Magnamosis First-in-human Study of Feasibility and Safety (Magnamosis)

June 12, 2023 updated by: Michael Harrison

Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis) First-in-human Study of Feasibility and Safety

Anastomosis of intestine or other viscera currently requires open or laparoscopic surgery and is often the most difficult, time-consuming, and expensive part of many operations. We have developed a device ("Magnamosis") that may create compression anastomoses more easily, quickly, and less expensively than sutures or staples. The Magnamosis device consists of two 23-mm diameter, convex-concave, radially symmetric ring magnets encased in polycarbonate. One magnet is placed in the lumen of each viscus to be joined, the magnets self-align, and a compression anastomosis is achieved by tissue remodeling. We have completed extensive pre-clinical studies in animals and have shown that Magnamosis can be used to accomplish gastrojejunostomy, jejunojejunostomy, duodenal-colostomy, and colo-colostomy safely and effectively using available endoscopic and minimally invasive surgery techniques. We are now conducting a small first-in-human study to obtain clinical data in support of the safety and early feasibility of the Magnamosis device.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a non-randomized, prospective, single-center pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of creating an intestinal anastomosis using the Magnamosis Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis) device under FDA IDE G130046. Ten, otherwise healthy, subjects, ages 18-60 years, with a disease process necessitating open or laparoscopic surgical anastomosis for re-establishment of intestinal continuity that would otherwise be performed using sutures or stapling devices will be enrolled. Participation in the study requires a time commitment of three months. The total duration of the study is 18 months to ensure three-month follow-up on each subject, with long-term follow-up of each subject at one and two years postoperation. The primary outcome measure will be the incidence of anastomotic leaks related to the use of the Magnamosis device. Anastomotic leakage will be defined as clinical symptoms such as fever, sepsis or peritonitis within 30 days postoperatively leading to a clinical and/or radiological interventional procedure or reoperation that confirms that the leakage is related to the device. Secondary outcome measures will include the rate of occurrence of other device-related complications during hospitalization and post-procedure, including the rate of bleeding, perforation, retention of foreign body, and anastomotic stricture documented by symptoms or imaging within three months of procedure. The duration of hospitalization, number of days to passage of Magnamosis device (found in stool or absent on x-ray), and number of days to the first postoperative bowel movement will also be measured. Post-operative administration of the pain scale will also yield study data. Subject follow-up will be conducted after discharge at 2 weeks (in person, in clinic), and at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years either in person, via email, telephone, Skype, or other non in-person method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • UCSF-Mission Bay
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco - Parnassus Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and ≤ 60 years of age
  • Requires non-emergent operation to create an intestinal anastomosis for maintenance of intestinal continuity in which the Magnamosis device can be used instead of sutures or staples.
  • Able to read, speak and understand English
  • Demonstrates an understanding of the study procedures and risks, and can provide signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intestines to be anastomosed are not appropriate in size, thickness or tissue health for the Magnamosis device. For example,

    • Intestine too small to accommodate 23-mm diameter device; or
    • Intestine so large that 23-mm diameter anastomotic lumen is not adequate; or
    • Intestine too thickened to allow two halves of device to come together with sufficient force to produce compression anastomosis (e.g. inflamed or scarred intestinal wall; a foreign body like staples in anastomosis); or
    • Inadequate blood supply
  • Requires anastomosis of the stomach
  • Bowel is not well perfused
  • Anastomosis will be under tension
  • Anatomic reconstruction requires crossing a staple line
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score 4 or 5;
  • Requires more than one anastomosis during operation;
  • Women possibly or known to be pregnant;
  • Inability to obtain pre-authorization from insurance company or third party payor
  • Does not meet all inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Magnamosis
Create an intestinal anastomosis using the Magnamosis Magnetic Compression Anastomosis (Magnamosis) device to re-establish intestinal continuity that would otherwise be performed using sutures or stapling devices
Device: Magnamosis
Single-use, sterile device enables creation of a circular compression intestinal anastomosis. Device is comprised of matched pair of self-centering rare earth magnets encased in medical grade polycarbonate. Geometry of magnets' mating surfaces applies force on inside of mated rings to produce compression necrosis of intervening intestinal walls. Lesser force on outside of mated rings produces inflammatory healing of the two co-apted intestinal walls. Internal lumen creates patency of the anastomosis to prevent intestinal obstruction during compression anastomosis creation. In 5-10 days, mated rings with necrotic tissue falls into intestinal lumen and is naturally expelled with stool, leaving a well-healed anastomosis.
Other Names:
  • Magnetic Compression Anastomosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of subjects who experience occurrence of anastomotic leak
Time Frame: Up to 2 years postoperation
Subject follow-up will be performed at postoperation 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months, 1 and 2 years to assess the occurrence of an anastomotic leak
Up to 2 years postoperation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of subjects who experience other device-related complications
Time Frame: Up to 2 years postoperation
Other device-related complications include stricture, obstruction, bleeding, delayed expulsion of the device, device failure, bowel perforation will be assessed at 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months, and 1 and 2 years postoperation
Up to 2 years postoperation
Number of patients who have an adequate anastomosis
Time Frame: Up to 2 years postoperation
Determine if anastomosis using Magnamosis is adequate. Follow-up will be at 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months, and 1 and 2 years postoperation.
Up to 2 years postoperation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Michael Harrison

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of California, San Francisco

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael R Harrison, MD, UCSF Professor Emeritus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13-11536

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings