Effectiveness of Cognitive, Exposure, and Skills Group Manualized Treatments in Operations Iraqi (OIF)/Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Female Veterans

February 20, 2014 updated by: Diane T. Castillo, Ph.D., New Mexico VA Healthcare System

Phase II Efficacy Study on Group Delivery of Effective Treatments for PTSD

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a group protocol for the delivery of evidence-based therapies in comparison to a wait-list control and evaluate the relative contribution of exposure, cognitive, and skills blocks of treatment in a 16-session manualized group treatment protocol in a sample of OIF/OEF female PTSD veterans. Hyp1: Overall improvement is expected in PTSD symptoms compared to a wait-list control group; and Hyp2: the exposure and cognitive components are expected to show greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than the skills component. Significant results will establish the efficacy of a group format for evidence-based treatments for all veterans with a PTSD diagnosis. An ancillary part of the study is to examine initial neuropsychological presentation in this population and possible changes that may occur as the result of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to 1) evaluate the effectiveness of exposure, cognitive, and skills (assertiveness/relaxation) therapies within a 16-session group; and 2) evaluate the relative contribution of each of three treatment components in a manualized treatment group in a sample of OIF/OEF female PTSD veterans. HYPOTHESES: Hypothesis 1. Female OIF/OEF PTSD veterans will show reductions in PTSD symptoms and improvement in general functioning after participation in a structured group treatment compared to a wait-list control group. Hypothesis 2. Exposure and cognitive components will show greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than the skills component. RESEARCH DESIGN/BACKGROUND: Based on studies with male combat veterans, female civilian rape victims, and female veterans, therapies most effective for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are exposure therapy (1,2,3) and cognitive restructuring (4), with less improvement found in other treatments, such as relaxation and assertiveness training (5). Most examinations of PTSD treatments have been conducted in an individual format, but most PTSD treatments offered in Veterans Administration (VA) hospital PTSD programs are conducted in a group format (6). It is critical to determine if these therapies work in a group setting, as only one study (7) found no differences in exposure therapy compared to a support group. In a comprehensive manualized group treatment protocol (8) exposure therapy provided in a group was found effective (9). The aim of the present study is to establish the effectiveness of exposure therapy, among other evidence-based therapies, in a well designed randomized study. METHODOLOGY: Castillo's (8) manualized group treatment protocol for female veterans with PTSD will be modified into a 16-week treatment group with a five-week exposure, five-week cognitive, and four-week skills treatment blocks. Seventy-two subjects will be assessed with structured interviews (SCID and CAPS) and questionnaires (Traumatic Life Events and Quality of Life Inventory) and randomized into one of two arms: 16-week immediate treatment, or a 16-week wait-list control, the latter of which will be reassessed and offered the study treatment. Oversampling will result in 72 subjects in the active treatment arm. Subjects will be reassessed upon completion of treatment or wait-list, at 3, and 6 months following treatment. All treatment groups will include three female OIF/OEF veterans positive for PTSD. The treatment blocks will be varied into six possible orders to control for order effects and the PTSD Symptom Checklist will be administered after each treatment block. Data will be collected for three years. CLINICAL RELATIONSHIPS: Significant results will contribute to the establishment of evidence-based treatments in a manualized treatment group for all veterans with a PTSD diagnosis. FINDINGS: Present findings from Dr. Castillo's lab suggest the effectiveness of exposure therapy in a group setting.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
86

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87108
        • New Mexico VA Health Care System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of PTSD
  • Iraq or Afghanistan female Veteran
  • Psychiatry stability (no suicide, homicide)
  • One clear memory of a trauma
  • Stability on psychiatric medications for 1 month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active substance use/abuse (or in remission less than 3 mo)
  • Psychotic symptoms or diagnosis
  • Bipolar disorder diagnosis
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Involvement in a violent relationship
  • Self mutilation within past 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 16-Week Group Treatment
The 16-week treatment group will contain 3 blocks of treatment (exposure, cognitive, skills) with order randomized within the treatment. The first and last group session are considered inactive treatment sessions. The group treatment will be provided weekly.
Behavioral: 16-Week Group Treatment
Within the 16-week group treatment, the cognitive block will contain 5 sessions, the exposure block will contain 5 sessions, and the skills block will contain 4 sessions.
Other Names:
  • Cognitive treatment
  • Exposure treatment
  • Skills treatment
  • Group treatment
No Intervention: Wait List Control
The Wait List Control group will receive minimal attention, as they will meet bi-monthly for supportive sessions with the study psychologist. The study psychologist will not introduce any active treatment in the individual sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PTSD from baseline on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) to post-treatment, 3 months, and 6 months later.
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment, 3 months follow up, 6 months follow up.
Interview administration of the CAPS by independent assessor captures current (past month) and lifetime symptoms and diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Baseline, post-treatment, 3 months follow up, 6 months follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mental and physical functioning from baseline on the Health Related Quality of Life (SF36) to post-treatment, 3 months, and 6 months later.
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow up
Self-report questionnaire measures 8 life-functioning scales summarized by two content scales--Mental and Physical functioning.
Baseline, post-treatment, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow up
Change in quality of life from baseline on the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) to post-treatment, 3 months, and 6 months later.
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow up
QOLI is a self-report questionnaire measuring overall quality of life across 16 domains.
Baseline, post-treatment, 3-month follow up, 6-month follow up
Change in PTSD from baseline to points during treatment with the PTSD Symptom Checklist (PCL).
Time Frame: Baseline, after each treatment block (every 5 weeks), post-treatment
The PCL is a self-report questionnaire measuring 17 PTSD symptoms.
Baseline, after each treatment block (every 5 weeks), post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New Mexico VA Healthcare System

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Diane T Castillo, Ph.D., New Mexico VA Healthcare System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • W81XWH-08-2-0022
  • PT074309 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on 16-Week Group Treatment

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings