In Vivo Treg Expansion and Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis

June 1, 2017 updated by: H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

In Vivo Treg Expansion and Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis With IL-2, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

IL-2 add-back post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), combined with Sirolimus (SIR), Tacrolimus (TAC) will optimize Treg reconstitution and prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

1) Determine if a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of IL-2/SIR/TAC enhances in vivo Treg differentiation and growth; 2) Study the safety and effects of IL-2/SIR/TAC on the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD; 3) Evaluate the influence of dual IL-2 supplementation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition on T cell-specific signaling pathways and the polarization of emerging T helper cells.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have an available 8/8 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 matched-related or unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cell graft.

  • Acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, or myeloproliferative neoplasms requiring a matched allogeneic HSCT.

    • Acute Leukemia (AML or ALL) must be in complete remission defined as: <5% marrow blasts with no morphologic evidence of leukemia, no peripheral blasts, marrow >20% cellular, and peripheral absolute neutrophil count >1000/µL (platelet recovery is not required).
    • Myelodysplasia (MDS) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Must have <5% marrow blasts.
    • Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): Must have <5% peripheral / marrow blasts.

  • Adequate vital organ function:

    1. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 45% by multi gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or ECHO
    2. Forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and adjusted diffusing lung capacity oxygenation (DLCO) ≥ 50% of predicted values on pulmonary function tests
    3. Transaminases (AST, ALT) < 2 times upper limit of normal values
    4. Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 cc/min.
  • Performance status: Karnofsky Performance Status Score ≥ 80%
  • Donor eligibility: Eligible donors will include healthy sibling, relative or unrelated donors that are matched with the patient at HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 by high resolution typing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection not controlled with appropriate antimicrobial therapy
  • History of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection
  • Anti-thymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, bortezomib, or cyclophosphamide administered within 14 days before or planned to receive with HCT conditioning or as part of GVHD prophylaxis in the 14 days after HCT.
  • Hypersensitivity to recombinant human IL-2
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-hodgkin lymphoma are excluded as these malignancies may express the IL-2 receptor and pose a potential growth signal to any present disease.
  • Sorror's co-morbidity factors with total score >4

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: GVHD Regimen
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen IL-2 with Sirolimus and Tacrolimus after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).
Drug: IL-2
A subcutaneous injection will be administered 3 times a week (separated by at least 1 day between injections), from day 0 to +90 (+/- 7 days).
Other Names:
  • Proleukin®
  • (aldesleukin)
Drug: Tacrolimus
Will be administered at 0.01 mg/kg/day (based on ideal body weight) continuous IV infusion or equivalent oral dosing starting on day -3
Drug: Sirolimus
Orally on day -1. The dose for loading is 12 mg by mouth (PO)
Other Names:
  • Rapamune

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regulatory T Cells (Tregs)/Total CD4+ Cells at Day 30 Post-HCT
Time Frame: 30 days post HCT
Percentage of Treg among blood CD4+ T cells at day 30 after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), to compare to SIR/TAC alone data from a previous trial (median of 16%). The study was designed to capture an increase in regulatory T cells from a median of 16.0% at day +30.
30 days post HCT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival at Day +365
Time Frame: 365 days post HCT
Overall survival will be defined as the time from transplant date to death from any cause.
365 days post HCT
Cumulative Incidence of Relapse
Time Frame: 1 year post HCT
Incidence of primary disease relapse per standard definitions.
1 year post HCT
Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD by Day +100
Time Frame: 100 days post HCT
Acute GVHD will be graded per the 1995 consensus guidelines.
100 days post HCT
Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD by Day +365
Time Frame: 365 days post HCT
Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD by day +365 per NIH Consensus criteria.
365 days post HCT
Incidence of Non-relapse Death
Time Frame: 365 days post HCT
Incidence of Non-relapse death/Transplant-related mortality. Non-relapse death is defined as death in continuous remission from primary disease requiring transplantation.
365 days post HCT
Incidence of Unexpected or Serious Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to days 130 post HCT
Grade 3-5 unexpected or serious adverse events (AEs) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.03) were captured up to day +130 or 30 days after the last dose of IL-2. Events listed, with causality in relation to study treatment noted.
Up to days 130 post HCT
Proportion of Treg Among Blood CD4+ T Cells at Day +90 After HCT
Time Frame: 90 days post HCT
The proportion of Tregs to non-Treg CD4+ cells to be assessed at day +90. Natural Killer Cells (NKs): Median K/uL NK cells.
90 days post HCT
STAT3, STAT5 (Y694), and S6 Phosphorylation Among Treg and Non-Treg at Day 30
Time Frame: 30 days post HCT
Phosphorylation (p): pSTAT3, pSTAT5 (Y694), and pS6 among Treg and non-Treg at day +30.
30 days post HCT
STAT3, STAT5 (Y694), and S6 Phosphorylation Among Treg and Non-Treg at Day 90
Time Frame: 90 days post HCT
Phosphorylation (p): pSTAT3, pSTAT5 (Y694), and pS6 among Treg and non-Treg at day +90.
90 days post HCT

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Function of Blood Treg After Allogeneic HSCT
Time Frame: 30 days post HCT
Percent of Treg suppression at day +30. Investigators had also planned to test Treg function at day +90, if sufficient Tregs had been available for analysis.
30 days post HCT
Rate of Natural Killer Cell (NK) Reconstitution
Time Frame: 365 days post HCT
Investigators planned to monitor natural killer cell (NK) reconstitution. Standard immune deficiency flow cytometry panels (IDP) was to be drawn on days +90, +180, and +365 to evaluate NK reconstitution. Results of standard lab tests to be compared to compiled data at a later date
365 days post HCT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Brian Betts, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 25, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 25, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MCC-17578
  • NCI-2014-00755 (Other Identifier: NCI CTRP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings