Rivaroxaban for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (RAPS)

October 16, 2017 updated by: St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Rivaroxaban in Antiphospholipid Syndrome Pilot Study: A Multicenter Feasibility Study of Rivaroxaban for Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Prior Arterial or Venous Thrombosis

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is a syndrome associated with excessive blood clotting (thrombosis). APS is among the most common cause of heart attack and stroke in patients under the age of 50 and is particularly prevalent in patients with autoimmune conditions. Patients with APS and prior thrombosis require lifelong anticoagulant therapy to prevent recurrent clots; such therapy is currently provided with warfarin. Warfarin requires frequent bloodwork monitoring, and many medications or foods can alter its effect, which can put people either at increased risk for clotting or bleeding. Rivaroxaban is a new mediation that prevents blood clots that does not require bloodwork monitoring and that has fewer interactions. This study is a pilot feasibility study which will: 1) examine our ability to identify 150 eligible APS patients; 2) measure our ability to obtain consent from 135 of these patients; and 3) test our hypothesis that we can obtain 95% compliance with daily rivaroxaban administration. The investigators propose to treat eligible patients with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily. Patients will be followed for a minimum of one year and their rates of bleeding and thrombosis will be monitored as secondary outcome measures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
81

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P4
        • University of Alberta Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
        • Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2
        • Hamilton General Hospital
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • Jewish General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prior objectively-confirmed venous thrombosis, irrespective of history of arterial thrombosis
  • Two or more prior positive APS serological evaluations at least 12 weeks apart
  • Current treatment with warfarin administered to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.0, rivaroxaban or dabigatran at any dose currently used for secondary prophylaxis of thrombosis, or short term therapeutic dose LMWH (for example, for the treatment of recently diagnosed deep vein thrombosis). Patients not currently receiving anticoagulation but in whom anticoagulation is mandated, may also be enrolled if a 20 mg rivaroxaban dose would be appropriate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior recurrent thrombosis while taking warfarin with a demonstrated INR of 2.0 to 3.0, or prior recurrent thrombosis while receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban
  • History of isolated arterial thrombosis (no history of venous thrombosis) pending CTA approval by Health Canada
  • Need for continued treatment with both aspirin (irrespective of dose) AND clopidogrel
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period; women who may become pregnant will be required to utilize reliable contraceptive measures while on study drug
  • Chronic kidney disease with calculated GFR < 30mL/min
  • Geographic inaccessibility
  • Age < 18 years
  • Inability or failure to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban 20mg po daily
Drug: Rivaroxaban
Other Names:
  • Xarelto

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of identification for enrolment
Time Frame: 18 months
The investigators define success as the ability to identify 150 eligible patients at 6 clinical centres over 18 months.
18 months
Feasibility of Consent
Time Frame: 18 months
The investigators define success as a consent rate of 90% (thus, if we identify 150 patients, at least 135 will provide consent).
18 months
Compliance
Time Frame: Minimum of one year for all subjects
The investigators define success as a patient missing fewer than 5% of days with pill administrations, as measured by pill counts.
Minimum of one year for all subjects

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding
Time Frame: Minimum of one year for all subjects
The investigators will collect and report the rates of minor bleeding (clinically apparent bleeding that does not meet the criteria for major), and major and fatal bleeding. Major bleeding will be defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria.
Minimum of one year for all subjects
Thrombosis
Time Frame: Minimum of one year for all subjects
The investigators will collect and report the rates of objectively-confirmed venous and arterial thrombosis.
Minimum of one year for all subjects

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Bayer
University of Alberta
The Ottawa Hospital
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Jewish General Hospital
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly J Legault, MD, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Mark A Crowther, MD, MSc, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • G-13-0002011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings