Omega-3 for Depression and Other Cardiac Risk Factors - 2 (Omega-3(2))

August 23, 2019 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Omega-3 for Depression and Other Cardiac Risk Factors-2

The purpose of this 10 week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial is to determine whether antidepressant augmentation with two grams of EPA omega-3 per day is superior to antidepressant therapy alone for major depression in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Depression increases the risk for cardiac morbidity and mortality 2-4 fold in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Recent clinical trials have tested standard treatments for comorbid depression in patients with CHD, and some have evaluated their effects on cardiac morbidity and mortality. Most of these trials have shown that standard treatments have only modest effects on depression and have produced relatively small differences between the intervention and control condition. Consequently, they have been unable to determine whether effective treatment of depression can improve cardiac outcomes. Low dietary intake and low plasma phospholipid or erythrocyte levels of two omega-3 fatty acids(FAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are associated with depression and other cardiac risk markers. There is growing evidence from small psychiatric trials that the efficacy of standard antidepressants can be improved by coadministration of an omega-3 FA formulation containing at least 1 gram of EPA. The purpose of the proposed research is to determine whether antidepressant augmentation with this omega-3 formulation is superior to antidepressant therapy alone for major depression in patients with CHD. The proposed study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Consenting patients with established coronary heart disease who meet the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 criteria for a major depressive episode will undergo a baseline evaluation and then be randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg/day of sertraline plus omega-3 FA or 50 mg/day of sertraline plus placebo for 10 weeks. At baseline and after 10 weeks, participants will complete assessments of depression, 24 hour ambulatory ECG monitoring to measure 24 hour heart rate and heart rate variability, and blood draws to measure procoagulant and proinflammatory markers and blood levels of EPA, DHA, other omega-3 FAs, and the omega-6 FAs. If sertraline plus this omega-3 formulation significantly reduces depression compared to sertraline plus placebo, and if it improves or at least does not worsen other cardiovascular risk markers, this study will provide a strong basis for proposing a multicenter clinical trial of sertraline augmented with omega-3 to determine whether treatment of depression can improve survival in patients with CHD and depression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
144

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63108
        • Washington University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented coronary heart disease
  • Diagnosis of major depression based on structured interview

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe cognitive impairment
  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for depressive disorder due to a general medical condition or medication
  • Major Axis I psychiatric disorder other than unipolar depression or an anxiety disorder, a high risk of suicide, or current substance abuse other than tobacco;
  • Not expected to survive one year or physically unable to tolerate the study protocol
  • Known sensitivity to sertraline or omega-3, or an allergy to fish oil or shellfish
  • Taking an antidepressant or an omega-3 supplement at baseline
  • Exempted by their cardiologist or primary care physician
  • Refuses to provide informed consent
  • Participating in a competing protocol or trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Omega-3 supplement
Two grams of the EPA form of omega-3 plus 50 mg of sertraline daily for 10 weeks
Drug: Omega-3 supplement
Two grams of the EPA form of omega-3 daily and 50 mgs of sertraline daily for 10 weeks
Other Names:
  • EPA Plus Minami Nutrition
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Two grams of corn oil plus 50 mg of sertraline daily for 10 weeks.
Drug: Placebo
Two grams of corn oil plus 50 mg of sertraline daily for 10 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 10 weeks (post-treatment)
The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report inventory of depression symptoms. The minimum and maximum values for the BDI-II are (0-63). For both instruments, the higher the scores, the greater the severity of depression.
Change from baseline to 10 weeks (post-treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D, 17)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 10 weeks (post-treatment)
The HAM-D, 17 is a 17-item, observer-rated measure of depression symptoms. The minimum and maximum values for the HAM-D, (0-52). For both instruments, the higher the scores, the greater the severity of depression.
Change from baseline to 10 weeks (post-treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 14, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 13, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 13, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201309002
  • R01HL117805 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings