a Treatment for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is an alternative treatment to surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). It has been practised since 2012 and numerous publications have proved not only its safety but also its efficacy.

The principle of PAE is to occlude the prostatic arteries with an 'embolising agent', which will result in ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate.

The reference embolisation agent is a suspension of calibrated trisacryl microparticles 300-500 microns in size.

Recently, the use of glue has been retrospectively studied with acceptable efficacy and safety.

In this context, where only the results of retrospective studies are available, it is necessary to initiate comparative prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the glue compared with calibrated microparticles.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is an alternative treatment to surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and its place is recognised in the recommendations of the Male Voiding Disorders Committee (French Urological Association). It has been practised since 2012 (Carnevale et al, 2020), and numerous publications have proved not only its safety but also its efficacy (Malling et al, 2019).

The principle of PAE is to occlude the prostatic arteries with an 'embolising agent', which will result in ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate.

The reference embolisation agent, used by the majority of expert prostate embolisation teams, is a suspension of calibrated trisacryl microparticles 300-500 microns in size.

Recently, the use of glue has been retrospectively studied with acceptable efficacy and safety (Loffroy et al, 2021). Another retrospective comparative study (Salet et al, 2022) reported no significant difference in clinical efficacy between the use of glue and 300-500 micron trisacryl particles.

In this context, where only the results of retrospective studies are available, it is necessary to initiate comparative prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of the glue compared with calibrated microparticles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patient aged ≥ 50 years and ≤ 80 years
  • Patient with symptomatic BPH (prostatic volume ≥ 40 ml measured on prostatic MRI, IPSS ≥ 8, uroflowmetry < 15 ml/s).
  • Patient failing or intolerant to drug treatment (tadalafil and/or one of the alpha-blockers, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, silodosin or doxazosin).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with advanced and complicated BPH on renal and bladder ultrasound:

Severe obstruction related bladder wall lesions : >3 micro-diverticula or single or multiple diverticula with a sac diameter > 10 mm.

Chronic dilatation of the excretory cavities : diameter of one or both pyelons >15 mm.

  • Patient with suspected prostate or bladder cancer on MRI
  • Patients with moderate or severe chronic renal failure, with creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min.
  • Patient with prostate or bladder cancer diagnosed by biopsy in the 6 months preceding the inclusion visit.
  • Patient with an active urinary tract infection
  • Patient already included and participating in another clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Magic Glue®
Embolisation of the prostatic arteries will be performed with Magic Glue® combined with lipiodol
Magic Glue® will be injected within prostatic arteries, leading to ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate gland
Active Comparator: Embosphere®
Embolisation of prostatic arteries will be performed with 300-500 micron trisacryl particles (Embosphere®)
Embosphere® will be injected within prostatic arteries, leading to ischaemia and necrosis of part of the adenomatous tissue of the prostate gland

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of embolisation
Time Frame: Month 3
Efficacy of embolisation will be assessed with IPSS score (International Prostate Symptoms Score). IPSS questionnaire consists of 7 questions (ranging from 0 to 5) on mictional difficulties for a maximum total of 35 points (0 means no mictional difficulty).
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-Mictional Residue
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Post-Mictional Residue will be assessed will be measured in ml by ultrasound
Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Prostatic infarct areas
Time Frame: Month 3
Prostatic infarct areas will be measured in mm3 on MRI
Month 3
Sexual function
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Sexual function will be assessed with IIEF5 questionnaire (International Index of Erectile Function form 5) (0 - 25 points). Score lower than 10 means severe erectile dysfunction whereas score higher than 20 means normal erectile function.
Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Patient quality of life
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Patient quality of life will be assessed with IPSS quality of life question (1 - 7). 1 means patient is very satisfied of his/her quality of life
Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Prostatic Serum Antigen
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Prostatic Serum Antigen (PSA) will be measured from blood sample. Normal value should be lower than 4 ng/ml
Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Urinary flow
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Urinary flow will be measured in ml/s by flow measurement
Month 1, Month 3 and Month 12
Prostatic volume
Time Frame: Month 3 and Month 12
Prostatic volume will be in ml on MRI
Month 3 and Month 12
Efficacy of embolisation
Time Frame: Month 1 and Month 12
Efficacy of embolisation will be assessed with IPSS score (International Prostate Symptoms Score). IPSS questionnaire consists of 7 questions (ranging from 0 to 5) on mictional difficulties for a maximum total of 35 points (0 means no mictional difficulty).
Month 1 and Month 12
Safety of embolisation
Time Frame: Day 15, Month 3 and Month 12
Safety of embolisation will be assessed with post-empbolisation symptoms description and other adverse events description
Day 15, Month 3 and Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Grégory AMOUYAL, MD, Clinique de l'Alma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-08
  • ID-RCB number: 2024-A01753-44 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on Embolisation with Magic Glue®

Subscribe